Cargando…

Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review

BACKGROUND: Theory of Change (ToC) has become an established approach to design and evaluate interventions. While ToC should—in line with the growing international focus on evidence-informed health decision-making–consider explicit approaches to incorporate evidence, there is limited guidance on how...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques, Setti, Cecilia, Arruda, Leo Heikiti Maeda, de Melo, Roberta Crevelário, de Araujo, Bruna Carolina, Tan, Audrey R., DeMaio, Peter Nichols, Kuchenmüller, Tanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9997872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36893160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282808
_version_ 1784903348041809920
author Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques
Setti, Cecilia
Arruda, Leo Heikiti Maeda
de Melo, Roberta Crevelário
de Araujo, Bruna Carolina
Tan, Audrey R.
DeMaio, Peter Nichols
Kuchenmüller, Tanja
author_facet Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques
Setti, Cecilia
Arruda, Leo Heikiti Maeda
de Melo, Roberta Crevelário
de Araujo, Bruna Carolina
Tan, Audrey R.
DeMaio, Peter Nichols
Kuchenmüller, Tanja
author_sort Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Theory of Change (ToC) has become an established approach to design and evaluate interventions. While ToC should—in line with the growing international focus on evidence-informed health decision-making–consider explicit approaches to incorporate evidence, there is limited guidance on how this should be done. This rapid review aims to identify and synthesize the available literature on how to systematically use research evidence when developing or adapting ToCs in the health sector. METHODS: A rapid review methodology using a systematic approach, was designed. Eight electronic databases were consulted to search for peer-reviewed and gray publications detailing tools, methods, and recommendations promoting the systematic integration of research evidence in ToCs. The included studies were compared, and the findings summarized qualitatively into themes to identify key principles, stages, and procedures, guiding the systematic integration of research evidence when developing or revising a ToC. RESULTS: This review included 18 studies. The main sources from which evidence was retrieved in the ToC development process were institutional data, literature searches, and stakeholder consultation. There was a variety of ways of finding and using evidence in ToC. Firstly, the review provided an overview of existing definitions of ToC, methods applied in ToC development and the related ToC stages. Secondly, a typology of 7 stages relevant for evidence integration into ToCs was developed, outlining the types of evidence and research methods the included studies applied for each of the proposed stages. CONCLUSION: This rapid review adds to the existing literature in two ways. First, it provides an up-to-date and comprehensive review of the existing methods for incorporating evidence into ToC development in the health sector. Second, it offers a new typology guiding any future endeavors of incorporating evidence into ToCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9997872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99978722023-03-10 Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques Setti, Cecilia Arruda, Leo Heikiti Maeda de Melo, Roberta Crevelário de Araujo, Bruna Carolina Tan, Audrey R. DeMaio, Peter Nichols Kuchenmüller, Tanja PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Theory of Change (ToC) has become an established approach to design and evaluate interventions. While ToC should—in line with the growing international focus on evidence-informed health decision-making–consider explicit approaches to incorporate evidence, there is limited guidance on how this should be done. This rapid review aims to identify and synthesize the available literature on how to systematically use research evidence when developing or adapting ToCs in the health sector. METHODS: A rapid review methodology using a systematic approach, was designed. Eight electronic databases were consulted to search for peer-reviewed and gray publications detailing tools, methods, and recommendations promoting the systematic integration of research evidence in ToCs. The included studies were compared, and the findings summarized qualitatively into themes to identify key principles, stages, and procedures, guiding the systematic integration of research evidence when developing or revising a ToC. RESULTS: This review included 18 studies. The main sources from which evidence was retrieved in the ToC development process were institutional data, literature searches, and stakeholder consultation. There was a variety of ways of finding and using evidence in ToC. Firstly, the review provided an overview of existing definitions of ToC, methods applied in ToC development and the related ToC stages. Secondly, a typology of 7 stages relevant for evidence integration into ToCs was developed, outlining the types of evidence and research methods the included studies applied for each of the proposed stages. CONCLUSION: This rapid review adds to the existing literature in two ways. First, it provides an up-to-date and comprehensive review of the existing methods for incorporating evidence into ToC development in the health sector. Second, it offers a new typology guiding any future endeavors of incorporating evidence into ToCs. Public Library of Science 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9997872/ /pubmed/36893160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282808 Text en © 2023 Romão et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques
Setti, Cecilia
Arruda, Leo Heikiti Maeda
de Melo, Roberta Crevelário
de Araujo, Bruna Carolina
Tan, Audrey R.
DeMaio, Peter Nichols
Kuchenmüller, Tanja
Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review
title Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review
title_full Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review
title_fullStr Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review
title_short Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review
title_sort integration of evidence into theory of change frameworks in the healthcare sector: a rapid systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9997872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36893160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282808
work_keys_str_mv AT romaodavimamblonamarques integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview
AT setticecilia integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview
AT arrudaleoheikitimaeda integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview
AT demelorobertacrevelario integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview
AT dearaujobrunacarolina integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview
AT tanaudreyr integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview
AT demaiopeternichols integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview
AT kuchenmullertanja integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview