Cargando…
Efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis remains controversial. AIM: We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of apremilast on treatment efficacy for psoriasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Coc...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909912 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2022.119081 |
_version_ | 1784902482175983616 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yashu Li, Yuting Du, Hanghang |
author_facet | Liu, Yashu Li, Yuting Du, Hanghang |
author_sort | Liu, Yashu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis remains controversial. AIM: We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of apremilast on treatment efficacy for psoriasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until February 2022 and assessing the efficacy and safety of apremilast for psoriasis. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with placebo for psoriasis, apremilast was associated with improved PASI-75 (LOCF) (OR = 6.59; 95% CI: 4.55 to 9.53; p < 0.00001), PASI-75 (NRI) (OR = 6.99; 95% CI: 4.43 to 11.04; p < 0.00001), sPGA response (LOCF) (OR = 5.58; 95% CI: 3.82 to 8.16; p < 0.00001), sPGA response (NRI) (OR = 6.06; 95% CI: 4.07 to 9.02; p < 0.00001), PASI-50 (LOCF) (OR = 4.37; 95% CI: 2.72 to 7.01; p < 0.00001), PASI-90 (LOCF) (OR = 7.81; 95% CI: 2.89 to 21.08; p < 0.0001), adverse events (OR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.19 to 2.10; p = 0.002), but demonstrated no increase in serious adverse events (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.43 to 2.33; p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Apremilast is effective and safe to treat psoriasis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9993210 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99932102023-03-09 Efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies Liu, Yashu Li, Yuting Du, Hanghang Postepy Dermatol Alergol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis remains controversial. AIM: We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of apremilast on treatment efficacy for psoriasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have searched PubMed, Embase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until February 2022 and assessing the efficacy and safety of apremilast for psoriasis. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with placebo for psoriasis, apremilast was associated with improved PASI-75 (LOCF) (OR = 6.59; 95% CI: 4.55 to 9.53; p < 0.00001), PASI-75 (NRI) (OR = 6.99; 95% CI: 4.43 to 11.04; p < 0.00001), sPGA response (LOCF) (OR = 5.58; 95% CI: 3.82 to 8.16; p < 0.00001), sPGA response (NRI) (OR = 6.06; 95% CI: 4.07 to 9.02; p < 0.00001), PASI-50 (LOCF) (OR = 4.37; 95% CI: 2.72 to 7.01; p < 0.00001), PASI-90 (LOCF) (OR = 7.81; 95% CI: 2.89 to 21.08; p < 0.0001), adverse events (OR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.19 to 2.10; p = 0.002), but demonstrated no increase in serious adverse events (OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 0.43 to 2.33; p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Apremilast is effective and safe to treat psoriasis. Termedia Publishing House 2022-09-06 2023-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9993210/ /pubmed/36909912 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2022.119081 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Termedia Sp. z o. o. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Liu, Yashu Li, Yuting Du, Hanghang Efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title | Efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title_full | Efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title_short | Efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
title_sort | efficacy of apremilast for psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993210/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909912 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/ada.2022.119081 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyashu efficacyofapremilastforpsoriasisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies AT liyuting efficacyofapremilastforpsoriasisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies AT duhanghang efficacyofapremilastforpsoriasisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledstudies |