Cargando…

The influence of item order of the Household Food Security Survey Module on the assessment of food insecurity in households with children

OBJECTIVE: Changes in the item order of the US Household Food Security Survey Module (USHFSSM) were performed throughout time. This study aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the general and specific factors of the 2000 and 2012 versions of the USHFSSM to measure the construct of food ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maia, Isabel, Severo, Milton, Lopes, Carla, Santos, Ana Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022001239
_version_ 1784902233929809920
author Maia, Isabel
Severo, Milton
Lopes, Carla
Santos, Ana Cristina
author_facet Maia, Isabel
Severo, Milton
Lopes, Carla
Santos, Ana Cristina
author_sort Maia, Isabel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Changes in the item order of the US Household Food Security Survey Module (USHFSSM) were performed throughout time. This study aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the general and specific factors of the 2000 and 2012 versions of the USHFSSM to measure the construct of food insecurity in two Portuguese samples of households with children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Portugal. PARTICIPANTS: An adaptation of the 2000 version was applied to 839 adults (from households with children aged 7–17 years) from the National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2015–2016, while the 2012 version was used among 2855 families from the Generation XXI birth cohort. RESULTS: The 2000 version showed to have a stronger ωh than the 2012 version (0·89 v. 0·78 for the general factor), as well as eigenvalues higher than 1 for the general factor (eigenvalues equal to 9·54, 0·97 and 0·80, for the general factor, specific factor 1 and specific factor 2, respectively), while the 2012 version had also the contribution of specific factors to explain food insecurity (eigenvalues equal to 9·40, 2·40 and 1·20, for general factor and specific factors 1 and 2, respectively). Good internal consistency (ωt = 0·99, for both versions) was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the 2000 and 2012 versions of the USHFSSM showed good psychometric properties; however, the 2000 version has stronger general factor, while the 2012 version also has the contribution of specific factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9991806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99918062023-03-08 The influence of item order of the Household Food Security Survey Module on the assessment of food insecurity in households with children Maia, Isabel Severo, Milton Lopes, Carla Santos, Ana Cristina Public Health Nutr Research Paper OBJECTIVE: Changes in the item order of the US Household Food Security Survey Module (USHFSSM) were performed throughout time. This study aimed to compare the psychometric properties of the general and specific factors of the 2000 and 2012 versions of the USHFSSM to measure the construct of food insecurity in two Portuguese samples of households with children. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Portugal. PARTICIPANTS: An adaptation of the 2000 version was applied to 839 adults (from households with children aged 7–17 years) from the National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey 2015–2016, while the 2012 version was used among 2855 families from the Generation XXI birth cohort. RESULTS: The 2000 version showed to have a stronger ωh than the 2012 version (0·89 v. 0·78 for the general factor), as well as eigenvalues higher than 1 for the general factor (eigenvalues equal to 9·54, 0·97 and 0·80, for the general factor, specific factor 1 and specific factor 2, respectively), while the 2012 version had also the contribution of specific factors to explain food insecurity (eigenvalues equal to 9·40, 2·40 and 1·20, for general factor and specific factors 1 and 2, respectively). Good internal consistency (ωt = 0·99, for both versions) was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the 2000 and 2012 versions of the USHFSSM showed good psychometric properties; however, the 2000 version has stronger general factor, while the 2012 version also has the contribution of specific factors. Cambridge University Press 2022-09 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9991806/ /pubmed/35603679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022001239 Text en © The Authors 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Maia, Isabel
Severo, Milton
Lopes, Carla
Santos, Ana Cristina
The influence of item order of the Household Food Security Survey Module on the assessment of food insecurity in households with children
title The influence of item order of the Household Food Security Survey Module on the assessment of food insecurity in households with children
title_full The influence of item order of the Household Food Security Survey Module on the assessment of food insecurity in households with children
title_fullStr The influence of item order of the Household Food Security Survey Module on the assessment of food insecurity in households with children
title_full_unstemmed The influence of item order of the Household Food Security Survey Module on the assessment of food insecurity in households with children
title_short The influence of item order of the Household Food Security Survey Module on the assessment of food insecurity in households with children
title_sort influence of item order of the household food security survey module on the assessment of food insecurity in households with children
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980022001239
work_keys_str_mv AT maiaisabel theinfluenceofitemorderofthehouseholdfoodsecuritysurveymoduleontheassessmentoffoodinsecurityinhouseholdswithchildren
AT severomilton theinfluenceofitemorderofthehouseholdfoodsecuritysurveymoduleontheassessmentoffoodinsecurityinhouseholdswithchildren
AT lopescarla theinfluenceofitemorderofthehouseholdfoodsecuritysurveymoduleontheassessmentoffoodinsecurityinhouseholdswithchildren
AT santosanacristina theinfluenceofitemorderofthehouseholdfoodsecuritysurveymoduleontheassessmentoffoodinsecurityinhouseholdswithchildren
AT maiaisabel influenceofitemorderofthehouseholdfoodsecuritysurveymoduleontheassessmentoffoodinsecurityinhouseholdswithchildren
AT severomilton influenceofitemorderofthehouseholdfoodsecuritysurveymoduleontheassessmentoffoodinsecurityinhouseholdswithchildren
AT lopescarla influenceofitemorderofthehouseholdfoodsecuritysurveymoduleontheassessmentoffoodinsecurityinhouseholdswithchildren
AT santosanacristina influenceofitemorderofthehouseholdfoodsecuritysurveymoduleontheassessmentoffoodinsecurityinhouseholdswithchildren