Cargando…

Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data

PURPOSE: The objective of the current study was to develop and test the performances of different ML algorithms which were trained using patient-reported symptom severity data to predict mortality within 180 days for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We randomly selected 630 of 689 patients wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Cai, Subbiah, Ishwaria M., Lu, Sheng-Chieh, Pfob, André, Sidey-Gibbons, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y
_version_ 1784902259483607040
author Xu, Cai
Subbiah, Ishwaria M.
Lu, Sheng-Chieh
Pfob, André
Sidey-Gibbons, Chris
author_facet Xu, Cai
Subbiah, Ishwaria M.
Lu, Sheng-Chieh
Pfob, André
Sidey-Gibbons, Chris
author_sort Xu, Cai
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective of the current study was to develop and test the performances of different ML algorithms which were trained using patient-reported symptom severity data to predict mortality within 180 days for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We randomly selected 630 of 689 patients with advanced cancer at our institution who completed symptom PRO measures as part of routine care between 2009 and 2020. Using clinical, demographic, and PRO data, we trained and tested four ML algorithms: generalized regression with elastic net regularization (GLM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) trees, support vector machines (SVM), and a single hidden layer neural network (NNET). We assessed the performance of algorithms individually as well as part of an unweighted voting ensemble on the hold-out testing sample. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: The starting cohort of 630 patients was randomly partitioned into training (n = 504) and testing (n = 126) samples. Of the four ML models, the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated the best performance for 180-day mortality prediction in testing data (AUROC = 0.69, sensitivity = 0.68, specificity = 0.62, PPV = 0.66, NPV = 0.64). Ensemble of all algorithms performed worst (AUROC = 0.65, sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.62, PPV = 0.65, NPV = 0.62). Of individual PRO symptoms, shortness of breath emerged as the variable of highest impact on the XGBoost 180-mortality prediction (1-AUROC = 0.30). CONCLUSION: Our findings support ML models driven by patient-reported symptom severity as accurate predictors of short-term mortality in patients with advanced cancer, highlighting the opportunity to integrate these models prospectively into future studies of goal-concordant care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9992030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99920302023-03-09 Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data Xu, Cai Subbiah, Ishwaria M. Lu, Sheng-Chieh Pfob, André Sidey-Gibbons, Chris Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: The objective of the current study was to develop and test the performances of different ML algorithms which were trained using patient-reported symptom severity data to predict mortality within 180 days for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: We randomly selected 630 of 689 patients with advanced cancer at our institution who completed symptom PRO measures as part of routine care between 2009 and 2020. Using clinical, demographic, and PRO data, we trained and tested four ML algorithms: generalized regression with elastic net regularization (GLM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) trees, support vector machines (SVM), and a single hidden layer neural network (NNET). We assessed the performance of algorithms individually as well as part of an unweighted voting ensemble on the hold-out testing sample. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: The starting cohort of 630 patients was randomly partitioned into training (n = 504) and testing (n = 126) samples. Of the four ML models, the XGBoost algorithm demonstrated the best performance for 180-day mortality prediction in testing data (AUROC = 0.69, sensitivity = 0.68, specificity = 0.62, PPV = 0.66, NPV = 0.64). Ensemble of all algorithms performed worst (AUROC = 0.65, sensitivity = 0.65, specificity = 0.62, PPV = 0.65, NPV = 0.62). Of individual PRO symptoms, shortness of breath emerged as the variable of highest impact on the XGBoost 180-mortality prediction (1-AUROC = 0.30). CONCLUSION: Our findings support ML models driven by patient-reported symptom severity as accurate predictors of short-term mortality in patients with advanced cancer, highlighting the opportunity to integrate these models prospectively into future studies of goal-concordant care. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-29 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9992030/ /pubmed/36308591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Xu, Cai
Subbiah, Ishwaria M.
Lu, Sheng-Chieh
Pfob, André
Sidey-Gibbons, Chris
Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data
title Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data
title_full Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data
title_fullStr Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data
title_short Machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data
title_sort machine learning models for 180-day mortality prediction of patients with advanced cancer using patient-reported symptom data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36308591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03284-y
work_keys_str_mv AT xucai machinelearningmodelsfor180daymortalitypredictionofpatientswithadvancedcancerusingpatientreportedsymptomdata
AT subbiahishwariam machinelearningmodelsfor180daymortalitypredictionofpatientswithadvancedcancerusingpatientreportedsymptomdata
AT lushengchieh machinelearningmodelsfor180daymortalitypredictionofpatientswithadvancedcancerusingpatientreportedsymptomdata
AT pfobandre machinelearningmodelsfor180daymortalitypredictionofpatientswithadvancedcancerusingpatientreportedsymptomdata
AT sideygibbonschris machinelearningmodelsfor180daymortalitypredictionofpatientswithadvancedcancerusingpatientreportedsymptomdata