Cargando…

Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer, Bio-C® Sealer, with other calcium silicate-based sealers: BioRoot™ RCS, one silicon-based sealer combined with calcium silicate particles: GuttaFlow® Bioseal, one resin MTA-based root canal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tolosa-Monfà, Alba, Veroni, Alma, Blasi-Cabús, Juan, Ballester-Palacios, Maria-Lluisa, Berástegui-Jimeno, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911158
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59868
_version_ 1784902659314024448
author Tolosa-Monfà, Alba
Veroni, Alma
Blasi-Cabús, Juan
Ballester-Palacios, Maria-Lluisa
Berástegui-Jimeno, Esther
author_facet Tolosa-Monfà, Alba
Veroni, Alma
Blasi-Cabús, Juan
Ballester-Palacios, Maria-Lluisa
Berástegui-Jimeno, Esther
author_sort Tolosa-Monfà, Alba
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer, Bio-C® Sealer, with other calcium silicate-based sealers: BioRoot™ RCS, one silicon-based sealer combined with calcium silicate particles: GuttaFlow® Bioseal, one resin MTA-based root canal sealer: MTA Fillapex®, and an epoxy resin-based sealer: AH Plus®. MATERIAL AND METHODS: NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were cultured and sealers extracts were obtained. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by the MTS assay and the optical densities of the solutions were measured with a microplate reader. This study was designed with one sample for each control group and n=10 for each treatment group of the different sealants. The results were classified according to the degree of cell viability and underwent statistical analysis with the ANOVA test (p<0.05). The samples were examined under an inverted microscope to evaluate the effect of each sealer on fibroblast cell morphology. RESULTS: Cells incubated with GuttaFlow® Bioseal extract showed the highest cell viability without statistically significant differences with the control group. BioRoot™ RCS and Bio-C® Sealer showed moderate (tending to slight) cytotoxicity and both AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® showed severe cytotoxicity in comparison with the control group (p<0.05). AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® were not significantly different from one another; nor was BioRoot™ RCS from Bio-C® Sealer. Microscope examination found that fibroblasts in contact with GuttaFlow® Bioseal and Bio-C® Sealer presented the most similar aspects to the control group both in terms of number and shape. CONCLUSIONS: Bio-C® Sealer showed moderate (tending to slight) cytotoxicity compared with the control group, GuttaFlow® Bioseal showed no cytotoxicity, BioRoot™ RCS moderate-slight cytotoxicity and AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® severe cytotoxicity. Key words:Biocompatibility, calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers, cytotoxicity, endodontic sealer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9994654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99946542023-03-09 Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers Tolosa-Monfà, Alba Veroni, Alma Blasi-Cabús, Juan Ballester-Palacios, Maria-Lluisa Berástegui-Jimeno, Esther J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer, Bio-C® Sealer, with other calcium silicate-based sealers: BioRoot™ RCS, one silicon-based sealer combined with calcium silicate particles: GuttaFlow® Bioseal, one resin MTA-based root canal sealer: MTA Fillapex®, and an epoxy resin-based sealer: AH Plus®. MATERIAL AND METHODS: NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were cultured and sealers extracts were obtained. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by the MTS assay and the optical densities of the solutions were measured with a microplate reader. This study was designed with one sample for each control group and n=10 for each treatment group of the different sealants. The results were classified according to the degree of cell viability and underwent statistical analysis with the ANOVA test (p<0.05). The samples were examined under an inverted microscope to evaluate the effect of each sealer on fibroblast cell morphology. RESULTS: Cells incubated with GuttaFlow® Bioseal extract showed the highest cell viability without statistically significant differences with the control group. BioRoot™ RCS and Bio-C® Sealer showed moderate (tending to slight) cytotoxicity and both AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® showed severe cytotoxicity in comparison with the control group (p<0.05). AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® were not significantly different from one another; nor was BioRoot™ RCS from Bio-C® Sealer. Microscope examination found that fibroblasts in contact with GuttaFlow® Bioseal and Bio-C® Sealer presented the most similar aspects to the control group both in terms of number and shape. CONCLUSIONS: Bio-C® Sealer showed moderate (tending to slight) cytotoxicity compared with the control group, GuttaFlow® Bioseal showed no cytotoxicity, BioRoot™ RCS moderate-slight cytotoxicity and AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® severe cytotoxicity. Key words:Biocompatibility, calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers, cytotoxicity, endodontic sealer. Medicina Oral S.L. 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9994654/ /pubmed/36911158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59868 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Tolosa-Monfà, Alba
Veroni, Alma
Blasi-Cabús, Juan
Ballester-Palacios, Maria-Lluisa
Berástegui-Jimeno, Esther
Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers
title Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers
title_full Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers
title_fullStr Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers
title_full_unstemmed Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers
title_short Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers
title_sort cytotoxicity comparison of bio c sealer against multiple root canal sealers
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911158
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59868
work_keys_str_mv AT tolosamonfaalba cytotoxicitycomparisonofbiocsealeragainstmultiplerootcanalsealers
AT veronialma cytotoxicitycomparisonofbiocsealeragainstmultiplerootcanalsealers
AT blasicabusjuan cytotoxicitycomparisonofbiocsealeragainstmultiplerootcanalsealers
AT ballesterpalaciosmarialluisa cytotoxicitycomparisonofbiocsealeragainstmultiplerootcanalsealers
AT berasteguijimenoesther cytotoxicitycomparisonofbiocsealeragainstmultiplerootcanalsealers