Cargando…
Reproducibility of infant fNIRS studies: a meta-analytic approach
SIGNIFICANCE: Concerns about the reproducibility of experimental findings have recently emerged in many disciplines, from psychology to medicine and neuroscience. As NIRS is a relatively recent brain imaging technique, the question of reproducibility has not yet been systematically addressed. AIM: T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9997722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.10.2.023518 |
_version_ | 1784903313269981184 |
---|---|
author | Gemignani, Jessica de la Cruz-Pavía, Irene Martinez, Anna Nallet, Caroline Pasquini, Alessia Lucarini, Gaia Cavicchiolo, Francesca Gervain, Judit |
author_facet | Gemignani, Jessica de la Cruz-Pavía, Irene Martinez, Anna Nallet, Caroline Pasquini, Alessia Lucarini, Gaia Cavicchiolo, Francesca Gervain, Judit |
author_sort | Gemignani, Jessica |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIGNIFICANCE: Concerns about the reproducibility of experimental findings have recently emerged in many disciplines, from psychology to medicine and neuroscience. As NIRS is a relatively recent brain imaging technique, the question of reproducibility has not yet been systematically addressed. AIM: The current study seeks to test the replicability of effects observed in NIRS experiments assessing young infants’ rule-learning ability. APPROACH: We conducted meta-analyses and mixed-effects modeling-based inferential statistics to determine whether effect sizes were replicable and comparable in a sample of 23 NIRS studies investigating infants’ abilities to process repetition- and diversity-based regularities in linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory and visual sequences. Additionally, we tested whether effect sizes were modulated by different factors such as the age of participants or the laboratory. We obtained NIRS data from 12 published and 11 unpublished studies. The 23 studies involved a total of 487 infants, aged between 0 and 9 months, tested in four different countries (Canada, France, Italy, and USA). RESULTS: Our most important finding is that study and laboratory were never significant moderators of variation in effect sizes, indicating that results replicated reliably across the different studies and labs included in the sample. We observed small-to-moderate effect sizes, similar to effect sizes found with other neuroimaging and behavioral techniques in the developmental literature. In line with existing findings, effect sizes were modulated by the participants’ age and differed across the different regularities tested, with repetition-based regularities giving rise to the strongest effects; in particular, the overall magnitude of this effect in the left temporal region was 0.27 when analyzing the entire dataset. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis is a useful tool for assessing replicability and cross-study variability. Here, we have shown that infant NIRS studies in the language domain replicate robustly across various NIRS machines, testing sites, and developmental populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9997722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99977222023-03-10 Reproducibility of infant fNIRS studies: a meta-analytic approach Gemignani, Jessica de la Cruz-Pavía, Irene Martinez, Anna Nallet, Caroline Pasquini, Alessia Lucarini, Gaia Cavicchiolo, Francesca Gervain, Judit Neurophotonics Special Section Celebrating 30 Years of Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (Part II) SIGNIFICANCE: Concerns about the reproducibility of experimental findings have recently emerged in many disciplines, from psychology to medicine and neuroscience. As NIRS is a relatively recent brain imaging technique, the question of reproducibility has not yet been systematically addressed. AIM: The current study seeks to test the replicability of effects observed in NIRS experiments assessing young infants’ rule-learning ability. APPROACH: We conducted meta-analyses and mixed-effects modeling-based inferential statistics to determine whether effect sizes were replicable and comparable in a sample of 23 NIRS studies investigating infants’ abilities to process repetition- and diversity-based regularities in linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory and visual sequences. Additionally, we tested whether effect sizes were modulated by different factors such as the age of participants or the laboratory. We obtained NIRS data from 12 published and 11 unpublished studies. The 23 studies involved a total of 487 infants, aged between 0 and 9 months, tested in four different countries (Canada, France, Italy, and USA). RESULTS: Our most important finding is that study and laboratory were never significant moderators of variation in effect sizes, indicating that results replicated reliably across the different studies and labs included in the sample. We observed small-to-moderate effect sizes, similar to effect sizes found with other neuroimaging and behavioral techniques in the developmental literature. In line with existing findings, effect sizes were modulated by the participants’ age and differed across the different regularities tested, with repetition-based regularities giving rise to the strongest effects; in particular, the overall magnitude of this effect in the left temporal region was 0.27 when analyzing the entire dataset. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analysis is a useful tool for assessing replicability and cross-study variability. Here, we have shown that infant NIRS studies in the language domain replicate robustly across various NIRS machines, testing sites, and developmental populations. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2023-03-08 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9997722/ /pubmed/36908681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.10.2.023518 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. |
spellingShingle | Special Section Celebrating 30 Years of Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (Part II) Gemignani, Jessica de la Cruz-Pavía, Irene Martinez, Anna Nallet, Caroline Pasquini, Alessia Lucarini, Gaia Cavicchiolo, Francesca Gervain, Judit Reproducibility of infant fNIRS studies: a meta-analytic approach |
title | Reproducibility of infant fNIRS studies: a meta-analytic approach |
title_full | Reproducibility of infant fNIRS studies: a meta-analytic approach |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility of infant fNIRS studies: a meta-analytic approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of infant fNIRS studies: a meta-analytic approach |
title_short | Reproducibility of infant fNIRS studies: a meta-analytic approach |
title_sort | reproducibility of infant fnirs studies: a meta-analytic approach |
topic | Special Section Celebrating 30 Years of Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (Part II) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9997722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.10.2.023518 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gemignanijessica reproducibilityofinfantfnirsstudiesametaanalyticapproach AT delacruzpaviairene reproducibilityofinfantfnirsstudiesametaanalyticapproach AT martinezanna reproducibilityofinfantfnirsstudiesametaanalyticapproach AT nalletcaroline reproducibilityofinfantfnirsstudiesametaanalyticapproach AT pasquinialessia reproducibilityofinfantfnirsstudiesametaanalyticapproach AT lucarinigaia reproducibilityofinfantfnirsstudiesametaanalyticapproach AT cavicchiolofrancesca reproducibilityofinfantfnirsstudiesametaanalyticapproach AT gervainjudit reproducibilityofinfantfnirsstudiesametaanalyticapproach |