Cargando…
The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review
Genomic healthcare programmes, both in a research and clinical context, have demonstrated a pivotal opportunity to prevent, diagnose, and treat rare diseases. However, implementation factors could increase overall costs and affect uptake. As well, uncertainties remain regarding effective training, g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9995480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36517584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01259-8 |
_version_ | 1784902834252152832 |
---|---|
author | Alarcón Garavito, Germán Andrés Moniz, Thomas Déom, Noémie Redin, Federico Pichini, Amanda Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia |
author_facet | Alarcón Garavito, Germán Andrés Moniz, Thomas Déom, Noémie Redin, Federico Pichini, Amanda Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia |
author_sort | Alarcón Garavito, Germán Andrés |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genomic healthcare programmes, both in a research and clinical context, have demonstrated a pivotal opportunity to prevent, diagnose, and treat rare diseases. However, implementation factors could increase overall costs and affect uptake. As well, uncertainties remain regarding effective training, guidelines and legislation. The purpose of this rapid evidence review was to draw together the available global evidence on the implementation of genomic testing programmes, particularly on population-based screening and diagnostic programmes implemented at the national level, to understand the range of factors influencing implementation. This review involved a search of terms related to genomics, implementation and health care. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published between 2017–2022 and found in five databases. The review included thirty articles drawing on sixteen countries. A wide range of factors was cited as critical to the successful implementation of genomics programmes. These included having policy frameworks, regulations, guidelines; clinical decision support tools; access to genetic counselling; and education and training for healthcare staff. The high costs of implementing and integrating genomics into healthcare were also often barriers to stakeholders. National genomics programmes are complex and require the generation of evidence and addressing implementation challenges. The findings from this review highlight that there is a strong emphasis on addressing genomic education and engagement among varied stakeholders, including the general public, policymakers, and governments. Articles also emphasised the development of appropriate policies and regulatory frameworks to govern genomic healthcare, with a focus on legislation that regulates the collection, storage, and sharing of personal genomic data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9995480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99954802023-03-10 The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review Alarcón Garavito, Germán Andrés Moniz, Thomas Déom, Noémie Redin, Federico Pichini, Amanda Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia Eur J Hum Genet Review Article Genomic healthcare programmes, both in a research and clinical context, have demonstrated a pivotal opportunity to prevent, diagnose, and treat rare diseases. However, implementation factors could increase overall costs and affect uptake. As well, uncertainties remain regarding effective training, guidelines and legislation. The purpose of this rapid evidence review was to draw together the available global evidence on the implementation of genomic testing programmes, particularly on population-based screening and diagnostic programmes implemented at the national level, to understand the range of factors influencing implementation. This review involved a search of terms related to genomics, implementation and health care. The search was limited to peer-reviewed articles published between 2017–2022 and found in five databases. The review included thirty articles drawing on sixteen countries. A wide range of factors was cited as critical to the successful implementation of genomics programmes. These included having policy frameworks, regulations, guidelines; clinical decision support tools; access to genetic counselling; and education and training for healthcare staff. The high costs of implementing and integrating genomics into healthcare were also often barriers to stakeholders. National genomics programmes are complex and require the generation of evidence and addressing implementation challenges. The findings from this review highlight that there is a strong emphasis on addressing genomic education and engagement among varied stakeholders, including the general public, policymakers, and governments. Articles also emphasised the development of appropriate policies and regulatory frameworks to govern genomic healthcare, with a focus on legislation that regulates the collection, storage, and sharing of personal genomic data. Springer International Publishing 2022-12-14 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9995480/ /pubmed/36517584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01259-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Alarcón Garavito, Germán Andrés Moniz, Thomas Déom, Noémie Redin, Federico Pichini, Amanda Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review |
title | The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review |
title_full | The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review |
title_fullStr | The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review |
title_full_unstemmed | The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review |
title_short | The implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: A rapid evidence review |
title_sort | implementation of large-scale genomic screening or diagnostic programmes: a rapid evidence review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9995480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36517584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-022-01259-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alarcongaravitogermanandres theimplementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT monizthomas theimplementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT deomnoemie theimplementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT redinfederico theimplementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT pichiniamanda theimplementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT vindrolapadroscecilia theimplementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT alarcongaravitogermanandres implementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT monizthomas implementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT deomnoemie implementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT redinfederico implementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT pichiniamanda implementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview AT vindrolapadroscecilia implementationoflargescalegenomicscreeningordiagnosticprogrammesarapidevidencereview |