Cargando…

Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults

Prior work with hearing children acquiring a spoken language as their first language shows that spatial language and cognition are related systems and spatial language use predicts spatial memory. Here, we further investigate the extent of this relationship in signing deaf children and adults and as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karadöller, Dilay Z., Sümer, Beyza, Ünal, Ercenur, Özyürek, Aslı
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35301680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01281-7
_version_ 1784902257458806784
author Karadöller, Dilay Z.
Sümer, Beyza
Ünal, Ercenur
Özyürek, Aslı
author_facet Karadöller, Dilay Z.
Sümer, Beyza
Ünal, Ercenur
Özyürek, Aslı
author_sort Karadöller, Dilay Z.
collection PubMed
description Prior work with hearing children acquiring a spoken language as their first language shows that spatial language and cognition are related systems and spatial language use predicts spatial memory. Here, we further investigate the extent of this relationship in signing deaf children and adults and ask if late sign language exposure, as well as the frequency and the type of spatial language use that might be affected by late exposure, modulate subsequent memory for spatial relations. To do so, we compared spatial language and memory of 8-year-old late-signing children (after 2 years of exposure to a sign language at the school for the deaf) and late-signing adults to their native-signing counterparts. We elicited picture descriptions of Left-Right relations in Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili) and measured the subsequent recognition memory accuracy of the described pictures. Results showed that late-signing adults and children were similar to their native-signing counterparts in how often they encoded the spatial relation. However, late-signing adults but not children differed from their native-signing counterparts in the type of spatial language they used. However, neither late sign language exposure nor the frequency and type of spatial language use modulated spatial memory accuracy. Therefore, even though late language exposure seems to influence the type of spatial language use, this does not predict subsequent memory for spatial relations. We discuss the implications of these findings based on the theories concerning the correspondence between spatial language and cognition as related or rather independent systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9992020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99920202023-03-09 Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults Karadöller, Dilay Z. Sümer, Beyza Ünal, Ercenur Özyürek, Aslı Mem Cognit Article Prior work with hearing children acquiring a spoken language as their first language shows that spatial language and cognition are related systems and spatial language use predicts spatial memory. Here, we further investigate the extent of this relationship in signing deaf children and adults and ask if late sign language exposure, as well as the frequency and the type of spatial language use that might be affected by late exposure, modulate subsequent memory for spatial relations. To do so, we compared spatial language and memory of 8-year-old late-signing children (after 2 years of exposure to a sign language at the school for the deaf) and late-signing adults to their native-signing counterparts. We elicited picture descriptions of Left-Right relations in Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili) and measured the subsequent recognition memory accuracy of the described pictures. Results showed that late-signing adults and children were similar to their native-signing counterparts in how often they encoded the spatial relation. However, late-signing adults but not children differed from their native-signing counterparts in the type of spatial language they used. However, neither late sign language exposure nor the frequency and type of spatial language use modulated spatial memory accuracy. Therefore, even though late language exposure seems to influence the type of spatial language use, this does not predict subsequent memory for spatial relations. We discuss the implications of these findings based on the theories concerning the correspondence between spatial language and cognition as related or rather independent systems. Springer US 2022-03-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9992020/ /pubmed/35301680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01281-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Karadöller, Dilay Z.
Sümer, Beyza
Ünal, Ercenur
Özyürek, Aslı
Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults
title Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults
title_full Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults
title_fullStr Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults
title_full_unstemmed Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults
title_short Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults
title_sort late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35301680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01281-7
work_keys_str_mv AT karadollerdilayz latesignlanguageexposuredoesnotmodulatetherelationbetweenspatiallanguageandspatialmemoryindeafchildrenandadults
AT sumerbeyza latesignlanguageexposuredoesnotmodulatetherelationbetweenspatiallanguageandspatialmemoryindeafchildrenandadults
AT unalercenur latesignlanguageexposuredoesnotmodulatetherelationbetweenspatiallanguageandspatialmemoryindeafchildrenandadults
AT ozyurekaslı latesignlanguageexposuredoesnotmodulatetherelationbetweenspatiallanguageandspatialmemoryindeafchildrenandadults