Cargando…

Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach

To decrease hip abductor dysfunction after periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral/trochanteric approach, we aimed to modify transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA) to not cut the greater trochanter and abductor–iliac crest detachment. We subsequently compared abductor muscle strength recov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakashima, Yasuharu, Hara, Daisuke, Ohishi, Masanobu, Motomura, Goro, Kawano, Ichiro, Hamai, Satoshi, Kawahara, Shinya, Sato, Taishi, Yamaguchi, Ryosuke, Utsunomiya, Takeshi, Kitamura, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac047
_version_ 1784902531977052160
author Nakashima, Yasuharu
Hara, Daisuke
Ohishi, Masanobu
Motomura, Goro
Kawano, Ichiro
Hamai, Satoshi
Kawahara, Shinya
Sato, Taishi
Yamaguchi, Ryosuke
Utsunomiya, Takeshi
Kitamura, Kenji
author_facet Nakashima, Yasuharu
Hara, Daisuke
Ohishi, Masanobu
Motomura, Goro
Kawano, Ichiro
Hamai, Satoshi
Kawahara, Shinya
Sato, Taishi
Yamaguchi, Ryosuke
Utsunomiya, Takeshi
Kitamura, Kenji
author_sort Nakashima, Yasuharu
collection PubMed
description To decrease hip abductor dysfunction after periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral/trochanteric approach, we aimed to modify transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA) to not cut the greater trochanter and abductor–iliac crest detachment. We subsequently compared abductor muscle strength recovery between TOAs with [conventional TOA (C-TOA)] and without [modified TOA (M-TOA)] trochanteric osteotomy. C-TOA and M-TOA were performed in 27 and 34 hips, respectively. Hip abduction, flexion and knee extension muscle strength were measured preoperatively and at 3, 5, 10, 24 and 52 weeks postoperatively. The muscle strength ratio of the affected and contralateral lower limbs was compared between the C-TOA and M-TOA groups. Neither the mean Merle d’Aubigné–Postel score at the final follow-up nor the postoperative center-edge angle showed significant differences between the M-TOA and C-TOA groups (15.7 versus 16.4 points; P = 0.25 and 38.5° versus P = 0.62 and 39.8°, respectively). The mean muscle strength ratios of hip abduction at 5, 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively were significantly higher in the M-TOA group than in the C-TOA group (0.62 versus 0.39, 0.76 versus 0.59 and 0.94 versus 0.70; P = 0.03, 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups at Postoperative Week 52 (P = 0.36). Discomfort at the greater trochanter was observed in 18 hips (66.7%) in the C-TOA group but only in 4 hips (11.2%) in the M-TOA group. In conclusion, M-TOA is less invasive than C-TOA and allows an earlier recovery of abductor muscle strength without significant correction loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9993449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99934492023-03-09 Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach Nakashima, Yasuharu Hara, Daisuke Ohishi, Masanobu Motomura, Goro Kawano, Ichiro Hamai, Satoshi Kawahara, Shinya Sato, Taishi Yamaguchi, Ryosuke Utsunomiya, Takeshi Kitamura, Kenji J Hip Preserv Surg Research Article To decrease hip abductor dysfunction after periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral/trochanteric approach, we aimed to modify transposition osteotomy of the acetabulum (TOA) to not cut the greater trochanter and abductor–iliac crest detachment. We subsequently compared abductor muscle strength recovery between TOAs with [conventional TOA (C-TOA)] and without [modified TOA (M-TOA)] trochanteric osteotomy. C-TOA and M-TOA were performed in 27 and 34 hips, respectively. Hip abduction, flexion and knee extension muscle strength were measured preoperatively and at 3, 5, 10, 24 and 52 weeks postoperatively. The muscle strength ratio of the affected and contralateral lower limbs was compared between the C-TOA and M-TOA groups. Neither the mean Merle d’Aubigné–Postel score at the final follow-up nor the postoperative center-edge angle showed significant differences between the M-TOA and C-TOA groups (15.7 versus 16.4 points; P = 0.25 and 38.5° versus P = 0.62 and 39.8°, respectively). The mean muscle strength ratios of hip abduction at 5, 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively were significantly higher in the M-TOA group than in the C-TOA group (0.62 versus 0.39, 0.76 versus 0.59 and 0.94 versus 0.70; P = 0.03, 0.04 and 0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups at Postoperative Week 52 (P = 0.36). Discomfort at the greater trochanter was observed in 18 hips (66.7%) in the C-TOA group but only in 4 hips (11.2%) in the M-TOA group. In conclusion, M-TOA is less invasive than C-TOA and allows an earlier recovery of abductor muscle strength without significant correction loss. Oxford University Press 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9993449/ /pubmed/36908558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac047 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Article
Nakashima, Yasuharu
Hara, Daisuke
Ohishi, Masanobu
Motomura, Goro
Kawano, Ichiro
Hamai, Satoshi
Kawahara, Shinya
Sato, Taishi
Yamaguchi, Ryosuke
Utsunomiya, Takeshi
Kitamura, Kenji
Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach
title Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach
title_full Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach
title_fullStr Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach
title_full_unstemmed Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach
title_short Abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach
title_sort abductor recovery after muscle-sparing periacetabular osteotomy using a lateral approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac047
work_keys_str_mv AT nakashimayasuharu abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach
AT haradaisuke abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach
AT ohishimasanobu abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach
AT motomuragoro abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach
AT kawanoichiro abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach
AT hamaisatoshi abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach
AT kawaharashinya abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach
AT satotaishi abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach
AT yamaguchiryosuke abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach
AT utsunomiyatakeshi abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach
AT kitamurakenji abductorrecoveryaftermusclesparingperiacetabularosteotomyusingalateralapproach