Cargando…

Feasibility of a virtual reality intervention targeting distress and anxiety symptoms in patients with primary brain tumors: Interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial

PURPOSE: Cancer patients experience distress and anxiety when undergoing imaging studies to monitor disease status, yet these symptoms are not always appropriately identified or well-managed. This interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial explored feasibility and acceptability of a virtual realit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: King, Amanda L., Roche, Kayla N., Leeper, Heather E., Vera, Elizabeth, Mendoza, Tito, Mentges, Kelly, Acquaye-Mallory, Alvina A., Adegbesan, Kendra A., Boris, Lisa, Burton, Eric, Choi, Anna, Grajkowska, Ewa, Kunst, Tricia, Levine, Jason, Lollo, Nicole, Miller, Hope, Panzer, Marissa, Penas-Prado, Marta, Pillai, Valentina, Polskin, Lily, Reyes, Jennifer, Sahebjam, Solmaz, Stockdill, Macy L., Theeler, Brett J., Wu, Jing, Gilbert, Mark R., Armstrong, Terri S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36884201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04271-0
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Cancer patients experience distress and anxiety when undergoing imaging studies to monitor disease status, yet these symptoms are not always appropriately identified or well-managed. This interim analysis of a phase 2 clinical trial explored feasibility and acceptability of a virtual reality relaxation (VR) intervention for primary brain tumor (PBT) patients at the time of clinical evaluation. METHODS: English speaking, adult PBT patients with previous reports of distress and upcoming neuroimaging were recruited between March of 2021 and March 2022. A brief VR session was done within 2 weeks prior to neuroimaging with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected before and immediately post-intervention. Self-directed VR use over the next 1 month was encouraged with additional PROs assessments at 1 and 4 weeks. Feasibility metrics included enrollment, eligibility, attrition, and device-related adverse effects with satisfaction measured with qualitative phone interviews. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were approached via email, 40 (73%) responded and 20 (50%) enrolled (9 declines, 11 screen fails). 65% of participants were ≤ 50 years, 50% were male, 90% were White/non-Hispanic, 85% had good KPS (≥ 90), and most were on active treatment. All patients completed the VR intervention, PROs questionnaires, weekly check-ins, and qualitative interview. Most (90%) reported frequent VR use and high satisfaction and only 7 mild AEs were recorded (headache, dizziness, nausea, neck pain). CONCLUSION: This interim analysis supports feasibility and acceptability of a novel VR intervention to target psychological symptoms for PBT patients. Trial enrollment will continue to assess for intervention efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04301089 registered on 3/9/2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-023-04271-0.