Cargando…
Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer, Bio-C® Sealer, with other calcium silicate-based sealers: BioRoot™ RCS, one silicon-based sealer combined with calcium silicate particles: GuttaFlow® Bioseal, one resin MTA-based root canal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59868 |
_version_ | 1784902659314024448 |
---|---|
author | Tolosa-Monfà, Alba Veroni, Alma Blasi-Cabús, Juan Ballester-Palacios, Maria-Lluisa Berástegui-Jimeno, Esther |
author_facet | Tolosa-Monfà, Alba Veroni, Alma Blasi-Cabús, Juan Ballester-Palacios, Maria-Lluisa Berástegui-Jimeno, Esther |
author_sort | Tolosa-Monfà, Alba |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer, Bio-C® Sealer, with other calcium silicate-based sealers: BioRoot™ RCS, one silicon-based sealer combined with calcium silicate particles: GuttaFlow® Bioseal, one resin MTA-based root canal sealer: MTA Fillapex®, and an epoxy resin-based sealer: AH Plus®. MATERIAL AND METHODS: NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were cultured and sealers extracts were obtained. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by the MTS assay and the optical densities of the solutions were measured with a microplate reader. This study was designed with one sample for each control group and n=10 for each treatment group of the different sealants. The results were classified according to the degree of cell viability and underwent statistical analysis with the ANOVA test (p<0.05). The samples were examined under an inverted microscope to evaluate the effect of each sealer on fibroblast cell morphology. RESULTS: Cells incubated with GuttaFlow® Bioseal extract showed the highest cell viability without statistically significant differences with the control group. BioRoot™ RCS and Bio-C® Sealer showed moderate (tending to slight) cytotoxicity and both AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® showed severe cytotoxicity in comparison with the control group (p<0.05). AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® were not significantly different from one another; nor was BioRoot™ RCS from Bio-C® Sealer. Microscope examination found that fibroblasts in contact with GuttaFlow® Bioseal and Bio-C® Sealer presented the most similar aspects to the control group both in terms of number and shape. CONCLUSIONS: Bio-C® Sealer showed moderate (tending to slight) cytotoxicity compared with the control group, GuttaFlow® Bioseal showed no cytotoxicity, BioRoot™ RCS moderate-slight cytotoxicity and AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® severe cytotoxicity. Key words:Biocompatibility, calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers, cytotoxicity, endodontic sealer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9994654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Medicina Oral S.L. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99946542023-03-09 Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers Tolosa-Monfà, Alba Veroni, Alma Blasi-Cabús, Juan Ballester-Palacios, Maria-Lluisa Berástegui-Jimeno, Esther J Clin Exp Dent Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer, Bio-C® Sealer, with other calcium silicate-based sealers: BioRoot™ RCS, one silicon-based sealer combined with calcium silicate particles: GuttaFlow® Bioseal, one resin MTA-based root canal sealer: MTA Fillapex®, and an epoxy resin-based sealer: AH Plus®. MATERIAL AND METHODS: NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were cultured and sealers extracts were obtained. Cytotoxicity was evaluated by the MTS assay and the optical densities of the solutions were measured with a microplate reader. This study was designed with one sample for each control group and n=10 for each treatment group of the different sealants. The results were classified according to the degree of cell viability and underwent statistical analysis with the ANOVA test (p<0.05). The samples were examined under an inverted microscope to evaluate the effect of each sealer on fibroblast cell morphology. RESULTS: Cells incubated with GuttaFlow® Bioseal extract showed the highest cell viability without statistically significant differences with the control group. BioRoot™ RCS and Bio-C® Sealer showed moderate (tending to slight) cytotoxicity and both AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® showed severe cytotoxicity in comparison with the control group (p<0.05). AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® were not significantly different from one another; nor was BioRoot™ RCS from Bio-C® Sealer. Microscope examination found that fibroblasts in contact with GuttaFlow® Bioseal and Bio-C® Sealer presented the most similar aspects to the control group both in terms of number and shape. CONCLUSIONS: Bio-C® Sealer showed moderate (tending to slight) cytotoxicity compared with the control group, GuttaFlow® Bioseal showed no cytotoxicity, BioRoot™ RCS moderate-slight cytotoxicity and AH Plus® and MTA Fillapex® severe cytotoxicity. Key words:Biocompatibility, calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers, cytotoxicity, endodontic sealer. Medicina Oral S.L. 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9994654/ /pubmed/36911158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59868 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Medicina Oral S.L. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Tolosa-Monfà, Alba Veroni, Alma Blasi-Cabús, Juan Ballester-Palacios, Maria-Lluisa Berástegui-Jimeno, Esther Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers |
title | Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers |
title_full | Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers |
title_fullStr | Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers |
title_full_unstemmed | Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers |
title_short | Cytotoxicity comparison of Bio C Sealer against multiple root canal sealers |
title_sort | cytotoxicity comparison of bio c sealer against multiple root canal sealers |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911158 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.59868 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tolosamonfaalba cytotoxicitycomparisonofbiocsealeragainstmultiplerootcanalsealers AT veronialma cytotoxicitycomparisonofbiocsealeragainstmultiplerootcanalsealers AT blasicabusjuan cytotoxicitycomparisonofbiocsealeragainstmultiplerootcanalsealers AT ballesterpalaciosmarialluisa cytotoxicitycomparisonofbiocsealeragainstmultiplerootcanalsealers AT berasteguijimenoesther cytotoxicitycomparisonofbiocsealeragainstmultiplerootcanalsealers |