Cargando…

Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of breast cancer

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies on the association between glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) in relation to breast cancer risk are contradictory. The aim of this study was to examine the association between dietary GI and GL and risk of breast cancer in Iranian women. DESIGN: Population-based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rigi, Somaye, Salari-Moghaddam, Asma, Benisi-Kohansal, Sanaz, Azadbakht, Leila, Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021004018
_version_ 1784902194019958784
author Rigi, Somaye
Salari-Moghaddam, Asma
Benisi-Kohansal, Sanaz
Azadbakht, Leila
Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad
author_facet Rigi, Somaye
Salari-Moghaddam, Asma
Benisi-Kohansal, Sanaz
Azadbakht, Leila
Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad
author_sort Rigi, Somaye
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Previous studies on the association between glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) in relation to breast cancer risk are contradictory. The aim of this study was to examine the association between dietary GI and GL and risk of breast cancer in Iranian women. DESIGN: Population-based case–control study. Dietary GI and GL were assessed using a validated Willett-format 106-item semi-quantitative FFQ. SETTING: Isfahan, Iran. PARTICIPANTS: Cases were 350 patients with newly diagnosed stage I–IV breast cancer, for whom the status of breast cancer was confirmed by physical examination and mammography. Controls were 700 age-matched apparently healthy individuals who were randomly selected from general population. RESULTS: After controlling for potential confounders, individuals in the highest tertile of dietary GI had 47 % higher odds of breast cancer than women in the lowest tertile (OR: 1·47; (95 % CI 1·02, 2·12)). Stratified analysis by menopausal status showed such association among postmenopausal women (OR: 1·51; (95 % CI 1·02, 2·23)). We found no significant association between dietary GL and odds of breast cancer either before (OR: 1·35; (95 % CI 0·99, 1·84)) or after adjustment for potential confounders (OR: 1·24; (95 % CI 0·86, 1·79)). In addition, stratified analysis by menopausal status revealed no significant association between dietary GL and odds of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed a significant positive association between dietary GI and odds of breast cancer. However, we observed no significant association between dietary GL and odds of breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9991635
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99916352023-03-08 Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of breast cancer Rigi, Somaye Salari-Moghaddam, Asma Benisi-Kohansal, Sanaz Azadbakht, Leila Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad Public Health Nutr Research Paper OBJECTIVE: Previous studies on the association between glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) in relation to breast cancer risk are contradictory. The aim of this study was to examine the association between dietary GI and GL and risk of breast cancer in Iranian women. DESIGN: Population-based case–control study. Dietary GI and GL were assessed using a validated Willett-format 106-item semi-quantitative FFQ. SETTING: Isfahan, Iran. PARTICIPANTS: Cases were 350 patients with newly diagnosed stage I–IV breast cancer, for whom the status of breast cancer was confirmed by physical examination and mammography. Controls were 700 age-matched apparently healthy individuals who were randomly selected from general population. RESULTS: After controlling for potential confounders, individuals in the highest tertile of dietary GI had 47 % higher odds of breast cancer than women in the lowest tertile (OR: 1·47; (95 % CI 1·02, 2·12)). Stratified analysis by menopausal status showed such association among postmenopausal women (OR: 1·51; (95 % CI 1·02, 2·23)). We found no significant association between dietary GL and odds of breast cancer either before (OR: 1·35; (95 % CI 0·99, 1·84)) or after adjustment for potential confounders (OR: 1·24; (95 % CI 0·86, 1·79)). In addition, stratified analysis by menopausal status revealed no significant association between dietary GL and odds of breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed a significant positive association between dietary GI and odds of breast cancer. However, we observed no significant association between dietary GL and odds of breast cancer. Cambridge University Press 2022-06 2021-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9991635/ /pubmed/34551840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021004018 Text en © The Authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Rigi, Somaye
Salari-Moghaddam, Asma
Benisi-Kohansal, Sanaz
Azadbakht, Leila
Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad
Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of breast cancer
title Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of breast cancer
title_full Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of breast cancer
title_fullStr Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of breast cancer
title_short Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of breast cancer
title_sort dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of breast cancer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991635/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34551840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021004018
work_keys_str_mv AT rigisomaye dietaryglycaemicindexandglycaemicloadinrelationtoriskofbreastcancer
AT salarimoghaddamasma dietaryglycaemicindexandglycaemicloadinrelationtoriskofbreastcancer
AT benisikohansalsanaz dietaryglycaemicindexandglycaemicloadinrelationtoriskofbreastcancer
AT azadbakhtleila dietaryglycaemicindexandglycaemicloadinrelationtoriskofbreastcancer
AT esmaillzadehahmad dietaryglycaemicindexandglycaemicloadinrelationtoriskofbreastcancer