Cargando…

A low-threshold sleep intervention for improving sleep quality and well-being

BACKGROUND: Approximately one-third of the healthy population suffer from sleep problems, but only a small proportion of those affected receive professional help. Therefore, there is an urgent need for easily accessible, affordable, and efficacious sleep interventions. OBJECTIVE: A randomized contro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eigl, Esther-Sevil, Urban-Ferreira, Laura Krystin, Schabus, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1117645
_version_ 1784903008905068544
author Eigl, Esther-Sevil
Urban-Ferreira, Laura Krystin
Schabus, Manuel
author_facet Eigl, Esther-Sevil
Urban-Ferreira, Laura Krystin
Schabus, Manuel
author_sort Eigl, Esther-Sevil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately one-third of the healthy population suffer from sleep problems, but only a small proportion of those affected receive professional help. Therefore, there is an urgent need for easily accessible, affordable, and efficacious sleep interventions. OBJECTIVE: A randomized controlled study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of a low-threshold sleep intervention consisting of either (i) sleep data feedback plus sleep education or (ii) sleep data feedback alone in comparison with (iii) no intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 employees of the University of Salzburg (age: 39.51 ± 11.43 years, range: 22–62 years) were randomly assigned to one of the three groups. During the 2-week study period, objective sleep parameters were assessed via actigraphy. In addition, an online questionnaire and a daily digital diary were used to record subjective sleep parameters, work-related factors, as well as mood and well-being. After 1 week, a personal appointment was conducted with participants of both experimental group 1 (EG1) and experimental group 2 (EG2). While the EG2 only received feedback about their sleep data from week 1, the EG1 additionally received a 45-min sleep education intervention containing sleep hygiene rules and recommendations regarding stimulus control. A waiting-list control group (CG) did not receive any feedback until the end of the study. RESULTS: Results indicate positive effects on sleep and well-being following sleep monitoring over the course of 2 weeks and minimal intervention with a single in-person appointment including sleep data feedback. Improvements are seen in sleep quality, mood, vitality, and actigraphy-measured sleep efficiency (SE; EG1), as well as in well-being and sleep onset latency (SOL) in EG2. The inactive CG did not improve in any parameter. CONCLUSION: Results suggest small and beneficial effects on sleep and well-being in people being continuously monitored and receiving (actigraphy-based) sleep feedback when paired with a single-time personal intervention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9996281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99962812023-03-10 A low-threshold sleep intervention for improving sleep quality and well-being Eigl, Esther-Sevil Urban-Ferreira, Laura Krystin Schabus, Manuel Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: Approximately one-third of the healthy population suffer from sleep problems, but only a small proportion of those affected receive professional help. Therefore, there is an urgent need for easily accessible, affordable, and efficacious sleep interventions. OBJECTIVE: A randomized controlled study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of a low-threshold sleep intervention consisting of either (i) sleep data feedback plus sleep education or (ii) sleep data feedback alone in comparison with (iii) no intervention. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 100 employees of the University of Salzburg (age: 39.51 ± 11.43 years, range: 22–62 years) were randomly assigned to one of the three groups. During the 2-week study period, objective sleep parameters were assessed via actigraphy. In addition, an online questionnaire and a daily digital diary were used to record subjective sleep parameters, work-related factors, as well as mood and well-being. After 1 week, a personal appointment was conducted with participants of both experimental group 1 (EG1) and experimental group 2 (EG2). While the EG2 only received feedback about their sleep data from week 1, the EG1 additionally received a 45-min sleep education intervention containing sleep hygiene rules and recommendations regarding stimulus control. A waiting-list control group (CG) did not receive any feedback until the end of the study. RESULTS: Results indicate positive effects on sleep and well-being following sleep monitoring over the course of 2 weeks and minimal intervention with a single in-person appointment including sleep data feedback. Improvements are seen in sleep quality, mood, vitality, and actigraphy-measured sleep efficiency (SE; EG1), as well as in well-being and sleep onset latency (SOL) in EG2. The inactive CG did not improve in any parameter. CONCLUSION: Results suggest small and beneficial effects on sleep and well-being in people being continuously monitored and receiving (actigraphy-based) sleep feedback when paired with a single-time personal intervention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9996281/ /pubmed/36911132 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1117645 Text en Copyright © 2023 Eigl, Urban-Ferreira and Schabus. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Eigl, Esther-Sevil
Urban-Ferreira, Laura Krystin
Schabus, Manuel
A low-threshold sleep intervention for improving sleep quality and well-being
title A low-threshold sleep intervention for improving sleep quality and well-being
title_full A low-threshold sleep intervention for improving sleep quality and well-being
title_fullStr A low-threshold sleep intervention for improving sleep quality and well-being
title_full_unstemmed A low-threshold sleep intervention for improving sleep quality and well-being
title_short A low-threshold sleep intervention for improving sleep quality and well-being
title_sort low-threshold sleep intervention for improving sleep quality and well-being
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1117645
work_keys_str_mv AT eiglesthersevil alowthresholdsleepinterventionforimprovingsleepqualityandwellbeing
AT urbanferreiralaurakrystin alowthresholdsleepinterventionforimprovingsleepqualityandwellbeing
AT schabusmanuel alowthresholdsleepinterventionforimprovingsleepqualityandwellbeing
AT eiglesthersevil lowthresholdsleepinterventionforimprovingsleepqualityandwellbeing
AT urbanferreiralaurakrystin lowthresholdsleepinterventionforimprovingsleepqualityandwellbeing
AT schabusmanuel lowthresholdsleepinterventionforimprovingsleepqualityandwellbeing