Cargando…

Prolonged air leak after robotic lung resection: a narrative review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prolonged air leak (PAL) following lung resection is related to an increase in morbidity and both direct and indirect costs. In recent years, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has proved to be a safe technique with comparable perioperative outcomes of video-assisted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muriana, Piergiorgio, Rossetti, Francesca, Viscardi, Stefano, Novellis, Pierluigi, Veronesi, Giulia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9992620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910080
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-818
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prolonged air leak (PAL) following lung resection is related to an increase in morbidity and both direct and indirect costs. In recent years, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has proved to be a safe technique with comparable perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), optimal oncological results, and potential advantages in case of sublobar resection. We here focus on the incidence and clinical impact of PAL in the field of robotic surgery and discuss the therapeutic strategies currently available. METHODS: We conducted a search on PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus database from inception until May 27(th) 2022 to select the relevant literature published in English exploring the occurrence of PAL following RATS. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The implementation of robotic surgery led to a significant reduction in PAL occurrence after pulmonary resection compared to open thoracotomy, while there is still no clear advantage with respect to VATS. However, the enhanced dexterity and improved visualization of the robot seem to particularly valuable in case of sublobar lung resection, especially complex ones. Accurate selection of patients based on the presence of risk factors allows the implementation of intraoperative measures in order to reduce the occurrence of PAL. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic lung resection is a safe technique, advantageous compared to traditional open thoracotomy in terms of PAL occurrence reduction and it is a valid alternative to manual VATS. Moreover, with the extension of indications for sublobar resection in the treatment of early stage lung cancer, RATS may prove to be the technique of choice thanks to its intrinsic advantages.