Cargando…

Left ventricular ejection fraction using a simplified wall motion score based on mid-parasternal short axis and apical four-chamber views for non-cardiologists

BACKGROUND: There is a need for a convenient, yet reliable method to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with point-of-care ultrasound study (POCUS). We aim to validate a novel and simplified wall motion score LVEF based on the analysis of a simplified combination of echocardiographic v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lebeau, Réal, Robert-Halabi, Maxime, Pichette, Maxime, Vinet, Alain, Sauvé, Claude, Dilorenzo, Maria, Le, Viet, Piette, Eric, Brunet, Mathieu, Bédard, William, Serri, Karim, Poulin, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36890433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03141-x
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There is a need for a convenient, yet reliable method to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with point-of-care ultrasound study (POCUS). We aim to validate a novel and simplified wall motion score LVEF based on the analysis of a simplified combination of echocardiographic views. METHODS: In this retrospective study, transthoracic echocardiograms of randomly selected patients were analysed by the standard 16-segments wall motion score index (WMSI) to derive the reference semi-quantitative LVEF. To develop our semi-quantitative simplified-views method, a limited combination of imaging views and only 4 segments per view were tested: (1) A combination of the three parasternal short-axis views (PSAX BASE, MID-, APEX); (2) A combination of the three apical views (apical 2-chamber, 3-chamber and 4-chamber) and (3) A more limited combination of PSAX-MID and apical 4-chamber is called the MID-4CH. Global LVEF is obtained by averaging segmental EF based on contractility (normal = 60%, hypokinesia = 40%, and akinesia = 10%). Accuracy of the novel semi-quantitative simplified-views WMS method compared to the reference WMSI was evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis and correlation was assessed in both emergency physicians and cardiologists. RESULTS: In the 46 patients using the 16 segments WMSI method, the mean LVEF was 34 ± 10%. Among the three combinations of the two or three imaging views analysed, the MID-4CH had the best correlation with the reference method (r(2) = 0.90) with very good agreement (mean LVEF bias = − 0.2%) and precision (± 3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac POCUS by emergency physicians and other non-cardiologists is a decisive therapeutic and prognostic tool. A simplified semi-quantitative WMS method to assess LVEF using the easiest technically achievable combination of mid-parasternal and apical four-chamber views provides a good approximative estimate for both non-cardiologist emergency physicians and cardiologists. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03141-x.