Cargando…
Identifying and Categorizing Adverse Events in Trials of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Narrative Scoping Review of Trials in the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry
BACKGROUND: To contextualize the benefits of an intervention, it is important that adverse events (AEs) are reported. This is potentially difficult in trials of digital mental health interventions, where delivery may be remote and the mechanisms of actions less understood. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to exp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36811940 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/42501 |
_version_ | 1784903040795410432 |
---|---|
author | Gómez Bergin, Aislinn D Valentine, Althea Z Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan Slade, Mike Hollis, Chris Hall, Charlotte L |
author_facet | Gómez Bergin, Aislinn D Valentine, Althea Z Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan Slade, Mike Hollis, Chris Hall, Charlotte L |
author_sort | Gómez Bergin, Aislinn D |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To contextualize the benefits of an intervention, it is important that adverse events (AEs) are reported. This is potentially difficult in trials of digital mental health interventions, where delivery may be remote and the mechanisms of actions less understood. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the reporting of AEs in randomized controlled trials of digital mental health interventions. METHODS: The International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number database was searched for trials registered before May 2022. Using advanced search filters, we identified 2546 trials in the category of mental and behavioral disorders. These trials were independently reviewed by 2 researchers against the eligibility criteria. Trials were included where digital mental health interventions for participants with a mental health disorder were evaluated through a completed randomized controlled trial (protocol and primary results publication published). Published protocols and primary results publications were then retrieved. Data were extracted independently by 3 researchers, with discussion to reach consensus when required. RESULTS: Twenty-three trials met the eligibility criteria, of which 16 (69%) included a statement on AEs within a publication, but only 6 (26%) reported AEs within their primary results publication. Seriousness was referred to by 6 trials, relatedness by 4, and expectedness by 2. More interventions delivered with human support (9/11, 82%) than those with only remote or no support (6/12, 50%) included a statement on AEs, but they did not report more AEs. Several reasons for participant dropout were identified by trials that did not report AEs, of which some were identifiable or related to AEs, including serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in the reporting of AEs in trials of digital mental health interventions. This variation may reflect limited reporting processes and difficulty recognizing AEs related to digital mental health interventions. There is a need to develop guidelines specifically for these trials to improve future reporting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9996423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99964232023-03-10 Identifying and Categorizing Adverse Events in Trials of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Narrative Scoping Review of Trials in the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry Gómez Bergin, Aislinn D Valentine, Althea Z Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan Slade, Mike Hollis, Chris Hall, Charlotte L JMIR Ment Health Review BACKGROUND: To contextualize the benefits of an intervention, it is important that adverse events (AEs) are reported. This is potentially difficult in trials of digital mental health interventions, where delivery may be remote and the mechanisms of actions less understood. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the reporting of AEs in randomized controlled trials of digital mental health interventions. METHODS: The International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number database was searched for trials registered before May 2022. Using advanced search filters, we identified 2546 trials in the category of mental and behavioral disorders. These trials were independently reviewed by 2 researchers against the eligibility criteria. Trials were included where digital mental health interventions for participants with a mental health disorder were evaluated through a completed randomized controlled trial (protocol and primary results publication published). Published protocols and primary results publications were then retrieved. Data were extracted independently by 3 researchers, with discussion to reach consensus when required. RESULTS: Twenty-three trials met the eligibility criteria, of which 16 (69%) included a statement on AEs within a publication, but only 6 (26%) reported AEs within their primary results publication. Seriousness was referred to by 6 trials, relatedness by 4, and expectedness by 2. More interventions delivered with human support (9/11, 82%) than those with only remote or no support (6/12, 50%) included a statement on AEs, but they did not report more AEs. Several reasons for participant dropout were identified by trials that did not report AEs, of which some were identifiable or related to AEs, including serious AEs. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in the reporting of AEs in trials of digital mental health interventions. This variation may reflect limited reporting processes and difficulty recognizing AEs related to digital mental health interventions. There is a need to develop guidelines specifically for these trials to improve future reporting. JMIR Publications 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9996423/ /pubmed/36811940 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/42501 Text en ©Aislinn D Gómez Bergin, Althea Z Valentine, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone, Mike Slade, Chris Hollis, Charlotte L Hall. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org), 22.02.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Gómez Bergin, Aislinn D Valentine, Althea Z Rennick-Egglestone, Stefan Slade, Mike Hollis, Chris Hall, Charlotte L Identifying and Categorizing Adverse Events in Trials of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Narrative Scoping Review of Trials in the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry |
title | Identifying and Categorizing Adverse Events in Trials of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Narrative Scoping Review of Trials in the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry |
title_full | Identifying and Categorizing Adverse Events in Trials of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Narrative Scoping Review of Trials in the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry |
title_fullStr | Identifying and Categorizing Adverse Events in Trials of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Narrative Scoping Review of Trials in the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Identifying and Categorizing Adverse Events in Trials of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Narrative Scoping Review of Trials in the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry |
title_short | Identifying and Categorizing Adverse Events in Trials of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Narrative Scoping Review of Trials in the International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry |
title_sort | identifying and categorizing adverse events in trials of digital mental health interventions: narrative scoping review of trials in the international standard randomized controlled trial number registry |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36811940 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/42501 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomezberginaislinnd identifyingandcategorizingadverseeventsintrialsofdigitalmentalhealthinterventionsnarrativescopingreviewoftrialsintheinternationalstandardrandomizedcontrolledtrialnumberregistry AT valentinealtheaz identifyingandcategorizingadverseeventsintrialsofdigitalmentalhealthinterventionsnarrativescopingreviewoftrialsintheinternationalstandardrandomizedcontrolledtrialnumberregistry AT rennickegglestonestefan identifyingandcategorizingadverseeventsintrialsofdigitalmentalhealthinterventionsnarrativescopingreviewoftrialsintheinternationalstandardrandomizedcontrolledtrialnumberregistry AT slademike identifyingandcategorizingadverseeventsintrialsofdigitalmentalhealthinterventionsnarrativescopingreviewoftrialsintheinternationalstandardrandomizedcontrolledtrialnumberregistry AT hollischris identifyingandcategorizingadverseeventsintrialsofdigitalmentalhealthinterventionsnarrativescopingreviewoftrialsintheinternationalstandardrandomizedcontrolledtrialnumberregistry AT hallcharlottel identifyingandcategorizingadverseeventsintrialsofdigitalmentalhealthinterventionsnarrativescopingreviewoftrialsintheinternationalstandardrandomizedcontrolledtrialnumberregistry |