Cargando…

Image-derived input functions from dynamic (15)O–water PET scans using penalised reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) scans of the brain typically require arterial blood sampling but this is complicated and logistically challenging. One solution to remove the need for arterial blood sampling is the use of image-derived input functions (IDIFs). Obtaining ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Peter, Appel, Lieuwe, Tolf, Andreas, Kosmidis, Savvas, Burman, Joachim, Rieckmann, Anna, Schöll, Michael, Lubberink, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36881266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00535-w
_version_ 1784902316640436224
author Young, Peter
Appel, Lieuwe
Tolf, Andreas
Kosmidis, Savvas
Burman, Joachim
Rieckmann, Anna
Schöll, Michael
Lubberink, Mark
author_facet Young, Peter
Appel, Lieuwe
Tolf, Andreas
Kosmidis, Savvas
Burman, Joachim
Rieckmann, Anna
Schöll, Michael
Lubberink, Mark
author_sort Young, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) scans of the brain typically require arterial blood sampling but this is complicated and logistically challenging. One solution to remove the need for arterial blood sampling is the use of image-derived input functions (IDIFs). Obtaining accurate IDIFs, however, has proved to be challenging, mainly due to the limited resolution of PET. Here, we employ penalised reconstruction alongside iterative thresholding methods and simple partial volume correction methods to produce IDIFs from a single PET scan, and subsequently, compare these to blood-sampled input curves (BSIFs) as ground truth. Retrospectively we used data from sixteen subjects with two dynamic (15)O-labelled water PET scans and continuous arterial blood sampling: one baseline scan and another post-administration of acetazolamide. RESULTS: IDIFs and BSIFs agreed well in terms of the area under the curve of input curves when comparing peaks, tails and peak-to-tail ratios with R(2) values of 0.95, 0.70 and 0.76, respectively. Grey matter cerebral blood flow (CBF) values showed good agreement with an average difference between the BSIF and IDIF CBF values of 2% ± and a coefficient of variation (CoV) of 7.3%. CONCLUSION: Our results show promising results that a robust IDIF can be produced for dynamic (15)O–water PET scans using only the dynamic PET scan images with no need for a corresponding MRI or complex analytical techniques and thereby making routine clinical use of quantitative CBF measurements with (15)O–water feasible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-023-00535-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9992469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99924692023-03-09 Image-derived input functions from dynamic (15)O–water PET scans using penalised reconstruction Young, Peter Appel, Lieuwe Tolf, Andreas Kosmidis, Savvas Burman, Joachim Rieckmann, Anna Schöll, Michael Lubberink, Mark EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) scans of the brain typically require arterial blood sampling but this is complicated and logistically challenging. One solution to remove the need for arterial blood sampling is the use of image-derived input functions (IDIFs). Obtaining accurate IDIFs, however, has proved to be challenging, mainly due to the limited resolution of PET. Here, we employ penalised reconstruction alongside iterative thresholding methods and simple partial volume correction methods to produce IDIFs from a single PET scan, and subsequently, compare these to blood-sampled input curves (BSIFs) as ground truth. Retrospectively we used data from sixteen subjects with two dynamic (15)O-labelled water PET scans and continuous arterial blood sampling: one baseline scan and another post-administration of acetazolamide. RESULTS: IDIFs and BSIFs agreed well in terms of the area under the curve of input curves when comparing peaks, tails and peak-to-tail ratios with R(2) values of 0.95, 0.70 and 0.76, respectively. Grey matter cerebral blood flow (CBF) values showed good agreement with an average difference between the BSIF and IDIF CBF values of 2% ± and a coefficient of variation (CoV) of 7.3%. CONCLUSION: Our results show promising results that a robust IDIF can be produced for dynamic (15)O–water PET scans using only the dynamic PET scan images with no need for a corresponding MRI or complex analytical techniques and thereby making routine clinical use of quantitative CBF measurements with (15)O–water feasible. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-023-00535-w. Springer International Publishing 2023-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9992469/ /pubmed/36881266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00535-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Young, Peter
Appel, Lieuwe
Tolf, Andreas
Kosmidis, Savvas
Burman, Joachim
Rieckmann, Anna
Schöll, Michael
Lubberink, Mark
Image-derived input functions from dynamic (15)O–water PET scans using penalised reconstruction
title Image-derived input functions from dynamic (15)O–water PET scans using penalised reconstruction
title_full Image-derived input functions from dynamic (15)O–water PET scans using penalised reconstruction
title_fullStr Image-derived input functions from dynamic (15)O–water PET scans using penalised reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Image-derived input functions from dynamic (15)O–water PET scans using penalised reconstruction
title_short Image-derived input functions from dynamic (15)O–water PET scans using penalised reconstruction
title_sort image-derived input functions from dynamic (15)o–water pet scans using penalised reconstruction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36881266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00535-w
work_keys_str_mv AT youngpeter imagederivedinputfunctionsfromdynamic15owaterpetscansusingpenalisedreconstruction
AT appellieuwe imagederivedinputfunctionsfromdynamic15owaterpetscansusingpenalisedreconstruction
AT tolfandreas imagederivedinputfunctionsfromdynamic15owaterpetscansusingpenalisedreconstruction
AT kosmidissavvas imagederivedinputfunctionsfromdynamic15owaterpetscansusingpenalisedreconstruction
AT burmanjoachim imagederivedinputfunctionsfromdynamic15owaterpetscansusingpenalisedreconstruction
AT rieckmannanna imagederivedinputfunctionsfromdynamic15owaterpetscansusingpenalisedreconstruction
AT schollmichael imagederivedinputfunctionsfromdynamic15owaterpetscansusingpenalisedreconstruction
AT lubberinkmark imagederivedinputfunctionsfromdynamic15owaterpetscansusingpenalisedreconstruction