Cargando…

Intrathoracic vacuum therapy for the therapy of pleural empyema—a systematic review and analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND: Pleural empyema is a serious and potentially deadly disease leading to a significant burden on health care systems. Conservative and surgical treatment results remain poor, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with pleural empyema are often multimorbid and poor candidates fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stüben, Björn-Ole, Plitzko, Gabriel A., Reeh, Matthias, Melling, Nathaniel, Izbicki, Jakob R., Bachmann, Kai, Tachezy, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910103
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1188
_version_ 1784902347873320960
author Stüben, Björn-Ole
Plitzko, Gabriel A.
Reeh, Matthias
Melling, Nathaniel
Izbicki, Jakob R.
Bachmann, Kai
Tachezy, Michael
author_facet Stüben, Björn-Ole
Plitzko, Gabriel A.
Reeh, Matthias
Melling, Nathaniel
Izbicki, Jakob R.
Bachmann, Kai
Tachezy, Michael
author_sort Stüben, Björn-Ole
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pleural empyema is a serious and potentially deadly disease leading to a significant burden on health care systems. Conservative and surgical treatment results remain poor, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with pleural empyema are often multimorbid and poor candidates for surgery. Therefore, it appears sensible to explore alternative, less invasive treatment options. Recently, the well-established vacuum sponge therapy has been adopted in the treatment of pleural infections. The goal of this systematic review was to identify the existing literature and reported results of vacuum therapy for pleural empyema. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database was performed independently by two reviewers using predefined criteria according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. In addition, abstracts from selected conference proceedings were screened and reference scanning of the search results was performed. Single case reports were excluded. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the selection criteria and were reviewed. A total of 165 patients were treated with vacuum therapy in the studies reviewed. 61.2% of the patients had pleural empyema secondary to thoracic surgery. In 71.5% of the patients, vacuum therapy was applied following open window thoracostomy (OWT). Mortality rates of 0–33% were reported for vacuum therapy after OWT and 0–9.3% for vacuum therapy without OWT. Length of hospital stay (LOHS) ranged from 44–217 days for patients after OWT and could not be analysed for vacuum therapy without OWT due to lacking data. Median treatment time was 7–14 days. Treatment related complications were rare overall. Success rates defined as infection resolution were high irrespective of previous treatment and cause of empyema. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature shows that pleural vacuum therapy is a promising, safe, and feasible treatment alternative to existing treatment modalities for pleural empyema. However, the evidence for vacuum therapy without OWT is poor, and further data, optimally prospective or randomised control trials comparing the conventional surgical approach of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) decortication and minimally invasive vacuum therapy, are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9992597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99925972023-03-09 Intrathoracic vacuum therapy for the therapy of pleural empyema—a systematic review and analysis of the literature Stüben, Björn-Ole Plitzko, Gabriel A. Reeh, Matthias Melling, Nathaniel Izbicki, Jakob R. Bachmann, Kai Tachezy, Michael J Thorac Dis Review Article BACKGROUND: Pleural empyema is a serious and potentially deadly disease leading to a significant burden on health care systems. Conservative and surgical treatment results remain poor, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Patients with pleural empyema are often multimorbid and poor candidates for surgery. Therefore, it appears sensible to explore alternative, less invasive treatment options. Recently, the well-established vacuum sponge therapy has been adopted in the treatment of pleural infections. The goal of this systematic review was to identify the existing literature and reported results of vacuum therapy for pleural empyema. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database was performed independently by two reviewers using predefined criteria according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. In addition, abstracts from selected conference proceedings were screened and reference scanning of the search results was performed. Single case reports were excluded. RESULTS: Fourteen studies met the selection criteria and were reviewed. A total of 165 patients were treated with vacuum therapy in the studies reviewed. 61.2% of the patients had pleural empyema secondary to thoracic surgery. In 71.5% of the patients, vacuum therapy was applied following open window thoracostomy (OWT). Mortality rates of 0–33% were reported for vacuum therapy after OWT and 0–9.3% for vacuum therapy without OWT. Length of hospital stay (LOHS) ranged from 44–217 days for patients after OWT and could not be analysed for vacuum therapy without OWT due to lacking data. Median treatment time was 7–14 days. Treatment related complications were rare overall. Success rates defined as infection resolution were high irrespective of previous treatment and cause of empyema. CONCLUSIONS: The current literature shows that pleural vacuum therapy is a promising, safe, and feasible treatment alternative to existing treatment modalities for pleural empyema. However, the evidence for vacuum therapy without OWT is poor, and further data, optimally prospective or randomised control trials comparing the conventional surgical approach of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) decortication and minimally invasive vacuum therapy, are needed. AME Publishing Company 2023-01-29 2023-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9992597/ /pubmed/36910103 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1188 Text en 2023 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Stüben, Björn-Ole
Plitzko, Gabriel A.
Reeh, Matthias
Melling, Nathaniel
Izbicki, Jakob R.
Bachmann, Kai
Tachezy, Michael
Intrathoracic vacuum therapy for the therapy of pleural empyema—a systematic review and analysis of the literature
title Intrathoracic vacuum therapy for the therapy of pleural empyema—a systematic review and analysis of the literature
title_full Intrathoracic vacuum therapy for the therapy of pleural empyema—a systematic review and analysis of the literature
title_fullStr Intrathoracic vacuum therapy for the therapy of pleural empyema—a systematic review and analysis of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Intrathoracic vacuum therapy for the therapy of pleural empyema—a systematic review and analysis of the literature
title_short Intrathoracic vacuum therapy for the therapy of pleural empyema—a systematic review and analysis of the literature
title_sort intrathoracic vacuum therapy for the therapy of pleural empyema—a systematic review and analysis of the literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910103
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-1188
work_keys_str_mv AT stubenbjornole intrathoracicvacuumtherapyforthetherapyofpleuralempyemaasystematicreviewandanalysisoftheliterature
AT plitzkogabriela intrathoracicvacuumtherapyforthetherapyofpleuralempyemaasystematicreviewandanalysisoftheliterature
AT reehmatthias intrathoracicvacuumtherapyforthetherapyofpleuralempyemaasystematicreviewandanalysisoftheliterature
AT mellingnathaniel intrathoracicvacuumtherapyforthetherapyofpleuralempyemaasystematicreviewandanalysisoftheliterature
AT izbickijakobr intrathoracicvacuumtherapyforthetherapyofpleuralempyemaasystematicreviewandanalysisoftheliterature
AT bachmannkai intrathoracicvacuumtherapyforthetherapyofpleuralempyemaasystematicreviewandanalysisoftheliterature
AT tachezymichael intrathoracicvacuumtherapyforthetherapyofpleuralempyemaasystematicreviewandanalysisoftheliterature