Cargando…
Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT)
BACKGROUND: Gait disorders and cognitive impairments are prime causes of disability and institutionalization after stroke. We hypothesized that relative to single-task gait rehabilitation (ST GR), cognitive-motor dual-task (DT) GR initiated at the subacute stage would be associated with greater impr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36890548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07138-x |
_version_ | 1784902692403937280 |
---|---|
author | Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie Roussel, Martine Toba, Monica N. Sader, Thibaud Barbier, Vincent Delafontaine, Arnaud Meynier, Jonathan Picard, Carl Constans, Jean-Marc Schnitzler, Alexis Godefroy, Olivier Yelnik, Alain Pierre |
author_facet | Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie Roussel, Martine Toba, Monica N. Sader, Thibaud Barbier, Vincent Delafontaine, Arnaud Meynier, Jonathan Picard, Carl Constans, Jean-Marc Schnitzler, Alexis Godefroy, Olivier Yelnik, Alain Pierre |
author_sort | Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gait disorders and cognitive impairments are prime causes of disability and institutionalization after stroke. We hypothesized that relative to single-task gait rehabilitation (ST GR), cognitive-motor dual-task (DT) GR initiated at the subacute stage would be associated with greater improvements in ST and DT gait, balance, and cognitive performance, personal autonomy, disability, and quality of life in the short, medium and long terms after stroke. METHODS: This multicenter (n=12), two-arm, parallel-group, randomized (1:1), controlled clinical study is a superiority trial. With p<0.05, a power of 80%, and an expected loss to follow-up rate of 10%, the inclusion of 300 patients will be required to evidence a 0.1-m.s(−1) gain in gait speed. Trial will include adult patients (18–90 years) in the subacute phase (0 to 6 months after a hemispheric stroke) and who are able to walk for 10 m (with or without a technical aid). Registered physiotherapists will deliver a standardized GR program (30 min three times a week, for 4 weeks). The GR program will comprise various DTs (phasic, executive function, praxis, memory, and spatial cognition tasks during gait) in the DT (experimental) group and gait exercises only in the ST (control) group. The primary outcome measure is gait speed 6 months after inclusion. The secondary outcomes are post-stroke impairments (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and the motor part of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the lower extremity), gait speed (10-m walking test), mobility and dynamic balance (timed up-and-go test), ST and DT cognitive function (the French adaptation of the harmonization standards neuropsychological battery, and eight cognitive-motor DTs), personal autonomy (functional independence measure), restrictions in participation (structured interview and the modified Rankin score), and health-related quality of life (on a visual analog scale). These variables will be assessed immediately after the end of the protocol (probing the short-term effect), 1 month thereafter (the medium-term effect), and 5 months thereafter (the long-term effect). DISCUSSION: The main study limitation is the open design. The trial will focus on a new GR program applicable at various stages after stroke and during neurological disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03009773. Registered on January 4, 2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07138-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9994785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99947852023-03-09 Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT) Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie Roussel, Martine Toba, Monica N. Sader, Thibaud Barbier, Vincent Delafontaine, Arnaud Meynier, Jonathan Picard, Carl Constans, Jean-Marc Schnitzler, Alexis Godefroy, Olivier Yelnik, Alain Pierre Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Gait disorders and cognitive impairments are prime causes of disability and institutionalization after stroke. We hypothesized that relative to single-task gait rehabilitation (ST GR), cognitive-motor dual-task (DT) GR initiated at the subacute stage would be associated with greater improvements in ST and DT gait, balance, and cognitive performance, personal autonomy, disability, and quality of life in the short, medium and long terms after stroke. METHODS: This multicenter (n=12), two-arm, parallel-group, randomized (1:1), controlled clinical study is a superiority trial. With p<0.05, a power of 80%, and an expected loss to follow-up rate of 10%, the inclusion of 300 patients will be required to evidence a 0.1-m.s(−1) gain in gait speed. Trial will include adult patients (18–90 years) in the subacute phase (0 to 6 months after a hemispheric stroke) and who are able to walk for 10 m (with or without a technical aid). Registered physiotherapists will deliver a standardized GR program (30 min three times a week, for 4 weeks). The GR program will comprise various DTs (phasic, executive function, praxis, memory, and spatial cognition tasks during gait) in the DT (experimental) group and gait exercises only in the ST (control) group. The primary outcome measure is gait speed 6 months after inclusion. The secondary outcomes are post-stroke impairments (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and the motor part of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the lower extremity), gait speed (10-m walking test), mobility and dynamic balance (timed up-and-go test), ST and DT cognitive function (the French adaptation of the harmonization standards neuropsychological battery, and eight cognitive-motor DTs), personal autonomy (functional independence measure), restrictions in participation (structured interview and the modified Rankin score), and health-related quality of life (on a visual analog scale). These variables will be assessed immediately after the end of the protocol (probing the short-term effect), 1 month thereafter (the medium-term effect), and 5 months thereafter (the long-term effect). DISCUSSION: The main study limitation is the open design. The trial will focus on a new GR program applicable at various stages after stroke and during neurological disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03009773. Registered on January 4, 2017. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07138-x. BioMed Central 2023-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9994785/ /pubmed/36890548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07138-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Tasseel-Ponche, Sophie Roussel, Martine Toba, Monica N. Sader, Thibaud Barbier, Vincent Delafontaine, Arnaud Meynier, Jonathan Picard, Carl Constans, Jean-Marc Schnitzler, Alexis Godefroy, Olivier Yelnik, Alain Pierre Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT) |
title | Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT) |
title_full | Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT) |
title_fullStr | Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT) |
title_short | Dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (SYNCOMOT) |
title_sort | dual-task versus single-task gait rehabilitation after stroke: the protocol of the cognitive-motor synergy multicenter, randomized, controlled superiority trial (syncomot) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9994785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36890548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07138-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tasseelponchesophie dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT rousselmartine dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT tobamonican dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT saderthibaud dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT barbiervincent dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT delafontainearnaud dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT meynierjonathan dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT picardcarl dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT constansjeanmarc dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT schnitzleralexis dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT godefroyolivier dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot AT yelnikalainpierre dualtaskversussingletaskgaitrehabilitationafterstroketheprotocolofthecognitivemotorsynergymulticenterrandomizedcontrolledsuperioritytrialsyncomot |