Cargando…

Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE: Spinal cord delineation is critical to the delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Although underestimating the spinal cord can lead to irreversible myelopathy, overestimating the spinal cord may compromise the planning target volume coverage. We compare spinal cord contours...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hammoudeh, Lubna, Abunimer, Abdullah M., Lee, Ho Young, Dee, Edward Christopher, Brennan S, Victoria, Yaguang, Pei, Shin, Kee-Young, Chen, Yu-Hui, Huynh, Mai Anh, Spektor, Alexander, Guenette, Jeffrey P., Balboni, Tracy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101158
_version_ 1784902173770907648
author Hammoudeh, Lubna
Abunimer, Abdullah M.
Lee, Ho Young
Dee, Edward Christopher
Brennan S, Victoria
Yaguang, Pei
Shin, Kee-Young
Chen, Yu-Hui
Huynh, Mai Anh
Spektor, Alexander
Guenette, Jeffrey P.
Balboni, Tracy
author_facet Hammoudeh, Lubna
Abunimer, Abdullah M.
Lee, Ho Young
Dee, Edward Christopher
Brennan S, Victoria
Yaguang, Pei
Shin, Kee-Young
Chen, Yu-Hui
Huynh, Mai Anh
Spektor, Alexander
Guenette, Jeffrey P.
Balboni, Tracy
author_sort Hammoudeh, Lubna
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Spinal cord delineation is critical to the delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Although underestimating the spinal cord can lead to irreversible myelopathy, overestimating the spinal cord may compromise the planning target volume coverage. We compare spinal cord contours based on computed tomography (CT) simulation with a myelogram to spinal cord contours based on fused axial T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight patients with 9 spinal metastases treated with spinal SBRT were contoured by 8 radiation oncologists, neurosurgeons, and physicists, with spinal cord definition based on (1) fused axial T2 MRI and (2) CT-myelogram simulation images, yielding 72 sets of spinal cord contours. The spinal cord volume was contoured at the target vertebral body volume based on both images. The mixed-effect model assessed comparisons of T2 MRI- to myelogram-defined spinal cord in centroid deviations (deviations in the center point of the cord) through the vertebral body target volume, spinal cord volumes, and maximum doses (0.035 cc point) to the spinal cord applying the patient's SBRT treatment plan, in addition to in-between and within-subject variabilities. RESULTS: The estimate for the fixed effect from the mixed model showed that the mean difference between 72 CT volumes and 72 MRI volumes was 0.06 cc and was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval, –0.034, 0.153; P = .1832). The mixed model showed that the mean dose at 0.035 cc for CT-defined spinal cord contours was 1.24 Gy lower than that of MRI-defined spinal cord contours and was statistically significant (95% confidence interval, –2.292, –0.180; P = .0271). Also, the mixed model indicated no statistical significance for deviations in any of the axes between MRI-defined spinal cord contours and CT-defined spinal cord contours. CONCLUSIONS: CT myelogram may not be required when MRI imaging is feasible, although uncertainty at the cord-to-treatment volume interface may result in overcontouring and hence higher estimated cord dose-maximums with axial T2 MRI-based cord definition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9991542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99915422023-03-08 Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Hammoudeh, Lubna Abunimer, Abdullah M. Lee, Ho Young Dee, Edward Christopher Brennan S, Victoria Yaguang, Pei Shin, Kee-Young Chen, Yu-Hui Huynh, Mai Anh Spektor, Alexander Guenette, Jeffrey P. Balboni, Tracy Adv Radiat Oncol Scientific Article PURPOSE: Spinal cord delineation is critical to the delivery of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Although underestimating the spinal cord can lead to irreversible myelopathy, overestimating the spinal cord may compromise the planning target volume coverage. We compare spinal cord contours based on computed tomography (CT) simulation with a myelogram to spinal cord contours based on fused axial T2 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eight patients with 9 spinal metastases treated with spinal SBRT were contoured by 8 radiation oncologists, neurosurgeons, and physicists, with spinal cord definition based on (1) fused axial T2 MRI and (2) CT-myelogram simulation images, yielding 72 sets of spinal cord contours. The spinal cord volume was contoured at the target vertebral body volume based on both images. The mixed-effect model assessed comparisons of T2 MRI- to myelogram-defined spinal cord in centroid deviations (deviations in the center point of the cord) through the vertebral body target volume, spinal cord volumes, and maximum doses (0.035 cc point) to the spinal cord applying the patient's SBRT treatment plan, in addition to in-between and within-subject variabilities. RESULTS: The estimate for the fixed effect from the mixed model showed that the mean difference between 72 CT volumes and 72 MRI volumes was 0.06 cc and was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval, –0.034, 0.153; P = .1832). The mixed model showed that the mean dose at 0.035 cc for CT-defined spinal cord contours was 1.24 Gy lower than that of MRI-defined spinal cord contours and was statistically significant (95% confidence interval, –2.292, –0.180; P = .0271). Also, the mixed model indicated no statistical significance for deviations in any of the axes between MRI-defined spinal cord contours and CT-defined spinal cord contours. CONCLUSIONS: CT myelogram may not be required when MRI imaging is feasible, although uncertainty at the cord-to-treatment volume interface may result in overcontouring and hence higher estimated cord dose-maximums with axial T2 MRI-based cord definition. Elsevier 2022-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9991542/ /pubmed/36896211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101158 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Scientific Article
Hammoudeh, Lubna
Abunimer, Abdullah M.
Lee, Ho Young
Dee, Edward Christopher
Brennan S, Victoria
Yaguang, Pei
Shin, Kee-Young
Chen, Yu-Hui
Huynh, Mai Anh
Spektor, Alexander
Guenette, Jeffrey P.
Balboni, Tracy
Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title_full Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title_fullStr Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title_short Spinal Cord Delineation Based on Computed Tomography Myelogram Versus T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Spinal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
title_sort spinal cord delineation based on computed tomography myelogram versus t2 magnetic resonance imaging in spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy
topic Scientific Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36896211
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2022.101158
work_keys_str_mv AT hammoudehlubna spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT abunimerabdullahm spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT leehoyoung spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT deeedwardchristopher spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT brennansvictoria spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT yaguangpei spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT shinkeeyoung spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT chenyuhui spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT huynhmaianh spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT spektoralexander spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT guenettejeffreyp spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy
AT balbonitracy spinalcorddelineationbasedoncomputedtomographymyelogramversust2magneticresonanceimaginginspinalstereotacticbodyradiationtherapy