Cargando…

Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship

Evaluating sustainability stewardship at higher educational institutions is essential to working towards improving our environment. Many institutions have used environmental footprint indicators as a way to evaluate, track, and improve their impact on the environment. In this article, we present the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dukes, Elizabeth, Cheng, Selina, Mogen, Samuel, Galloway, James, Leach, Allison, Trimble, Andrea Ruedy, Pettit, Andrew, Compton, Jana, Pennino, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/scc.2022.0067
_version_ 1784902632123400192
author Dukes, Elizabeth
Cheng, Selina
Mogen, Samuel
Galloway, James
Leach, Allison
Trimble, Andrea Ruedy
Pettit, Andrew
Compton, Jana
Pennino, Michael
author_facet Dukes, Elizabeth
Cheng, Selina
Mogen, Samuel
Galloway, James
Leach, Allison
Trimble, Andrea Ruedy
Pettit, Andrew
Compton, Jana
Pennino, Michael
author_sort Dukes, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Evaluating sustainability stewardship at higher educational institutions is essential to working towards improving our environment. Many institutions have used environmental footprint indicators as a way to evaluate, track, and improve their impact on the environment. In this article, we present the web-based Integrated Environmental Footprint Tool (IEFT), which allows users to test how changes in certain activities impact nitrogen (N), greenhouse gases (GHG), phosphorus (P), and water (W) footprints for a university campus. This study uses the University of Virginia (UVA) as a model to show the impacts of their existing sustainability plans on multiple footprint indicators. Strategies from the University of Virginia's (UVA) two exisiting action plans, the GHG Action Plan and the N Action Plan, are evaluated to determine their impact on each of the footprints (GHG, N, P, and W). Based on the 2025 goal year, the strategies in these action plans are estimated to reduce the GHG, N, P, and W footprints by −38%, 32%, 25%, and 2.7% respectively. The damage costs associated with GHG and N footprints are assessed and reveal a 38 percent reduction in damage costs for GHG and a 42 percent reduction in costs for N. Using the IEFT to evaluate the impact of these action plan strategies, UVA optimized environmental outcomes. The model shown here can be used at other institutions to evaluate the environmental impact of planned changes to an institutions' operations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9994435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99944352023-03-09 Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship Dukes, Elizabeth Cheng, Selina Mogen, Samuel Galloway, James Leach, Allison Trimble, Andrea Ruedy Pettit, Andrew Compton, Jana Pennino, Michael Sustain Clim Chang Original Articles Evaluating sustainability stewardship at higher educational institutions is essential to working towards improving our environment. Many institutions have used environmental footprint indicators as a way to evaluate, track, and improve their impact on the environment. In this article, we present the web-based Integrated Environmental Footprint Tool (IEFT), which allows users to test how changes in certain activities impact nitrogen (N), greenhouse gases (GHG), phosphorus (P), and water (W) footprints for a university campus. This study uses the University of Virginia (UVA) as a model to show the impacts of their existing sustainability plans on multiple footprint indicators. Strategies from the University of Virginia's (UVA) two exisiting action plans, the GHG Action Plan and the N Action Plan, are evaluated to determine their impact on each of the footprints (GHG, N, P, and W). Based on the 2025 goal year, the strategies in these action plans are estimated to reduce the GHG, N, P, and W footprints by −38%, 32%, 25%, and 2.7% respectively. The damage costs associated with GHG and N footprints are assessed and reveal a 38 percent reduction in damage costs for GHG and a 42 percent reduction in costs for N. Using the IEFT to evaluate the impact of these action plan strategies, UVA optimized environmental outcomes. The model shown here can be used at other institutions to evaluate the environmental impact of planned changes to an institutions' operations. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023-02-01 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9994435/ /pubmed/36910689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/scc.2022.0067 Text en © Elizabeth Dukes et al., 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (CC-BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dukes, Elizabeth
Cheng, Selina
Mogen, Samuel
Galloway, James
Leach, Allison
Trimble, Andrea Ruedy
Pettit, Andrew
Compton, Jana
Pennino, Michael
Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship
title Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship
title_full Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship
title_fullStr Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship
title_full_unstemmed Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship
title_short Footprints in Action: How UVA Is Managing Its Sustainability Stewardship
title_sort footprints in action: how uva is managing its sustainability stewardship
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/scc.2022.0067
work_keys_str_mv AT dukeselizabeth footprintsinactionhowuvaismanagingitssustainabilitystewardship
AT chengselina footprintsinactionhowuvaismanagingitssustainabilitystewardship
AT mogensamuel footprintsinactionhowuvaismanagingitssustainabilitystewardship
AT gallowayjames footprintsinactionhowuvaismanagingitssustainabilitystewardship
AT leachallison footprintsinactionhowuvaismanagingitssustainabilitystewardship
AT trimbleandrearuedy footprintsinactionhowuvaismanagingitssustainabilitystewardship
AT pettitandrew footprintsinactionhowuvaismanagingitssustainabilitystewardship
AT comptonjana footprintsinactionhowuvaismanagingitssustainabilitystewardship
AT penninomichael footprintsinactionhowuvaismanagingitssustainabilitystewardship