Cargando…

Factors impacting informed consent in cosmetic breast augmentation

BACKGROUND: For women who undergo cosmetic breast augmentation, their post-operative risk assessment may not match their pre-operative understanding of the involved risks and likelihood of revision surgeries. This may be due to the potential issues surrounding whether patients are being fully inform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whyte, Stephen, Bray, Laura, Brumpton, Martin, Chan, Ho Fai, Peltz, Tim S., Tamar, Manisha, Dulleck, Uwe, Hutmacher, Dietmar W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36868139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.02.007
_version_ 1784903044688773120
author Whyte, Stephen
Bray, Laura
Brumpton, Martin
Chan, Ho Fai
Peltz, Tim S.
Tamar, Manisha
Dulleck, Uwe
Hutmacher, Dietmar W.
author_facet Whyte, Stephen
Bray, Laura
Brumpton, Martin
Chan, Ho Fai
Peltz, Tim S.
Tamar, Manisha
Dulleck, Uwe
Hutmacher, Dietmar W.
author_sort Whyte, Stephen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For women who undergo cosmetic breast augmentation, their post-operative risk assessment may not match their pre-operative understanding of the involved risks and likelihood of revision surgeries. This may be due to the potential issues surrounding whether patients are being fully informed about all possible risks and related financial implications during the consent phases of patient/doctor consultation. METHODS: To explore comprehension, risk preference, and perceptions of breast augmentation procedure, we conducted a recorded online experiment with 178 women (18–40 years) who received varying amounts of risk-related information from two experienced breast surgeons in a hypothetical first consultation scenario. RESULTS: We find patient's age, self-rated health, income, education level, and openness to experience to be significant factors impacting initial breast augmentation risk preferences (before receiving any risk information). Further, more emotionally stable patients perceived greater breast augmentation risks, were less likely to recommend breast augmentation, and were more likely to acknowledge the likelihood for future revision surgery. After providing women with risk-related information we find increases in risk assessment in all treatment conditions, and that increased amounts of risk information do decrease women's willingness to recommend breast augmentation. But that increased risk information does not appear to increase women's assessment of the likelihood of future revision surgery. Finally, we find some participant individual differences (such as education level, having children, conscientiousness and emotional stability) appear to impact risk assessment post receiving risk information. CONCLUSION: Continuous improvement of the informed consent consultation process is vital to optimising patient outcomes efficiently and cost-effectively. Greater acknowledgement and emphasis on disclosure of related risks and financial burden when complications arise is also important. As such, future behavioural research is warranted into the factors impacting women's understanding both prior to and across the BA informed consent process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9996440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99964402023-03-10 Factors impacting informed consent in cosmetic breast augmentation Whyte, Stephen Bray, Laura Brumpton, Martin Chan, Ho Fai Peltz, Tim S. Tamar, Manisha Dulleck, Uwe Hutmacher, Dietmar W. Breast Original Article BACKGROUND: For women who undergo cosmetic breast augmentation, their post-operative risk assessment may not match their pre-operative understanding of the involved risks and likelihood of revision surgeries. This may be due to the potential issues surrounding whether patients are being fully informed about all possible risks and related financial implications during the consent phases of patient/doctor consultation. METHODS: To explore comprehension, risk preference, and perceptions of breast augmentation procedure, we conducted a recorded online experiment with 178 women (18–40 years) who received varying amounts of risk-related information from two experienced breast surgeons in a hypothetical first consultation scenario. RESULTS: We find patient's age, self-rated health, income, education level, and openness to experience to be significant factors impacting initial breast augmentation risk preferences (before receiving any risk information). Further, more emotionally stable patients perceived greater breast augmentation risks, were less likely to recommend breast augmentation, and were more likely to acknowledge the likelihood for future revision surgery. After providing women with risk-related information we find increases in risk assessment in all treatment conditions, and that increased amounts of risk information do decrease women's willingness to recommend breast augmentation. But that increased risk information does not appear to increase women's assessment of the likelihood of future revision surgery. Finally, we find some participant individual differences (such as education level, having children, conscientiousness and emotional stability) appear to impact risk assessment post receiving risk information. CONCLUSION: Continuous improvement of the informed consent consultation process is vital to optimising patient outcomes efficiently and cost-effectively. Greater acknowledgement and emphasis on disclosure of related risks and financial burden when complications arise is also important. As such, future behavioural research is warranted into the factors impacting women's understanding both prior to and across the BA informed consent process. Elsevier 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9996440/ /pubmed/36868139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.02.007 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Whyte, Stephen
Bray, Laura
Brumpton, Martin
Chan, Ho Fai
Peltz, Tim S.
Tamar, Manisha
Dulleck, Uwe
Hutmacher, Dietmar W.
Factors impacting informed consent in cosmetic breast augmentation
title Factors impacting informed consent in cosmetic breast augmentation
title_full Factors impacting informed consent in cosmetic breast augmentation
title_fullStr Factors impacting informed consent in cosmetic breast augmentation
title_full_unstemmed Factors impacting informed consent in cosmetic breast augmentation
title_short Factors impacting informed consent in cosmetic breast augmentation
title_sort factors impacting informed consent in cosmetic breast augmentation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36868139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.02.007
work_keys_str_mv AT whytestephen factorsimpactinginformedconsentincosmeticbreastaugmentation
AT braylaura factorsimpactinginformedconsentincosmeticbreastaugmentation
AT brumptonmartin factorsimpactinginformedconsentincosmeticbreastaugmentation
AT chanhofai factorsimpactinginformedconsentincosmeticbreastaugmentation
AT peltztims factorsimpactinginformedconsentincosmeticbreastaugmentation
AT tamarmanisha factorsimpactinginformedconsentincosmeticbreastaugmentation
AT dulleckuwe factorsimpactinginformedconsentincosmeticbreastaugmentation
AT hutmacherdietmarw factorsimpactinginformedconsentincosmeticbreastaugmentation