Cargando…

Computerized Version of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (KSADS-COMP): Development and Validation of the Korean Clinician-Administered Version

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate the Korean version of the clinician-administered KSADS-COMP, which is the recently updated, web-based computerized version of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for school-age children (KSADS). METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jeewon, Kim, Seong-Ju, Kim, Dohyung, Yang, Su-Jin, Lee, Sangha, Lee, Areum, Shin, Yunmi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996142/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36891602
http://dx.doi.org/10.30773/pi.2022.0273
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to develop and validate the Korean version of the clinician-administered KSADS-COMP, which is the recently updated, web-based computerized version of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for school-age children (KSADS). METHODS: A total of 71 participants (mean age=12.04±3.86 years, female=29.57%) participated in the study. A child-adolescent psychiatrist established a diagnosis for the participant after a thorough psychiatric interview with the participant and the parent. Researchers who were blind to the diagnoses administered the clinician-administered KSADS-COMP to the parents and participants. The gold-standard diagnoses made by child-adolescent psychiatrists were compared to the current diagnoses generated by the clinician-administered KSADS-COMP. Percent agreement, Cohen’s Kappa, Gwet’s first-order agreement coefficient (AC1), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated. RESULTS: Gwet’s AC1, our preferred measure of agreement, showed excellent range between 0.78 and 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value and negative predictive value also showed high scores. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated excellent criterion validity of the Korean version of the clinician-administered KSADS-COMP, though the small sample size could be a limitation. The current study was the first study to examine the criterion validity of the KSADS-COMP. Due to its readily usable format and efficient and accurate diagnostic process, widely-use of KSADS-COMP is expected.