Cargando…

What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to critically analyse Australia’s current and proposed policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption. Over-consumption of added sugar is a significant public health nutrition issue. The competing interests, values and beliefs among stakeholders mean they have disparate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russell, Cherie, Baker, Phillip, Grimes, Carley, Lawrence, Mark Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022000234
_version_ 1784902191779151872
author Russell, Cherie
Baker, Phillip
Grimes, Carley
Lawrence, Mark Andrew
author_facet Russell, Cherie
Baker, Phillip
Grimes, Carley
Lawrence, Mark Andrew
author_sort Russell, Cherie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to critically analyse Australia’s current and proposed policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption. Over-consumption of added sugar is a significant public health nutrition issue. The competing interests, values and beliefs among stakeholders mean they have disparate views regarding which policy actions are preferable to reduce added sugar consumption. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews using purposive, snowball sampling and policy mapping. Policy actions were classified by two frameworks: NOURISHING (e.g. behaviour change communication, food environment and food system) and the Orders of Change (e.g. first order: technical adjustments, second order: reforming the system, third order: transforming the system). SETTING: Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two stakeholders from the food industry, food regulation, government, public health groups and academia. RESULTS: All proposed and existing policy actions targeted the food environment/behaviour change; most were assessed as first-order changes, and reductionist (nutrient specific) in nature. Influences on policy actions included industry power, stakeholder fragmentation, government ideology/political will and public pressure. Few stakeholders considered potential risks of policy actions, particularly of non-nutritive sweetener substitution or opportunity costs for other policies. CONCLUSIONS: Most of Australia’s policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption are reductionist. Preferencing nutrient specific, first-order policy actions could reflect the influence of vested interests, a historically dominant reductionist orientation to nutrition science and policy, and the perceived difficulty of pursuing second- or third-order changes. Pursuing only first-order policy actions could lead to ‘regrettable’ substitutions and creates an opportunity cost for more comprehensive policy aimed at adjusting the broader food system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9991626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99916262023-03-08 What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study Russell, Cherie Baker, Phillip Grimes, Carley Lawrence, Mark Andrew Public Health Nutr Research Paper OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to critically analyse Australia’s current and proposed policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption. Over-consumption of added sugar is a significant public health nutrition issue. The competing interests, values and beliefs among stakeholders mean they have disparate views regarding which policy actions are preferable to reduce added sugar consumption. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews using purposive, snowball sampling and policy mapping. Policy actions were classified by two frameworks: NOURISHING (e.g. behaviour change communication, food environment and food system) and the Orders of Change (e.g. first order: technical adjustments, second order: reforming the system, third order: transforming the system). SETTING: Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two stakeholders from the food industry, food regulation, government, public health groups and academia. RESULTS: All proposed and existing policy actions targeted the food environment/behaviour change; most were assessed as first-order changes, and reductionist (nutrient specific) in nature. Influences on policy actions included industry power, stakeholder fragmentation, government ideology/political will and public pressure. Few stakeholders considered potential risks of policy actions, particularly of non-nutritive sweetener substitution or opportunity costs for other policies. CONCLUSIONS: Most of Australia’s policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption are reductionist. Preferencing nutrient specific, first-order policy actions could reflect the influence of vested interests, a historically dominant reductionist orientation to nutrition science and policy, and the perceived difficulty of pursuing second- or third-order changes. Pursuing only first-order policy actions could lead to ‘regrettable’ substitutions and creates an opportunity cost for more comprehensive policy aimed at adjusting the broader food system. Cambridge University Press 2022-07 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9991626/ /pubmed/35067254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022000234 Text en © The Authors 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Russell, Cherie
Baker, Phillip
Grimes, Carley
Lawrence, Mark Andrew
What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study
title What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study
title_full What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study
title_fullStr What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study
title_full_unstemmed What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study
title_short What are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? An Australian case study
title_sort what are the benefits and risks of nutrition policy actions to reduce added sugar consumption? an australian case study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022000234
work_keys_str_mv AT russellcherie whatarethebenefitsandrisksofnutritionpolicyactionstoreduceaddedsugarconsumptionanaustraliancasestudy
AT bakerphillip whatarethebenefitsandrisksofnutritionpolicyactionstoreduceaddedsugarconsumptionanaustraliancasestudy
AT grimescarley whatarethebenefitsandrisksofnutritionpolicyactionstoreduceaddedsugarconsumptionanaustraliancasestudy
AT lawrencemarkandrew whatarethebenefitsandrisksofnutritionpolicyactionstoreduceaddedsugarconsumptionanaustraliancasestudy