Cargando…

The correlation of muscle quantity and quality between all vertebra levels and level L3, measured with CT: An exploratory study

INTRODUCTION: In patients with cancer, low muscle mass has been associated with a higher risk of fatigue, poorer treatment outcomes, and mortality. To determine body composition with computed tomography (CT), measuring the muscle quantity at the level of lumbar 3 (L3) is suggested. However, in patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van den Broeck, Jona, Sealy, Martine J., Brussaard, Carola, Kooijman, Jasmijn, Jager-Wittenaar, Harriët, Scafoglieri, Aldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1148809
_version_ 1784902947097804800
author Van den Broeck, Jona
Sealy, Martine J.
Brussaard, Carola
Kooijman, Jasmijn
Jager-Wittenaar, Harriët
Scafoglieri, Aldo
author_facet Van den Broeck, Jona
Sealy, Martine J.
Brussaard, Carola
Kooijman, Jasmijn
Jager-Wittenaar, Harriët
Scafoglieri, Aldo
author_sort Van den Broeck, Jona
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In patients with cancer, low muscle mass has been associated with a higher risk of fatigue, poorer treatment outcomes, and mortality. To determine body composition with computed tomography (CT), measuring the muscle quantity at the level of lumbar 3 (L3) is suggested. However, in patients with cancer, CT imaging of the L3 level is not always available. Thus far, little is known about the extent to which other vertebra levels could be useful for measuring muscle status. In this study, we aimed to assess the correlation of the muscle quantity and quality between any vertebra level and L3 level in patients with various tumor localizations. METHODS: Two hundred-twenty Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-CT images of patients with four different tumor localizations were included: 1. head and neck (n = 34), 2. esophagus (n = 45), 3. lung (n = 54), and 4. melanoma (n = 87). From the whole body scan, 24 slices were used, i.e., one for each vertebra level. Two examiners contoured the muscles independently. After contouring, muscle quantity was estimated by calculating skeletal muscle area (SMA) and skeletal muscle index (SMI). Muscle quality was assessed by calculating muscle radiation attenuation (MRA). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine whether the other vertebra levels correlate with L3 level. RESULTS: For SMA, strong correlations were found between C1–C3 and L3, and C7–L5 and L3 (r = 0.72–0.95). For SMI, strong correlations were found between the levels C1–C2, C7–T5, T7–L5, and L3 (r = 0.70–0.93), respectively. For MRA, strong correlations were found between T1–L5 and L3 (r = 0.71–0.95). DISCUSSION: For muscle quantity, the correlations between the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels are good, except for the cervical levels in patients with esophageal cancer. For muscle quality, the correlations between the other levels and L3 are good, except for the cervical levels in patients with melanoma. If visualization of L3 on the CT scan is absent, the other thoracic and lumbar vertebra levels could serve as a proxy to measure muscle quantity and quality in patients with head and neck, esophageal, lung cancer, and melanoma, whereas the cervical levels may be less reliable as a proxy in some patient groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9996002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99960022023-03-10 The correlation of muscle quantity and quality between all vertebra levels and level L3, measured with CT: An exploratory study Van den Broeck, Jona Sealy, Martine J. Brussaard, Carola Kooijman, Jasmijn Jager-Wittenaar, Harriët Scafoglieri, Aldo Front Nutr Nutrition INTRODUCTION: In patients with cancer, low muscle mass has been associated with a higher risk of fatigue, poorer treatment outcomes, and mortality. To determine body composition with computed tomography (CT), measuring the muscle quantity at the level of lumbar 3 (L3) is suggested. However, in patients with cancer, CT imaging of the L3 level is not always available. Thus far, little is known about the extent to which other vertebra levels could be useful for measuring muscle status. In this study, we aimed to assess the correlation of the muscle quantity and quality between any vertebra level and L3 level in patients with various tumor localizations. METHODS: Two hundred-twenty Positron Emission Tomography (PET)-CT images of patients with four different tumor localizations were included: 1. head and neck (n = 34), 2. esophagus (n = 45), 3. lung (n = 54), and 4. melanoma (n = 87). From the whole body scan, 24 slices were used, i.e., one for each vertebra level. Two examiners contoured the muscles independently. After contouring, muscle quantity was estimated by calculating skeletal muscle area (SMA) and skeletal muscle index (SMI). Muscle quality was assessed by calculating muscle radiation attenuation (MRA). Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine whether the other vertebra levels correlate with L3 level. RESULTS: For SMA, strong correlations were found between C1–C3 and L3, and C7–L5 and L3 (r = 0.72–0.95). For SMI, strong correlations were found between the levels C1–C2, C7–T5, T7–L5, and L3 (r = 0.70–0.93), respectively. For MRA, strong correlations were found between T1–L5 and L3 (r = 0.71–0.95). DISCUSSION: For muscle quantity, the correlations between the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels are good, except for the cervical levels in patients with esophageal cancer. For muscle quality, the correlations between the other levels and L3 are good, except for the cervical levels in patients with melanoma. If visualization of L3 on the CT scan is absent, the other thoracic and lumbar vertebra levels could serve as a proxy to measure muscle quantity and quality in patients with head and neck, esophageal, lung cancer, and melanoma, whereas the cervical levels may be less reliable as a proxy in some patient groups. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9996002/ /pubmed/36908909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1148809 Text en Copyright © 2023 Van den Broeck, Sealy, Brussaard, Kooijman, Jager-Wittenaar and Scafoglieri. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Nutrition
Van den Broeck, Jona
Sealy, Martine J.
Brussaard, Carola
Kooijman, Jasmijn
Jager-Wittenaar, Harriët
Scafoglieri, Aldo
The correlation of muscle quantity and quality between all vertebra levels and level L3, measured with CT: An exploratory study
title The correlation of muscle quantity and quality between all vertebra levels and level L3, measured with CT: An exploratory study
title_full The correlation of muscle quantity and quality between all vertebra levels and level L3, measured with CT: An exploratory study
title_fullStr The correlation of muscle quantity and quality between all vertebra levels and level L3, measured with CT: An exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed The correlation of muscle quantity and quality between all vertebra levels and level L3, measured with CT: An exploratory study
title_short The correlation of muscle quantity and quality between all vertebra levels and level L3, measured with CT: An exploratory study
title_sort correlation of muscle quantity and quality between all vertebra levels and level l3, measured with ct: an exploratory study
topic Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1148809
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbroeckjona thecorrelationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT sealymartinej thecorrelationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT brussaardcarola thecorrelationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT kooijmanjasmijn thecorrelationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT jagerwittenaarharriet thecorrelationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT scafoglierialdo thecorrelationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT vandenbroeckjona correlationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT sealymartinej correlationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT brussaardcarola correlationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT kooijmanjasmijn correlationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT jagerwittenaarharriet correlationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy
AT scafoglierialdo correlationofmusclequantityandqualitybetweenallvertebralevelsandlevell3measuredwithctanexploratorystudy