Cargando…

Effect of a conditional cash transference program on food insecurity in Mexican households: 2012–2016

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of the social inclusion programme PROSPERA on food insecurity (FI) in Mexican households during 2012 and 2016. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study using cross-sectional data from 2012 to 2016 National Household Income and Expenditure Survey – Socioeconomic Conditions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saldivar-Frausto, Mariana, Unar-Munguía, Mishel, Méndez-Gómez-Humarán, Ignacio, Rodríguez-Ramírez, Sonia, Shamah-Levy, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021003918
_version_ 1784902236732653568
author Saldivar-Frausto, Mariana
Unar-Munguía, Mishel
Méndez-Gómez-Humarán, Ignacio
Rodríguez-Ramírez, Sonia
Shamah-Levy, Teresa
author_facet Saldivar-Frausto, Mariana
Unar-Munguía, Mishel
Méndez-Gómez-Humarán, Ignacio
Rodríguez-Ramírez, Sonia
Shamah-Levy, Teresa
author_sort Saldivar-Frausto, Mariana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of the social inclusion programme PROSPERA on food insecurity (FI) in Mexican households during 2012 and 2016. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study using cross-sectional data from 2012 to 2016 National Household Income and Expenditure Survey – Socioeconomic Conditions Module (in Spanish, ENIGH-MCS). SETTING: Data were used from a 2012 sample of 56 888 Mexican households (representative of 31 206 819 households) and a 2016 sample of 70 263 Mexican households (representative of 33 445 353 households). Severity of FI was estimated with the Mexican Food Security Scale (in Spanish, EMSA). The statistical analysis estimated a differences in differences (DD) model weighted by propensity score to compare program beneficiary and non-beneficiary households in 2012 than in 2016. We estimated the effect on households with and without children (< 18 years of age). We also compared this model to a DD model without propensity score weighting. PARTICIPANTS: Mexican households. RESULTS: FI among all beneficiary households decreased 8·0pp as compared to non-beneficiary households over the study period. In beneficiary households with children, this decrease was 6·0pp and for beneficiary households without children, this decrease was 12·9pp (for all, P-value < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: The PROSPERA program had a positive effect on FI reduction at the household level through increasing food access, which usually improves nutritional outcomes in vulnerable Mexican populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9991821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99918212023-03-08 Effect of a conditional cash transference program on food insecurity in Mexican households: 2012–2016 Saldivar-Frausto, Mariana Unar-Munguía, Mishel Méndez-Gómez-Humarán, Ignacio Rodríguez-Ramírez, Sonia Shamah-Levy, Teresa Public Health Nutr Research Paper OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effects of the social inclusion programme PROSPERA on food insecurity (FI) in Mexican households during 2012 and 2016. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study using cross-sectional data from 2012 to 2016 National Household Income and Expenditure Survey – Socioeconomic Conditions Module (in Spanish, ENIGH-MCS). SETTING: Data were used from a 2012 sample of 56 888 Mexican households (representative of 31 206 819 households) and a 2016 sample of 70 263 Mexican households (representative of 33 445 353 households). Severity of FI was estimated with the Mexican Food Security Scale (in Spanish, EMSA). The statistical analysis estimated a differences in differences (DD) model weighted by propensity score to compare program beneficiary and non-beneficiary households in 2012 than in 2016. We estimated the effect on households with and without children (< 18 years of age). We also compared this model to a DD model without propensity score weighting. PARTICIPANTS: Mexican households. RESULTS: FI among all beneficiary households decreased 8·0pp as compared to non-beneficiary households over the study period. In beneficiary households with children, this decrease was 6·0pp and for beneficiary households without children, this decrease was 12·9pp (for all, P-value < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: The PROSPERA program had a positive effect on FI reduction at the household level through increasing food access, which usually improves nutritional outcomes in vulnerable Mexican populations. Cambridge University Press 2022-04 2021-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9991821/ /pubmed/34497003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021003918 Text en © The Authors 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Saldivar-Frausto, Mariana
Unar-Munguía, Mishel
Méndez-Gómez-Humarán, Ignacio
Rodríguez-Ramírez, Sonia
Shamah-Levy, Teresa
Effect of a conditional cash transference program on food insecurity in Mexican households: 2012–2016
title Effect of a conditional cash transference program on food insecurity in Mexican households: 2012–2016
title_full Effect of a conditional cash transference program on food insecurity in Mexican households: 2012–2016
title_fullStr Effect of a conditional cash transference program on food insecurity in Mexican households: 2012–2016
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a conditional cash transference program on food insecurity in Mexican households: 2012–2016
title_short Effect of a conditional cash transference program on food insecurity in Mexican households: 2012–2016
title_sort effect of a conditional cash transference program on food insecurity in mexican households: 2012–2016
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9991821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021003918
work_keys_str_mv AT saldivarfraustomariana effectofaconditionalcashtransferenceprogramonfoodinsecurityinmexicanhouseholds20122016
AT unarmunguiamishel effectofaconditionalcashtransferenceprogramonfoodinsecurityinmexicanhouseholds20122016
AT mendezgomezhumaranignacio effectofaconditionalcashtransferenceprogramonfoodinsecurityinmexicanhouseholds20122016
AT rodriguezramirezsonia effectofaconditionalcashtransferenceprogramonfoodinsecurityinmexicanhouseholds20122016
AT shamahlevyteresa effectofaconditionalcashtransferenceprogramonfoodinsecurityinmexicanhouseholds20122016