Cargando…
Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data
PURPOSE: The objective of the current study was to develop and test the performances of different ML algorithms which were trained using patient-reported symptom severity data to predict mortality within 180 days for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We randomly selected 630 of 689 patients wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y |
_version_ | 1784902259483607040 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Cai Subbiah, Ishwaria M. Lu, Sheng-Chieh Pfob, André Sidey-Gibbons, Chris |
author_facet | Xu, Cai Subbiah, Ishwaria M. Lu, Sheng-Chieh Pfob, André Sidey-Gibbons, Chris |
author_sort | Xu, Cai |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The objective of the current study was to develop and test the performances of different ML algorithms which were trained using patient-reported symptom severity data to predict mortality within 180 days for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We randomly selected 630 of 689 patients with advanced cancer at our institution who completed symptom PRO measures as part of routine care between 2009 and 2020. Using clinical, demographic, and PRO data, we trained and tested four ML algorithms: generalized regression with elastic net regularization (GLM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) trees, support vector machines (SVM), and a single hidden layer neural network (NNET). We assessed the performance of algorithms individually as well as part of an unweighted voting ensemble on the hold-out testing sample. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: The starting cohort of 630 patients was randomly partitioned into training (n = 504) and testing (n = 126) samples. Of the four ML models, the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated the best performance for 180-day mortality prediction in testing data (AUROC = 0.69, sensitivity = 0.68, specificity = 0.62, PPV = 0.66, NPV = 0.64). Ensemble of all algorithms performed worst (AUROC = 0.65, sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.62, PPV = 0.65, NPV = 0.62). Of individual PRO symptoms, shortness of breath emerged as the variable of highest impact on the XGBoost 180-mortality prediction (1-AUROC = 0.30). CONCLUSION: Our findings support ML models driven by patient-reported symptom severity as accurate predictors of short-term mortality in patients with advanced cancer, highlighting the opportunity to integrate these models prospectively into future studies of goal-concordant care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9992030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99920302023-03-09 Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data Xu, Cai Subbiah, Ishwaria M. Lu, Sheng-Chieh Pfob, André Sidey-Gibbons, Chris Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The objective of the current study was to develop and test the performances of different ML algorithms which were trained using patient-reported symptom severity data to predict mortality within 180 days for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We randomly selected 630 of 689 patients with advanced cancer at our institution who completed symptom PRO measures as part of routine care between 2009 and 2020. Using clinical, demographic, and PRO data, we trained and tested four ML algorithms: generalized regression with elastic net regularization (GLM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) trees, support vector machines (SVM), and a single hidden layer neural network (NNET). We assessed the performance of algorithms individually as well as part of an unweighted voting ensemble on the hold-out testing sample. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: The starting cohort of 630 patients was randomly partitioned into training (n = 504) and testing (n = 126) samples. Of the four ML models, the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated the best performance for 180-day mortality prediction in testing data (AUROC = 0.69, sensitivity = 0.68, specificity = 0.62, PPV = 0.66, NPV = 0.64). Ensemble of all algorithms performed worst (AUROC = 0.65, sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.62, PPV = 0.65, NPV = 0.62). Of individual PRO symptoms, shortness of breath emerged as the variable of highest impact on the XGBoost 180-mortality prediction (1-AUROC = 0.30). CONCLUSION: Our findings support ML models driven by patient-reported symptom severity as accurate predictors of short-term mortality in patients with advanced cancer, highlighting the opportunity to integrate these models prospectively into future studies of goal-concordant care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9992030/ /pubmed/36308591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Xu, Cai Subbiah, Ishwaria M. Lu, Sheng-Chieh Pfob, André Sidey-Gibbons, Chris Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data |
title | Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data |
title_full | Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data |
title_fullStr | Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data |
title_short | Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data |
title_sort | machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xucai machinelearningmodelsfor180daymortalitypredictionofpatientswithadvancedcancerusingpatientreportedsymptomdata AT subbiahishwariam machinelearningmodelsfor180daymortalitypredictionofpatientswithadvancedcancerusingpatientreportedsymptomdata AT lushengchieh machinelearningmodelsfor180daymortalitypredictionofpatientswithadvancedcancerusingpatientreportedsymptomdata AT pfobandre machinelearningmodelsfor180daymortalitypredictionofpatientswithadvancedcancerusingpatientreportedsymptomdata AT sideygibbonschris machinelearningmodelsfor180daymortalitypredictionofpatientswithadvancedcancerusingpatientreportedsymptomdata |