Cargando…
Changes in plant nutrient status following combined elevated [CO(2)] and canopy warming in winter wheat
Projected global climate change is a potential threat to nutrient utilization in agroecosystems. However, the combined effects of elevated [CO(2)] and canopy warming on plant nutrient concentrations and translocations are not well understood. Here we conducted an open-air field experiment to investi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909423 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1132414 |
Sumario: | Projected global climate change is a potential threat to nutrient utilization in agroecosystems. However, the combined effects of elevated [CO(2)] and canopy warming on plant nutrient concentrations and translocations are not well understood. Here we conducted an open-air field experiment to investigate the impact of factorial elevated [CO(2)] (up to 500 μmol mol(-1)) and canopy air warming (+2°C) on nutrient (N, P, and K) status during the wheat growing season in a winter wheat field. Compared to ambient conditions, soil nutrient status was generally unchanged under elevated [CO(2)] and canopy warming. In contrast, elevated [CO(2)] decreased K concentrations by 11.0% and 11.5% in plant shoot and root, respectively, but had no impact on N or P concentration. Canopy warming increased shoot N, P and K concentrations by 8.9%, 7.5% and 15.0%, but decreased root N, P, and K concentrations by 12.3%, 9.0% and 31.6%, respectively. Accordingly, canopy warming rather than elevated [CO(2)] increased respectively N, P and K transfer coefficients (defined as the ratio of nutrient concentrations in the shoot to root) by 22.2%, 27.9% and 84.3%, which illustrated that canopy warming played a more important role in nutrient translocation from belowground to aboveground than elevated [CO(2)]. These results suggested that the response of nutrient dynamics was more sensitive in plants than in soil under climate change. |
---|