Cargando…
Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
PURPOSE: Spinal cord delineation is critical to the delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Although underestimating the spinal cord can lead to irreversible myelopathy, overestimating the spinal cord may compromise the planning target volume coverage. We compare spinal cord contours...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101158 |
_version_ | 1784902173770907648 |
---|---|
author | Hammoudeh, Lubna Abunimer, Abdullah M. Lee, Ho Young Dee, Edward Christopher Brennan S, Victoria Yaguang, Pei Shin, Kee-Young Chen, Yu-Hui Huynh, Mai Anh Spektor, Alexander Guenette, Jeffrey P. Balboni, Tracy |
author_facet | Hammoudeh, Lubna Abunimer, Abdullah M. Lee, Ho Young Dee, Edward Christopher Brennan S, Victoria Yaguang, Pei Shin, Kee-Young Chen, Yu-Hui Huynh, Mai Anh Spektor, Alexander Guenette, Jeffrey P. Balboni, Tracy |
author_sort | Hammoudeh, Lubna |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Spinal cord delineation is critical to the delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Although underestimating the spinal cord can lead to irreversible myelopathy, overestimating the spinal cord may compromise the planning target volume coverage. We compare spinal cord contours based on computed tomography (CT) simulation with a myelogram to spinal cord contours based on fused axial T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight patients with 9 spinal metastases treated with spinal SBRT were contoured by 8 radiation oncologists, neurosurgeons, and physicists, with spinal cord definition based on (1) fused axial T2 MRI and (2) CT-myelogram simulation images, yielding 72 sets of spinal cord contours. The spinal cord volume was contoured at the target vertebral body volume based on both images. The mixed-effect model assessed comparisons of T2 MRI- to myelogram-defined spinal cord in centroid deviations (deviations in the center point of the cord) through the vertebral body target volume, spinal cord volumes, and maximum doses (0.035 cc point) to the spinal cord applying the patient's SBRT treatment plan, in addition to in-between and within-subject variabilities. RESULTS: The estimate for the fixed effect from the mixed model showed that the mean difference between 72 CT volumes and 72 MRI volumes was 0.06 cc and was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval, –0.034, 0.153; P = .1832). The mixed model showed that the mean dose at 0.035 cc for CT-defined spinal cord contours was 1.24 Gy lower than that of MRI-defined spinal cord contours and was statistically significant (95% confidence interval, –2.292, –0.180; P = .0271). Also, the mixed model indicated no statistical significance for deviations in any of the axes between MRI-defined spinal cord contours and CT-defined spinal cord contours. CONCLUSIONS: CT myelogram may not be required when MRI imaging is feasible, although uncertainty at the cord-to-treatment volume interface may result in overcontouring and hence higher estimated cord dose-maximums with axial T2 MRI-based cord definition. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9991542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99915422023-03-08 Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Hammoudeh, Lubna Abunimer, Abdullah M. Lee, Ho Young Dee, Edward Christopher Brennan S, Victoria Yaguang, Pei Shin, Kee-Young Chen, Yu-Hui Huynh, Mai Anh Spektor, Alexander Guenette, Jeffrey P. Balboni, Tracy Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Spinal cord delineation is critical to the delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Although underestimating the spinal cord can lead to irreversible myelopathy, overestimating the spinal cord may compromise the planning target volume coverage. We compare spinal cord contours based on computed tomography (CT) simulation with a myelogram to spinal cord contours based on fused axial T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight patients with 9 spinal metastases treated with spinal SBRT were contoured by 8 radiation oncologists, neurosurgeons, and physicists, with spinal cord definition based on (1) fused axial T2 MRI and (2) CT-myelogram simulation images, yielding 72 sets of spinal cord contours. The spinal cord volume was contoured at the target vertebral body volume based on both images. The mixed-effect model assessed comparisons of T2 MRI- to myelogram-defined spinal cord in centroid deviations (deviations in the center point of the cord) through the vertebral body target volume, spinal cord volumes, and maximum doses (0.035 cc point) to the spinal cord applying the patient's SBRT treatment plan, in addition to in-between and within-subject variabilities. RESULTS: The estimate for the fixed effect from the mixed model showed that the mean difference between 72 CT volumes and 72 MRI volumes was 0.06 cc and was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval, –0.034, 0.153; P = .1832). The mixed model showed that the mean dose at 0.035 cc for CT-defined spinal cord contours was 1.24 Gy lower than that of MRI-defined spinal cord contours and was statistically significant (95% confidence interval, –2.292, –0.180; P = .0271). Also, the mixed model indicated no statistical significance for deviations in any of the axes between MRI-defined spinal cord contours and CT-defined spinal cord contours. CONCLUSIONS: CT myelogram may not be required when MRI imaging is feasible, although uncertainty at the cord-to-treatment volume interface may result in overcontouring and hence higher estimated cord dose-maximums with axial T2 MRI-based cord definition. Elsevier 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9991542/ /pubmed/36896211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101158 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Scientific Article Hammoudeh, Lubna Abunimer, Abdullah M. Lee, Ho Young Dee, Edward Christopher Brennan S, Victoria Yaguang, Pei Shin, Kee-Young Chen, Yu-Hui Huynh, Mai Anh Spektor, Alexander Guenette, Jeffrey P. Balboni, Tracy Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title | Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title_full | Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title_fullStr | Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title_short | Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy |
title_sort | spinal cord delineation based on computed tomography myelogram versus t2 magnetic resonance imaging in spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy |
topic | Scientific Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hammoudehlubna spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT abunimerabdullahm spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT leehoyoung spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT deeedwardchristopher spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT brennansvictoria spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT yaguangpei spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT shinkeeyoung spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT chenyuhui spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT huynhmaianh spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT spektoralexander spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT guenettejeffreyp spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT balbonitracy spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy |