Cargando…
Recipient, donor, and surgical factors leading to primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant
BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction is a major cause of early mortality following lung transplantation. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation subdivides it into 4 grades of increasing severity. METHODS: A retrospective review of the institutional lung transplant database fro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910052 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-974 |
_version_ | 1784902337726251008 |
---|---|
author | Toyoda, Takahide Cerier, Emily Jeong Manerikar, Adwaiy Jayant Kandula, Viswajit Bharat, Ankit Kurihara, Chitaru |
author_facet | Toyoda, Takahide Cerier, Emily Jeong Manerikar, Adwaiy Jayant Kandula, Viswajit Bharat, Ankit Kurihara, Chitaru |
author_sort | Toyoda, Takahide |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction is a major cause of early mortality following lung transplantation. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation subdivides it into 4 grades of increasing severity. METHODS: A retrospective review of the institutional lung transplant database from March 2018 to September 2021 was performed. Patients were stratified into three groups: primary graft dysfunction grade 0 patients, grade 1 or 2 patients, and grade 3 patients. Recipient, donor, and surgical variables were analyzed by logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for primary graft dysfunction grade 1 or 2 and grade 3. RESULTS: Primary graft dysfunction grade 1 to 3 occurred in 45.0% of the cohort (n=68) of whom 33.3% (n=23) had primary graft dysfunction grade 3. Longer operative time was more common in primary graft dysfunction grade 1 to 3 patients (P<0.001). The 1-year survival of the patients with primary graft dysfunction grade 3 was lower than the others (grade 0–2 vs. 3, 93.7% vs. 65.2%, P=0.0006). Univariate analysis showed that acute respiratory distress syndrome, operative time, and intraoperative veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use were risk factors for primary graft dysfunction grades 1 or 2 and grade 3. Multivariate analysis identified that intraoperative veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use was an independent risk factor of primary graft dysfunction grade 1 or 2. Patients with an operative time of more than 8.18 hours had significantly higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3, acute kidney injury, and digital ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated predictors of primary graft dysfunction grade 1 or 2 were similar to those of primary graft dysfunction grade 3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9992558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99925582023-03-09 Recipient, donor, and surgical factors leading to primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant Toyoda, Takahide Cerier, Emily Jeong Manerikar, Adwaiy Jayant Kandula, Viswajit Bharat, Ankit Kurihara, Chitaru J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Primary graft dysfunction is a major cause of early mortality following lung transplantation. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation subdivides it into 4 grades of increasing severity. METHODS: A retrospective review of the institutional lung transplant database from March 2018 to September 2021 was performed. Patients were stratified into three groups: primary graft dysfunction grade 0 patients, grade 1 or 2 patients, and grade 3 patients. Recipient, donor, and surgical variables were analyzed by logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for primary graft dysfunction grade 1 or 2 and grade 3. RESULTS: Primary graft dysfunction grade 1 to 3 occurred in 45.0% of the cohort (n=68) of whom 33.3% (n=23) had primary graft dysfunction grade 3. Longer operative time was more common in primary graft dysfunction grade 1 to 3 patients (P<0.001). The 1-year survival of the patients with primary graft dysfunction grade 3 was lower than the others (grade 0–2 vs. 3, 93.7% vs. 65.2%, P=0.0006). Univariate analysis showed that acute respiratory distress syndrome, operative time, and intraoperative veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use were risk factors for primary graft dysfunction grades 1 or 2 and grade 3. Multivariate analysis identified that intraoperative veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use was an independent risk factor of primary graft dysfunction grade 1 or 2. Patients with an operative time of more than 8.18 hours had significantly higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction grade 3, acute kidney injury, and digital ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: The calculated predictors of primary graft dysfunction grade 1 or 2 were similar to those of primary graft dysfunction grade 3. AME Publishing Company 2023-02-07 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9992558/ /pubmed/36910052 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-974 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Toyoda, Takahide Cerier, Emily Jeong Manerikar, Adwaiy Jayant Kandula, Viswajit Bharat, Ankit Kurihara, Chitaru Recipient, donor, and surgical factors leading to primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant |
title | Recipient, donor, and surgical factors leading to primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant |
title_full | Recipient, donor, and surgical factors leading to primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant |
title_fullStr | Recipient, donor, and surgical factors leading to primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant |
title_full_unstemmed | Recipient, donor, and surgical factors leading to primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant |
title_short | Recipient, donor, and surgical factors leading to primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant |
title_sort | recipient, donor, and surgical factors leading to primary graft dysfunction after lung transplant |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910052 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-974 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toyodatakahide recipientdonorandsurgicalfactorsleadingtoprimarygraftdysfunctionafterlungtransplant AT cerieremilyjeong recipientdonorandsurgicalfactorsleadingtoprimarygraftdysfunctionafterlungtransplant AT manerikaradwaiyjayant recipientdonorandsurgicalfactorsleadingtoprimarygraftdysfunctionafterlungtransplant AT kandulaviswajit recipientdonorandsurgicalfactorsleadingtoprimarygraftdysfunctionafterlungtransplant AT bharatankit recipientdonorandsurgicalfactorsleadingtoprimarygraftdysfunctionafterlungtransplant AT kuriharachitaru recipientdonorandsurgicalfactorsleadingtoprimarygraftdysfunctionafterlungtransplant |