Cargando…

Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint

Computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for femoral version measurement. However, recent data have shown magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as another modality to measure femoral version. This study aimed to correlate MRI and CT femoral version measurements in patients presenting with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goldsmith, Campbell, Cheng, Jennifer, Mintz, Douglas, Moley, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac036
_version_ 1784902532921819136
author Goldsmith, Campbell
Cheng, Jennifer
Mintz, Douglas
Moley, Peter
author_facet Goldsmith, Campbell
Cheng, Jennifer
Mintz, Douglas
Moley, Peter
author_sort Goldsmith, Campbell
collection PubMed
description Computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for femoral version measurement. However, recent data have shown magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as another modality to measure femoral version. This study aimed to correlate MRI and CT femoral version measurements in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)-related complaint. Patients (18–35 years old) who presented to the hip preservation clinic and radiology department with a suspected FAI diagnosis from 26 December 2018 to 4 March 2020 were included. All patients had a CT and MRI of the hip, with images including both hips and knees, as per our institution’s protocol for possible hip preservation surgery. Patients were excluded if they were missing views of the knees, or if they had a history or imaging appearance of any condition affecting femoral version at the femoral head (e.g. slipped capital femoral epiphysis). Femoral version was measured by three reviewers. Fifty-eight patients were included, and 36 (62%) were female. Femoral version averaged 6.1° ± 11.8° on CT and 6.5° ± 10.8° on MRI. A strong positive correlation was reported between the two imaging modalities (r: 0.81; P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability among the three reviewers was excellent and statistically significant for measurements on both MRI [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.95; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.99; P < 0.001] and CT (ICC: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.92, 0.99; P < 0.001). Our finding suggests that MRI is a sufficient method for measuring femoral version to determine disease etiology and treatment progression. To avoid exposing patients to ionizing radiation, physicians should not obtain CT scans to evaluate femoral version.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9993453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99934532023-03-09 Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint Goldsmith, Campbell Cheng, Jennifer Mintz, Douglas Moley, Peter J Hip Preserv Surg Research Article Computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for femoral version measurement. However, recent data have shown magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as another modality to measure femoral version. This study aimed to correlate MRI and CT femoral version measurements in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)-related complaint. Patients (18–35 years old) who presented to the hip preservation clinic and radiology department with a suspected FAI diagnosis from 26 December 2018 to 4 March 2020 were included. All patients had a CT and MRI of the hip, with images including both hips and knees, as per our institution’s protocol for possible hip preservation surgery. Patients were excluded if they were missing views of the knees, or if they had a history or imaging appearance of any condition affecting femoral version at the femoral head (e.g. slipped capital femoral epiphysis). Femoral version was measured by three reviewers. Fifty-eight patients were included, and 36 (62%) were female. Femoral version averaged 6.1° ± 11.8° on CT and 6.5° ± 10.8° on MRI. A strong positive correlation was reported between the two imaging modalities (r: 0.81; P < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability among the three reviewers was excellent and statistically significant for measurements on both MRI [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.95; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.99; P < 0.001] and CT (ICC: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.92, 0.99; P < 0.001). Our finding suggests that MRI is a sufficient method for measuring femoral version to determine disease etiology and treatment progression. To avoid exposing patients to ionizing radiation, physicians should not obtain CT scans to evaluate femoral version. Oxford University Press 2022-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9993453/ /pubmed/36908551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac036 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research Article
Goldsmith, Campbell
Cheng, Jennifer
Mintz, Douglas
Moley, Peter
Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint
title Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint
title_full Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint
title_fullStr Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint
title_full_unstemmed Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint
title_short Correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint
title_sort correlation of femoral version measurements between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging studies in patients presenting with a femoroacetabular impingement-related complaint
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnac036
work_keys_str_mv AT goldsmithcampbell correlationoffemoralversionmeasurementsbetweencomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingstudiesinpatientspresentingwithafemoroacetabularimpingementrelatedcomplaint
AT chengjennifer correlationoffemoralversionmeasurementsbetweencomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingstudiesinpatientspresentingwithafemoroacetabularimpingementrelatedcomplaint
AT mintzdouglas correlationoffemoralversionmeasurementsbetweencomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingstudiesinpatientspresentingwithafemoroacetabularimpingementrelatedcomplaint
AT moleypeter correlationoffemoralversionmeasurementsbetweencomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceimagingstudiesinpatientspresentingwithafemoroacetabularimpingementrelatedcomplaint