Cargando…

Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice

Cutaneous melanoma represents a major cause of cancer death in Europe. Without adequate therapy, the 5-year survival rate is 15–20% in distant metastatic disease. Evaluating the status quo of treatment standards in advanced melanoma and rationale for therapy decisions in Switzerland between January...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangana, Joanna, Zihler, Deborah, Bossart, Simon, Brönnimann, Daniel, Zachariah, Ralph, Gérard, Camille Léa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9997623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000000843
_version_ 1784903294430216192
author Mangana, Joanna
Zihler, Deborah
Bossart, Simon
Brönnimann, Daniel
Zachariah, Ralph
Gérard, Camille Léa
author_facet Mangana, Joanna
Zihler, Deborah
Bossart, Simon
Brönnimann, Daniel
Zachariah, Ralph
Gérard, Camille Léa
author_sort Mangana, Joanna
collection PubMed
description Cutaneous melanoma represents a major cause of cancer death in Europe. Without adequate therapy, the 5-year survival rate is 15–20% in distant metastatic disease. Evaluating the status quo of treatment standards in advanced melanoma and rationale for therapy decisions in Switzerland between January 2016 and September 2018. In this retrospective, anonymized registry, data of male and female patients with unresectable advanced/metastatic BRAF-positive cutaneous melanoma treated in first-, second- and third-line with registered substances were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Forty-one patients (56.1% male) were included providing a total of 70 treatment lines (first-line: n = 41; second-line: n = 18; and third-line: n = 11). Within the patients presenting with stage III or IV melanoma, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors was more frequently administered as first-line treatment than targeted therapy (TT) (70.7% vs. 29.3%). Across all lines, patients received TT in 47.1% (predominantly combined BRAF-MEK-inhibition) and immunotherapy in 52.9% of the cases (anti-PD-1 monotherapy in 62.2% and anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 combinations in 37.8%). Most commonly, the treatment type was switched from TT to immunotherapy or vice versa upon disease progression. The most frequent rationales for prescribing either TT or immunotherapy were physician’s preference (40.0%) or remission pressure (28.6%), respectively. Disease progression led to treatment discontinuation more frequently than undesired events. Patients in Switzerland with unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma predominantly receive guideline-recommended treatments. IO was used as predominant front-line therapy, with TT/immunotherapy switch being the predominant treatment principle. Sequencing studies are underway to identify the optimal treatment regimen for those patients. 32: 366–372 Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9997623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99976232023-03-09 Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice Mangana, Joanna Zihler, Deborah Bossart, Simon Brönnimann, Daniel Zachariah, Ralph Gérard, Camille Léa Melanoma Res Original Articles: Clinical Research Cutaneous melanoma represents a major cause of cancer death in Europe. Without adequate therapy, the 5-year survival rate is 15–20% in distant metastatic disease. Evaluating the status quo of treatment standards in advanced melanoma and rationale for therapy decisions in Switzerland between January 2016 and September 2018. In this retrospective, anonymized registry, data of male and female patients with unresectable advanced/metastatic BRAF-positive cutaneous melanoma treated in first-, second- and third-line with registered substances were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Forty-one patients (56.1% male) were included providing a total of 70 treatment lines (first-line: n = 41; second-line: n = 18; and third-line: n = 11). Within the patients presenting with stage III or IV melanoma, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors was more frequently administered as first-line treatment than targeted therapy (TT) (70.7% vs. 29.3%). Across all lines, patients received TT in 47.1% (predominantly combined BRAF-MEK-inhibition) and immunotherapy in 52.9% of the cases (anti-PD-1 monotherapy in 62.2% and anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 combinations in 37.8%). Most commonly, the treatment type was switched from TT to immunotherapy or vice versa upon disease progression. The most frequent rationales for prescribing either TT or immunotherapy were physician’s preference (40.0%) or remission pressure (28.6%), respectively. Disease progression led to treatment discontinuation more frequently than undesired events. Patients in Switzerland with unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma predominantly receive guideline-recommended treatments. IO was used as predominant front-line therapy, with TT/immunotherapy switch being the predominant treatment principle. Sequencing studies are underway to identify the optimal treatment regimen for those patients. 32: 366–372 Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-07-20 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9997623/ /pubmed/35855650 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000000843 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Articles: Clinical Research
Mangana, Joanna
Zihler, Deborah
Bossart, Simon
Brönnimann, Daniel
Zachariah, Ralph
Gérard, Camille Léa
Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice
title Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice
title_full Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice
title_fullStr Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice
title_full_unstemmed Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice
title_short Treatment reality of patients with BRAF-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in Switzerland in the era of choice
title_sort treatment reality of patients with braf-mutant advanced/metastatic melanoma in switzerland in the era of choice
topic Original Articles: Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9997623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855650
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CMR.0000000000000843
work_keys_str_mv AT manganajoanna treatmentrealityofpatientswithbrafmutantadvancedmetastaticmelanomainswitzerlandintheeraofchoice
AT zihlerdeborah treatmentrealityofpatientswithbrafmutantadvancedmetastaticmelanomainswitzerlandintheeraofchoice
AT bossartsimon treatmentrealityofpatientswithbrafmutantadvancedmetastaticmelanomainswitzerlandintheeraofchoice
AT bronnimanndaniel treatmentrealityofpatientswithbrafmutantadvancedmetastaticmelanomainswitzerlandintheeraofchoice
AT zachariahralph treatmentrealityofpatientswithbrafmutantadvancedmetastaticmelanomainswitzerlandintheeraofchoice
AT gerardcamillelea treatmentrealityofpatientswithbrafmutantadvancedmetastaticmelanomainswitzerlandintheeraofchoice