Cargando…

Recent trends of “manels”: gender representation among invited panelists at an international oncology conference

BACKGROUND: Gender disparities in academic medicine are a long-acknowledged concern, particularly at medical conferences. We investigated gender representation and prevalence of “manels” (all-men panels) among invited speakers at the 2018-2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meetings. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamran, Sophia C, Yeap, Beow Y, Ghosh, Anushka, Aldrighetti, Christopher M, Willers, Henning, Vapiwala, Neha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36762819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad008
_version_ 1784902186082238464
author Kamran, Sophia C
Yeap, Beow Y
Ghosh, Anushka
Aldrighetti, Christopher M
Willers, Henning
Vapiwala, Neha
author_facet Kamran, Sophia C
Yeap, Beow Y
Ghosh, Anushka
Aldrighetti, Christopher M
Willers, Henning
Vapiwala, Neha
author_sort Kamran, Sophia C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gender disparities in academic medicine are a long-acknowledged concern, particularly at medical conferences. We investigated gender representation and prevalence of “manels” (all-men panels) among invited speakers at the 2018-2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meetings. METHODS: Using American Society of Clinical Oncology online programs, 2018-2021 faculty information was obtained, including perceived or self-reported gender, medical specialty, session type, and topic. Primary outcomes were percentage of manels and proportion of women panelists over time; women representation among specialties and topics were evaluated. Cochran-Armitage and Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyze trends in proportion of manels and women representation over time and to compare each session type, topic, or specialty with other categories combined, respectively. RESULTS: During 2018-2021, there were 670 sessions, 81 of which (12.1%) were manels. Among 2475 panelists, 1181 (47.7%) were women. Over time, the percentage of manels significantly decreased from 17.4% in 2018 to 9.9% in 2021 (P = .030). The highest proportion of manels was observed for leadership or special sessions (17.1%, P = .419). Women panelists were underrepresented for the topics of genitourinary cancers (38.6%, P = .029) and translational or preclinical sciences (36.7%, P < .001). There was a positive trend toward improved women representation among translational or preclinical sciences (27.4% in 2018 vs 41.8% in 2021, P = .031) but not among genitourinary cancers (41.1% in 2018 vs 40.7% in 2021, P = .969). CONCLUSIONS: The number of women panelists increased during the study period, with a corresponding decrease in the proportion of manels, specifically in education and leadership or special sessions. Ongoing underrepresentation of women in genitourinary cancers and translational or preclinical topics underscores the importance of annual meeting organizers continuing to strive for diverse gender representation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9991598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99915982023-03-08 Recent trends of “manels”: gender representation among invited panelists at an international oncology conference Kamran, Sophia C Yeap, Beow Y Ghosh, Anushka Aldrighetti, Christopher M Willers, Henning Vapiwala, Neha JNCI Cancer Spectr Article BACKGROUND: Gender disparities in academic medicine are a long-acknowledged concern, particularly at medical conferences. We investigated gender representation and prevalence of “manels” (all-men panels) among invited speakers at the 2018-2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meetings. METHODS: Using American Society of Clinical Oncology online programs, 2018-2021 faculty information was obtained, including perceived or self-reported gender, medical specialty, session type, and topic. Primary outcomes were percentage of manels and proportion of women panelists over time; women representation among specialties and topics were evaluated. Cochran-Armitage and Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyze trends in proportion of manels and women representation over time and to compare each session type, topic, or specialty with other categories combined, respectively. RESULTS: During 2018-2021, there were 670 sessions, 81 of which (12.1%) were manels. Among 2475 panelists, 1181 (47.7%) were women. Over time, the percentage of manels significantly decreased from 17.4% in 2018 to 9.9% in 2021 (P = .030). The highest proportion of manels was observed for leadership or special sessions (17.1%, P = .419). Women panelists were underrepresented for the topics of genitourinary cancers (38.6%, P = .029) and translational or preclinical sciences (36.7%, P < .001). There was a positive trend toward improved women representation among translational or preclinical sciences (27.4% in 2018 vs 41.8% in 2021, P = .031) but not among genitourinary cancers (41.1% in 2018 vs 40.7% in 2021, P = .969). CONCLUSIONS: The number of women panelists increased during the study period, with a corresponding decrease in the proportion of manels, specifically in education and leadership or special sessions. Ongoing underrepresentation of women in genitourinary cancers and translational or preclinical topics underscores the importance of annual meeting organizers continuing to strive for diverse gender representation. Oxford University Press 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9991598/ /pubmed/36762819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad008 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Kamran, Sophia C
Yeap, Beow Y
Ghosh, Anushka
Aldrighetti, Christopher M
Willers, Henning
Vapiwala, Neha
Recent trends of “manels”: gender representation among invited panelists at an international oncology conference
title Recent trends of “manels”: gender representation among invited panelists at an international oncology conference
title_full Recent trends of “manels”: gender representation among invited panelists at an international oncology conference
title_fullStr Recent trends of “manels”: gender representation among invited panelists at an international oncology conference
title_full_unstemmed Recent trends of “manels”: gender representation among invited panelists at an international oncology conference
title_short Recent trends of “manels”: gender representation among invited panelists at an international oncology conference
title_sort recent trends of “manels”: gender representation among invited panelists at an international oncology conference
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36762819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkad008
work_keys_str_mv AT kamransophiac recenttrendsofmanelsgenderrepresentationamonginvitedpanelistsataninternationaloncologyconference
AT yeapbeowy recenttrendsofmanelsgenderrepresentationamonginvitedpanelistsataninternationaloncologyconference
AT ghoshanushka recenttrendsofmanelsgenderrepresentationamonginvitedpanelistsataninternationaloncologyconference
AT aldrighettichristopherm recenttrendsofmanelsgenderrepresentationamonginvitedpanelistsataninternationaloncologyconference
AT willershenning recenttrendsofmanelsgenderrepresentationamonginvitedpanelistsataninternationaloncologyconference
AT vapiwalaneha recenttrendsofmanelsgenderrepresentationamonginvitedpanelistsataninternationaloncologyconference