Cargando…

Effect of C-reactive protein on the risk of Heart failure: a mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND: Traditional observational studies have shown positive associations between c-reactive protein (CRP) and heart failure (HF) risk. However, this association has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, Mendelian randomization was used to examine CRP’s possible etiological roles with HF. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habibi, Danial, Daneshpour, Maryam S, Asgarian, Sara, Kohansal, Karim, Hadaegh, Farzad, Mansourian, Marjan, Akbarzadeh, Mahdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9993577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36882679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03149-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Traditional observational studies have shown positive associations between c-reactive protein (CRP) and heart failure (HF) risk. However, this association has not been fully elucidated. Therefore, Mendelian randomization was used to examine CRP’s possible etiological roles with HF. METHODS: We implemented a two-sample Mendelian randomization framework to examine the causality of the association between CRP and HF based on summary statistics by large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets of European ancestry through inverse-variance weighted, weighted median, MREgger regression, and MR-PRESSO methods. The summary statistics dataset on the association of genetic variants with CRP was used from the published GWAS of European descent in UK Biobank participants (N = 427,367) and the CHARGE consortium (N = 575,531). The GWAS dataset used to identify genetic variants underlying HF from the HERMES consortium includes 977,323 participants (47,309 cases and 930,014 controls). The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was employed to examine this association. RESULTS: The results of our IVW indicated that CRP was strongly associated with HF (OR = 4.18, 95% CI = 3.40–5.13, p < 0.001). The Cochran heterogeneity test showed significant heterogeneity among SNPs of CRP (Q = 317.55, p < 0.001; I(2) = 37.6%), and no considerable pleiotropy was detected for the association of CRP with HF [intercept = 0.003; p = 0.234]. This finding remained consistent using different Mendelian randomization methods and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Our MR study did identify convincing evidence to support CRP associated with HF risk. Human genetic data suggest that CRP is a causative factor in HF. Hence, CRP assessment may offer additional prognostic information as an adjuvant to overall risk assessment in HF patients. These findings prompt significant questions about the function of inflammation in the progression of HF. More research into the role of inflammation in HF is needed to guide trials of anti-inflammation management. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-023-03149-3.