Cargando…
What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to critically analyse Australia’s current and proposed policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption. Over-consumption of added sugar is a significant public health nutrition issue. The competing interests, values and beliefs among stakeholders mean they have disparate...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022000234 |
_version_ | 1784902191779151872 |
---|---|
author | Russell, Cherie Baker, Phillip Grimes, Carley Lawrence, Mark Andrew |
author_facet | Russell, Cherie Baker, Phillip Grimes, Carley Lawrence, Mark Andrew |
author_sort | Russell, Cherie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to critically analyse Australia’s current and proposed policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption. Over-consumption of added sugar is a significant public health nutrition issue. The competing interests, values and beliefs among stakeholders mean they have disparate views regarding which policy actions are preferable to reduce added sugar consumption. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews using purposive, snowball sampling and policy mapping. Policy actions were classified by two frameworks: NOURISHING (e.g. behaviour change communication, food environment and food system) and the Orders of Change (e.g. first order: technical adjustments, second order: reforming the system, third order: transforming the system). SETTING: Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two stakeholders from the food industry, food regulation, government, public health groups and academia. RESULTS: All proposed and existing policy actions targeted the food environment/behaviour change; most were assessed as first-order changes, and reductionist (nutrient specific) in nature. Influences on policy actions included industry power, stakeholder fragmentation, government ideology/political will and public pressure. Few stakeholders considered potential risks of policy actions, particularly of non-nutritive sweetener substitution or opportunity costs for other policies. CONCLUSIONS: Most of Australia’s policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption are reductionist. Preferencing nutrient specific, first-order policy actions could reflect the influence of vested interests, a historically dominant reductionist orientation to nutrition science and policy, and the perceived difficulty of pursuing second- or third-order changes. Pursuing only first-order policy actions could lead to ‘regrettable’ substitutions and creates an opportunity cost for more comprehensive policy aimed at adjusting the broader food system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9991626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99916262023-03-08 What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study Russell, Cherie Baker, Phillip Grimes, Carley Lawrence, Mark Andrew Public Health Nutr Research Paper OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to critically analyse Australia’s current and proposed policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption. Over-consumption of added sugar is a significant public health nutrition issue. The competing interests, values and beliefs among stakeholders mean they have disparate views regarding which policy actions are preferable to reduce added sugar consumption. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews using purposive, snowball sampling and policy mapping. Policy actions were classified by two frameworks: NOURISHING (e.g. behaviour change communication, food environment and food system) and the Orders of Change (e.g. first order: technical adjustments, second order: reforming the system, third order: transforming the system). SETTING: Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two stakeholders from the food industry, food regulation, government, public health groups and academia. RESULTS: All proposed and existing policy actions targeted the food environment/behaviour change; most were assessed as first-order changes, and reductionist (nutrient specific) in nature. Influences on policy actions included industry power, stakeholder fragmentation, government ideology/political will and public pressure. Few stakeholders considered potential risks of policy actions, particularly of non-nutritive sweetener substitution or opportunity costs for other policies. CONCLUSIONS: Most of Australia’s policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption are reductionist. Preferencing nutrient specific, first-order policy actions could reflect the influence of vested interests, a historically dominant reductionist orientation to nutrition science and policy, and the perceived difficulty of pursuing second- or third-order changes. Pursuing only first-order policy actions could lead to ‘regrettable’ substitutions and creates an opportunity cost for more comprehensive policy aimed at adjusting the broader food system. Cambridge University Press 2022-07 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9991626/ /pubmed/35067254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022000234 Text en © The Authors 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Russell, Cherie Baker, Phillip Grimes, Carley Lawrence, Mark Andrew What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study |
title | What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study |
title_full | What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study |
title_fullStr | What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study |
title_full_unstemmed | What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study |
title_short | What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study |
title_sort | what are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? an australian case study |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022000234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT russellcherie whatarethebenefitsandrisksofnutritionpolicyactionstoreduceaddedsugarconsumptionanaustraliancasestudy AT bakerphillip whatarethebenefitsandrisksofnutritionpolicyactionstoreduceaddedsugarconsumptionanaustraliancasestudy AT grimescarley whatarethebenefitsandrisksofnutritionpolicyactionstoreduceaddedsugarconsumptionanaustraliancasestudy AT lawrencemarkandrew whatarethebenefitsandrisksofnutritionpolicyactionstoreduceaddedsugarconsumptionanaustraliancasestudy |