Cargando…

Is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis?

The management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial with variable rates of avascular necrosis (AVN). Treatment options include in-situ stabilization, gentle/positional reduction and screw fixation and modified Dunn’s procedure (MDP). We present a technique of controlled rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venkatadass, K, Durga Prasad, V, Jain, Deepak, Al Ahmadi, Nasser Mohammed Mansor, Rajasekaran, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac037
_version_ 1784902531732733952
author Venkatadass, K
Durga Prasad, V
Jain, Deepak
Al Ahmadi, Nasser Mohammed Mansor
Rajasekaran, S
author_facet Venkatadass, K
Durga Prasad, V
Jain, Deepak
Al Ahmadi, Nasser Mohammed Mansor
Rajasekaran, S
author_sort Venkatadass, K
collection PubMed
description The management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial with variable rates of avascular necrosis (AVN). Treatment options include in-situ stabilization, gentle/positional reduction and screw fixation and modified Dunn’s procedure (MDP). We present a technique of controlled repositioning (CRP) of the epiphysis to pre-acute slip stage, screw fixation and primary osteoplasty. Between 2015 and 2020, 38 unstable slips were treated in our institution. Of these, 14 underwent successful CRP and the rest were treated with MDP. All the 14 patients who had CRP and completed 1-year follow-up were included for this study. The head–neck angle (HNA) was measured at presentation and alpha angle, head–neck offset and AVN were assessed during follow-up. The average age was 14 years (9–18) and mean follow-up was 17.7 months (12–43). The average intraoperative flexion internal rotation before osteoplasty was −18.5° (−40° to −5°) which improved to +22.1° (+15° to +30°). The average preoperative HNA was 48.7° (34.1° to 70.7°) which improved to 18.4° (1.8° to 35.7°) post-operatively. At final follow-up, the average alpha angle and head–neck offset were 46.4° (30.9° to 64.6°) and 0.22 (0.09 to 0.96), respectively. The AVN rate in the CRP group was 7.1% compared with 20.8% in the MDP group, which was not significant (P = 0.383). Two patients had screw breakage. CRP, screw fixation and mini-open primary osteoplasty is a feasible treatment option in a subgroup of patients with unstable SCFEs. The limitation with this technique is that the final decision is made intraoperatively, and hence the patient and parents need to be counselled and consented appropriately. Level of evidence: Level IV—Case series.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9993448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99934482023-03-09 Is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis? Venkatadass, K Durga Prasad, V Jain, Deepak Al Ahmadi, Nasser Mohammed Mansor Rajasekaran, S J Hip Preserv Surg Research Article The management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis is controversial with variable rates of avascular necrosis (AVN). Treatment options include in-situ stabilization, gentle/positional reduction and screw fixation and modified Dunn’s procedure (MDP). We present a technique of controlled repositioning (CRP) of the epiphysis to pre-acute slip stage, screw fixation and primary osteoplasty. Between 2015 and 2020, 38 unstable slips were treated in our institution. Of these, 14 underwent successful CRP and the rest were treated with MDP. All the 14 patients who had CRP and completed 1-year follow-up were included for this study. The head–neck angle (HNA) was measured at presentation and alpha angle, head–neck offset and AVN were assessed during follow-up. The average age was 14 years (9–18) and mean follow-up was 17.7 months (12–43). The average intraoperative flexion internal rotation before osteoplasty was −18.5° (−40° to −5°) which improved to +22.1° (+15° to +30°). The average preoperative HNA was 48.7° (34.1° to 70.7°) which improved to 18.4° (1.8° to 35.7°) post-operatively. At final follow-up, the average alpha angle and head–neck offset were 46.4° (30.9° to 64.6°) and 0.22 (0.09 to 0.96), respectively. The AVN rate in the CRP group was 7.1% compared with 20.8% in the MDP group, which was not significant (P = 0.383). Two patients had screw breakage. CRP, screw fixation and mini-open primary osteoplasty is a feasible treatment option in a subgroup of patients with unstable SCFEs. The limitation with this technique is that the final decision is made intraoperatively, and hence the patient and parents need to be counselled and consented appropriately. Level of evidence: Level IV—Case series. Oxford University Press 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9993448/ /pubmed/36908554 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac037 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Article
Venkatadass, K
Durga Prasad, V
Jain, Deepak
Al Ahmadi, Nasser Mohammed Mansor
Rajasekaran, S
Is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis?
title Is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis?
title_full Is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis?
title_fullStr Is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis?
title_short Is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis?
title_sort is there a role for controlled repositioning and mini-open primary osteoplasty in the management of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908554
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac037
work_keys_str_mv AT venkatadassk istherearoleforcontrolledrepositioningandminiopenprimaryosteoplastyinthemanagementofunstableslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis
AT durgaprasadv istherearoleforcontrolledrepositioningandminiopenprimaryosteoplastyinthemanagementofunstableslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis
AT jaindeepak istherearoleforcontrolledrepositioningandminiopenprimaryosteoplastyinthemanagementofunstableslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis
AT alahmadinassermohammedmansor istherearoleforcontrolledrepositioningandminiopenprimaryosteoplastyinthemanagementofunstableslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis
AT rajasekarans istherearoleforcontrolledrepositioningandminiopenprimaryosteoplastyinthemanagementofunstableslippedcapitalfemoralepiphysis