Cargando…

Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice

BACKGROUND: Air pollution has emerged as an unexpected risk factor for diabetes. However, the mechanism behind remains ill-defined. So far, the lung has been considered as the main target organ of air pollution. In contrast, the gut has received little scientific attention. Since air pollution parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosch, Angela J. T., Rohm, Theresa V., AlAsfoor, Shefaa, Low, Andy J. Y., Keller, Lena, Baumann, Zora, Parayil, Neena, Stawiski, Marc, Rachid, Leila, Dervos, Thomas, Mitrovic, Sandra, Meier, Daniel T., Cavelti-Weder, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-023-00518-w
_version_ 1784903145257697280
author Bosch, Angela J. T.
Rohm, Theresa V.
AlAsfoor, Shefaa
Low, Andy J. Y.
Keller, Lena
Baumann, Zora
Parayil, Neena
Stawiski, Marc
Rachid, Leila
Dervos, Thomas
Mitrovic, Sandra
Meier, Daniel T.
Cavelti-Weder, Claudia
author_facet Bosch, Angela J. T.
Rohm, Theresa V.
AlAsfoor, Shefaa
Low, Andy J. Y.
Keller, Lena
Baumann, Zora
Parayil, Neena
Stawiski, Marc
Rachid, Leila
Dervos, Thomas
Mitrovic, Sandra
Meier, Daniel T.
Cavelti-Weder, Claudia
author_sort Bosch, Angela J. T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Air pollution has emerged as an unexpected risk factor for diabetes. However, the mechanism behind remains ill-defined. So far, the lung has been considered as the main target organ of air pollution. In contrast, the gut has received little scientific attention. Since air pollution particles can reach the gut after mucociliary clearance from the lungs and through contaminated food, our aim was to assess whether exposure deposition of air pollution particles in the lung or the gut drive metabolic dysfunction in mice. METHODS: To study the effects of gut versus lung exposure, we exposed mice on standard diet to diesel exhaust particles (DEP; NIST 1650b), particulate matter (PM; NIST 1649b) or phosphate-buffered saline by either intratracheal instillation (30 µg 2 days/week) or gavage (12 µg 5 days/week) over at least 3 months (total dose of 60 µg/week for both administration routes, equivalent to a daily inhalation exposure in humans of 160 µg/m(3) PM(2.5)) and monitored metabolic parameters and tissue changes. Additionally, we tested the impact of the exposure route in a “prestressed” condition (high-fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ)). RESULTS: Mice on standard diet exposed to particulate air pollutants by intratracheal instillation developed lung inflammation. While both lung and gut exposure resulted in increased liver lipids, glucose intolerance and impaired insulin secretion was only observed in mice exposed to particles by gavage. Gavage with DEP created an inflammatory milieu in the gut as shown by up-regulated gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and monocyte/macrophage markers. In contrast, liver and adipose inflammation markers were not increased. Beta-cell secretory capacity was impaired on a functional level, most likely induced by the inflammatory milieu in the gut, and not due to beta-cell loss. The differential metabolic effects of lung and gut exposures were confirmed in a “prestressed” HFD/STZ model. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that separate lung and gut exposures to air pollution particles lead to distinct metabolic outcomes in mice. Both exposure routes elevate liver lipids, while gut exposure to particulate air pollutants specifically impairs beta-cell secretory capacity, potentially instigated by an inflammatory milieu in the gut. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12989-023-00518-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9996885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99968852023-03-10 Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice Bosch, Angela J. T. Rohm, Theresa V. AlAsfoor, Shefaa Low, Andy J. Y. Keller, Lena Baumann, Zora Parayil, Neena Stawiski, Marc Rachid, Leila Dervos, Thomas Mitrovic, Sandra Meier, Daniel T. Cavelti-Weder, Claudia Part Fibre Toxicol Research BACKGROUND: Air pollution has emerged as an unexpected risk factor for diabetes. However, the mechanism behind remains ill-defined. So far, the lung has been considered as the main target organ of air pollution. In contrast, the gut has received little scientific attention. Since air pollution particles can reach the gut after mucociliary clearance from the lungs and through contaminated food, our aim was to assess whether exposure deposition of air pollution particles in the lung or the gut drive metabolic dysfunction in mice. METHODS: To study the effects of gut versus lung exposure, we exposed mice on standard diet to diesel exhaust particles (DEP; NIST 1650b), particulate matter (PM; NIST 1649b) or phosphate-buffered saline by either intratracheal instillation (30 µg 2 days/week) or gavage (12 µg 5 days/week) over at least 3 months (total dose of 60 µg/week for both administration routes, equivalent to a daily inhalation exposure in humans of 160 µg/m(3) PM(2.5)) and monitored metabolic parameters and tissue changes. Additionally, we tested the impact of the exposure route in a “prestressed” condition (high-fat diet (HFD) and streptozotocin (STZ)). RESULTS: Mice on standard diet exposed to particulate air pollutants by intratracheal instillation developed lung inflammation. While both lung and gut exposure resulted in increased liver lipids, glucose intolerance and impaired insulin secretion was only observed in mice exposed to particles by gavage. Gavage with DEP created an inflammatory milieu in the gut as shown by up-regulated gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and monocyte/macrophage markers. In contrast, liver and adipose inflammation markers were not increased. Beta-cell secretory capacity was impaired on a functional level, most likely induced by the inflammatory milieu in the gut, and not due to beta-cell loss. The differential metabolic effects of lung and gut exposures were confirmed in a “prestressed” HFD/STZ model. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that separate lung and gut exposures to air pollution particles lead to distinct metabolic outcomes in mice. Both exposure routes elevate liver lipids, while gut exposure to particulate air pollutants specifically impairs beta-cell secretory capacity, potentially instigated by an inflammatory milieu in the gut. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12989-023-00518-w. BioMed Central 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9996885/ /pubmed/36895000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-023-00518-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bosch, Angela J. T.
Rohm, Theresa V.
AlAsfoor, Shefaa
Low, Andy J. Y.
Keller, Lena
Baumann, Zora
Parayil, Neena
Stawiski, Marc
Rachid, Leila
Dervos, Thomas
Mitrovic, Sandra
Meier, Daniel T.
Cavelti-Weder, Claudia
Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice
title Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice
title_full Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice
title_fullStr Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice
title_full_unstemmed Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice
title_short Lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice
title_sort lung versus gut exposure to air pollution particles differentially affect metabolic health in mice
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9996885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36895000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12989-023-00518-w
work_keys_str_mv AT boschangelajt lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT rohmtheresav lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT alasfoorshefaa lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT lowandyjy lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT kellerlena lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT baumannzora lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT parayilneena lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT stawiskimarc lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT rachidleila lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT dervosthomas lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT mitrovicsandra lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT meierdanielt lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice
AT caveltiwederclaudia lungversusgutexposuretoairpollutionparticlesdifferentiallyaffectmetabolichealthinmice