Cargando…
Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review
BACKGROUND: Theory of Change (ToC) has become an established approach to design and evaluate interventions. While ToC should—in line with the growing international focus on evidence-informed health decision-making–consider explicit approaches to incorporate evidence, there is limited guidance on how...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9997872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36893160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282808 |
_version_ | 1784903348041809920 |
---|---|
author | Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques Setti, Cecilia Arruda, Leo Heikiti Maeda de Melo, Roberta Crevelário de Araujo, Bruna Carolina Tan, Audrey R. DeMaio, Peter Nichols Kuchenmüller, Tanja |
author_facet | Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques Setti, Cecilia Arruda, Leo Heikiti Maeda de Melo, Roberta Crevelário de Araujo, Bruna Carolina Tan, Audrey R. DeMaio, Peter Nichols Kuchenmüller, Tanja |
author_sort | Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Theory of Change (ToC) has become an established approach to design and evaluate interventions. While ToC should—in line with the growing international focus on evidence-informed health decision-making–consider explicit approaches to incorporate evidence, there is limited guidance on how this should be done. This rapid review aims to identify and synthesize the available literature on how to systematically use research evidence when developing or adapting ToCs in the health sector. METHODS: A rapid review methodology using a systematic approach, was designed. Eight electronic databases were consulted to search for peer-reviewed and gray publications detailing tools, methods, and recommendations promoting the systematic integration of research evidence in ToCs. The included studies were compared, and the findings summarized qualitatively into themes to identify key principles, stages, and procedures, guiding the systematic integration of research evidence when developing or revising a ToC. RESULTS: This review included 18 studies. The main sources from which evidence was retrieved in the ToC development process were institutional data, literature searches, and stakeholder consultation. There was a variety of ways of finding and using evidence in ToC. Firstly, the review provided an overview of existing definitions of ToC, methods applied in ToC development and the related ToC stages. Secondly, a typology of 7 stages relevant for evidence integration into ToCs was developed, outlining the types of evidence and research methods the included studies applied for each of the proposed stages. CONCLUSION: This rapid review adds to the existing literature in two ways. First, it provides an up-to-date and comprehensive review of the existing methods for incorporating evidence into ToC development in the health sector. Second, it offers a new typology guiding any future endeavors of incorporating evidence into ToCs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9997872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99978722023-03-10 Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques Setti, Cecilia Arruda, Leo Heikiti Maeda de Melo, Roberta Crevelário de Araujo, Bruna Carolina Tan, Audrey R. DeMaio, Peter Nichols Kuchenmüller, Tanja PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Theory of Change (ToC) has become an established approach to design and evaluate interventions. While ToC should—in line with the growing international focus on evidence-informed health decision-making–consider explicit approaches to incorporate evidence, there is limited guidance on how this should be done. This rapid review aims to identify and synthesize the available literature on how to systematically use research evidence when developing or adapting ToCs in the health sector. METHODS: A rapid review methodology using a systematic approach, was designed. Eight electronic databases were consulted to search for peer-reviewed and gray publications detailing tools, methods, and recommendations promoting the systematic integration of research evidence in ToCs. The included studies were compared, and the findings summarized qualitatively into themes to identify key principles, stages, and procedures, guiding the systematic integration of research evidence when developing or revising a ToC. RESULTS: This review included 18 studies. The main sources from which evidence was retrieved in the ToC development process were institutional data, literature searches, and stakeholder consultation. There was a variety of ways of finding and using evidence in ToC. Firstly, the review provided an overview of existing definitions of ToC, methods applied in ToC development and the related ToC stages. Secondly, a typology of 7 stages relevant for evidence integration into ToCs was developed, outlining the types of evidence and research methods the included studies applied for each of the proposed stages. CONCLUSION: This rapid review adds to the existing literature in two ways. First, it provides an up-to-date and comprehensive review of the existing methods for incorporating evidence into ToC development in the health sector. Second, it offers a new typology guiding any future endeavors of incorporating evidence into ToCs. Public Library of Science 2023-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9997872/ /pubmed/36893160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282808 Text en © 2023 Romão et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Romão, Davi Mamblona Marques Setti, Cecilia Arruda, Leo Heikiti Maeda de Melo, Roberta Crevelário de Araujo, Bruna Carolina Tan, Audrey R. DeMaio, Peter Nichols Kuchenmüller, Tanja Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review |
title | Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review |
title_full | Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review |
title_fullStr | Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review |
title_short | Integration of evidence into Theory of Change frameworks in the healthcare sector: A rapid systematic review |
title_sort | integration of evidence into theory of change frameworks in the healthcare sector: a rapid systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9997872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36893160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282808 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romaodavimamblonamarques integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview AT setticecilia integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview AT arrudaleoheikitimaeda integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview AT demelorobertacrevelario integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview AT dearaujobrunacarolina integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview AT tanaudreyr integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview AT demaiopeternichols integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview AT kuchenmullertanja integrationofevidenceintotheoryofchangeframeworksinthehealthcaresectorarapidsystematicreview |