Cargando…

How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning?

Introduction  YouTube is one of the top-searched online video streaming platforms. However, the content of YouTube may not match the standards required for clinical skills learning. Therefore, we investigated the quality of top-viewed YouTube videos related to three basic surgical procedures that ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Tarun, Haidery, Tariq H, Sharma, Ripudaman, Sharma, Sandeep, Kumar, Arvind
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909043
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34718
_version_ 1784903095321362432
author Gupta, Tarun
Haidery, Tariq H
Sharma, Ripudaman
Sharma, Sandeep
Kumar, Arvind
author_facet Gupta, Tarun
Haidery, Tariq H
Sharma, Ripudaman
Sharma, Sandeep
Kumar, Arvind
author_sort Gupta, Tarun
collection PubMed
description Introduction  YouTube is one of the top-searched online video streaming platforms. However, the content of YouTube may not match the standards required for clinical skills learning. Therefore, we investigated the quality of top-viewed YouTube videos related to three basic surgical procedures that need to be performed by general surgery residents in their first year of training in our institute. Methods  We searched YouTube for the top 10 viewed demonstration videos related to ultrasound-guided abscess drainage, chest tube insertion, and central line insertion. For the eligible videos, we calculated the likes ratio, view ratio, and video power index. The videos’ quality was assessed using LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) scores. The videos were categorized into high-quality (LAP-VEGaS score ≥ 11) and low-quality videos (LAP-VEGaS score < 11). The different descriptive (view counts, duration, and likes-dislikes) and calculated parameters stated above were compared between the two video quality-based groups. Results The selected videos were uploaded between July 2008 and March 2022. Their mean view counts were 460391.13±373760.19. Their mean video duration was 8.12±4.26 minutes. Their mean likes and dislikes were 2578.38±2977.43 and 144.10±129.80, respectively. The mean like ratio and the mean view ratio were 93.42±13.53 and 317.76±827.79, respectively. The mean video power index was 310.67±827.96. The mean LAP-VEGaS scores for ultrasound-guided abscess drainage, chest tube insertion, and central line insertion-related videos were 6.80, 11.10, and 11.20, respectively. The numbers of likes and dislikes were significantly higher for high-quality videos. Conversely, the view counts, the view ratio, and the video power index were significantly lower for high-quality videos. Conclusion  Top-viewed videos related to general surgery procedural demonstrations are of low quality. The video view counts, popularity, and likes-dislikes are highly unreliable indicators of surgical video’s usefulness. There is a need for regulatory mechanisms to screen the YouTube content suitable for general surgery residents learning. The residents should therefore be cautious while making inferences based on YouTube videos.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9996672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99966722023-03-10 How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning? Gupta, Tarun Haidery, Tariq H Sharma, Ripudaman Sharma, Sandeep Kumar, Arvind Cureus Medical Education Introduction  YouTube is one of the top-searched online video streaming platforms. However, the content of YouTube may not match the standards required for clinical skills learning. Therefore, we investigated the quality of top-viewed YouTube videos related to three basic surgical procedures that need to be performed by general surgery residents in their first year of training in our institute. Methods  We searched YouTube for the top 10 viewed demonstration videos related to ultrasound-guided abscess drainage, chest tube insertion, and central line insertion. For the eligible videos, we calculated the likes ratio, view ratio, and video power index. The videos’ quality was assessed using LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) scores. The videos were categorized into high-quality (LAP-VEGaS score ≥ 11) and low-quality videos (LAP-VEGaS score < 11). The different descriptive (view counts, duration, and likes-dislikes) and calculated parameters stated above were compared between the two video quality-based groups. Results The selected videos were uploaded between July 2008 and March 2022. Their mean view counts were 460391.13±373760.19. Their mean video duration was 8.12±4.26 minutes. Their mean likes and dislikes were 2578.38±2977.43 and 144.10±129.80, respectively. The mean like ratio and the mean view ratio were 93.42±13.53 and 317.76±827.79, respectively. The mean video power index was 310.67±827.96. The mean LAP-VEGaS scores for ultrasound-guided abscess drainage, chest tube insertion, and central line insertion-related videos were 6.80, 11.10, and 11.20, respectively. The numbers of likes and dislikes were significantly higher for high-quality videos. Conversely, the view counts, the view ratio, and the video power index were significantly lower for high-quality videos. Conclusion  Top-viewed videos related to general surgery procedural demonstrations are of low quality. The video view counts, popularity, and likes-dislikes are highly unreliable indicators of surgical video’s usefulness. There is a need for regulatory mechanisms to screen the YouTube content suitable for general surgery residents learning. The residents should therefore be cautious while making inferences based on YouTube videos. Cureus 2023-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9996672/ /pubmed/36909043 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34718 Text en Copyright © 2023, Gupta et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Gupta, Tarun
Haidery, Tariq H
Sharma, Ripudaman
Sharma, Sandeep
Kumar, Arvind
How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning?
title How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning?
title_full How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning?
title_fullStr How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning?
title_full_unstemmed How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning?
title_short How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning?
title_sort how reliable are youtube videos for general surgery residents learning?
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909043
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34718
work_keys_str_mv AT guptatarun howreliableareyoutubevideosforgeneralsurgeryresidentslearning
AT haiderytariqh howreliableareyoutubevideosforgeneralsurgeryresidentslearning
AT sharmaripudaman howreliableareyoutubevideosforgeneralsurgeryresidentslearning
AT sharmasandeep howreliableareyoutubevideosforgeneralsurgeryresidentslearning
AT kumararvind howreliableareyoutubevideosforgeneralsurgeryresidentslearning