Cargando…
Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach
To decrease hip abductor dysfunction after periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral/trochanteric approach, we aimed to modify transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA) to not cut the greater trochanter and abductor–iliac crest detachment. We subsequently compared abductor muscle strength recov...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac047 |
_version_ | 1784902531977052160 |
---|---|
author | Nakashima, Yasuharu Hara, Daisuke Ohishi, Masanobu Motomura, Goro Kawano, Ichiro Hamai, Satoshi Kawahara, Shinya Sato, Taishi Yamaguchi, Ryosuke Utsunomiya, Takeshi Kitamura, Kenji |
author_facet | Nakashima, Yasuharu Hara, Daisuke Ohishi, Masanobu Motomura, Goro Kawano, Ichiro Hamai, Satoshi Kawahara, Shinya Sato, Taishi Yamaguchi, Ryosuke Utsunomiya, Takeshi Kitamura, Kenji |
author_sort | Nakashima, Yasuharu |
collection | PubMed |
description | To decrease hip abductor dysfunction after periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral/trochanteric approach, we aimed to modify transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA) to not cut the greater trochanter and abductor–iliac crest detachment. We subsequently compared abductor muscle strength recovery between TOAs with [conventional TOA (C-TOA)] and without [modified TOA (M-TOA)] trochanteric osteotomy. C-TOA and M-TOA were performed in 27 and 34 hips, respectively. Hip abduction, flexion and knee extension muscle strength were measured preoperatively and at 3, 5, 10, 24 and 52 weeks postoperatively. The muscle strength ratio of the affected and contralateral lower limbs was compared between the C-TOA and M-TOA groups. Neither the mean Merle d’Aubigné–Postel score at the final follow-up nor the postoperative center-edge angle showed significant differences between the M-TOA and C-TOA groups (15.7 versus 16.4 points; P = 0.25 and 38.5° versus P = 0.62 and 39.8°, respectively). The mean muscle strength ratios of hip abduction at 5, 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively were significantly higher in the M-TOA group than in the C-TOA group (0.62 versus 0.39, 0.76 versus 0.59 and 0.94 versus 0.70; P = 0.03, 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups at Postoperative Week 52 (P = 0.36). Discomfort at the greater trochanter was observed in 18 hips (66.7%) in the C-TOA group but only in 4 hips (11.2%) in the M-TOA group. In conclusion, M-TOA is less invasive than C-TOA and allows an earlier recovery of abductor muscle strength without significant correction loss. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9993449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99934492023-03-09 Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach Nakashima, Yasuharu Hara, Daisuke Ohishi, Masanobu Motomura, Goro Kawano, Ichiro Hamai, Satoshi Kawahara, Shinya Sato, Taishi Yamaguchi, Ryosuke Utsunomiya, Takeshi Kitamura, Kenji J Hip Preserv Surg Research Article To decrease hip abductor dysfunction after periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral/trochanteric approach, we aimed to modify transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA) to not cut the greater trochanter and abductor–iliac crest detachment. We subsequently compared abductor muscle strength recovery between TOAs with [conventional TOA (C-TOA)] and without [modified TOA (M-TOA)] trochanteric osteotomy. C-TOA and M-TOA were performed in 27 and 34 hips, respectively. Hip abduction, flexion and knee extension muscle strength were measured preoperatively and at 3, 5, 10, 24 and 52 weeks postoperatively. The muscle strength ratio of the affected and contralateral lower limbs was compared between the C-TOA and M-TOA groups. Neither the mean Merle d’Aubigné–Postel score at the final follow-up nor the postoperative center-edge angle showed significant differences between the M-TOA and C-TOA groups (15.7 versus 16.4 points; P = 0.25 and 38.5° versus P = 0.62 and 39.8°, respectively). The mean muscle strength ratios of hip abduction at 5, 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively were significantly higher in the M-TOA group than in the C-TOA group (0.62 versus 0.39, 0.76 versus 0.59 and 0.94 versus 0.70; P = 0.03, 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups at Postoperative Week 52 (P = 0.36). Discomfort at the greater trochanter was observed in 18 hips (66.7%) in the C-TOA group but only in 4 hips (11.2%) in the M-TOA group. In conclusion, M-TOA is less invasive than C-TOA and allows an earlier recovery of abductor muscle strength without significant correction loss. Oxford University Press 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9993449/ /pubmed/36908558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac047 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nakashima, Yasuharu Hara, Daisuke Ohishi, Masanobu Motomura, Goro Kawano, Ichiro Hamai, Satoshi Kawahara, Shinya Sato, Taishi Yamaguchi, Ryosuke Utsunomiya, Takeshi Kitamura, Kenji Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach |
title | Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach |
title_full | Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach |
title_fullStr | Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach |
title_short | Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach |
title_sort | abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakashimayasuharu abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach AT haradaisuke abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach AT ohishimasanobu abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach AT motomuragoro abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach AT kawanoichiro abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach AT hamaisatoshi abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach AT kawaharashinya abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach AT satotaishi abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach AT yamaguchiryosuke abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach AT utsunomiyatakeshi abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach AT kitamurakenji abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach |