Cargando…

Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) has emerged as a novel surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Current research regarding the benefits of RSSH compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for these indications has been inconc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnittka, Emma, Lanpher, Nick W, Cushing-murray, Jessica, Decker, Trevor, Patel, Praful G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909114
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34702
_version_ 1784903400751628288
author Schnittka, Emma
Lanpher, Nick W
Cushing-murray, Jessica
Decker, Trevor
Patel, Praful G
author_facet Schnittka, Emma
Lanpher, Nick W
Cushing-murray, Jessica
Decker, Trevor
Patel, Praful G
author_sort Schnittka, Emma
collection PubMed
description Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) has emerged as a novel surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Current research regarding the benefits of RSSH compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for these indications has been inconclusive. Our team sought to compare surgical outcomes between these two approaches of robotic hysterectomy via systematic review and meta-analysis to ensure optimal surgical practices. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Checklist guided our review. MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched, yielding 59 results. Articles were filtered by title and abstract and then reviewed in full for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria required that (1) studies compared outcomes for RSSH and RMPH, (2) hysterectomy was indicated for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia with atypia, and (3) studies were available in English. Excluded studies (1) compared single-site and multiport laparoscopic approaches, (2) compared robotic approaches to laparoscopic or abdominal (open) techniques, and (3) employed hysterectomy for benign conditions. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger Regression Correlation analysis. Four studies complied with the selection criteria, comprising 138 patients in the RSSH group and 259 in the RMPH group. Similar outcomes were noted across all measures, including conversion rate (relative risk [RR] = 1.84 and confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-3.43), blood loss (Cohen’s d = 1.05 and Z = 18.62), operating time (Cohen’s d = 0.29 and Z = 4.38), and length of hospital stay (Cohen’s d = 1.06 and Z = 3.86). Publication bias was deemed minimal as indicated by Egger regression values of less than 0.05. These findings suggest that either a surgical approach or AEH with the proper standard of care can provide patients with endometrial cancer. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9998109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99981092023-03-10 Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Schnittka, Emma Lanpher, Nick W Cushing-murray, Jessica Decker, Trevor Patel, Praful G Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) has emerged as a novel surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Current research regarding the benefits of RSSH compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for these indications has been inconclusive. Our team sought to compare surgical outcomes between these two approaches of robotic hysterectomy via systematic review and meta-analysis to ensure optimal surgical practices. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Checklist guided our review. MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched, yielding 59 results. Articles were filtered by title and abstract and then reviewed in full for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria required that (1) studies compared outcomes for RSSH and RMPH, (2) hysterectomy was indicated for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia with atypia, and (3) studies were available in English. Excluded studies (1) compared single-site and multiport laparoscopic approaches, (2) compared robotic approaches to laparoscopic or abdominal (open) techniques, and (3) employed hysterectomy for benign conditions. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger Regression Correlation analysis. Four studies complied with the selection criteria, comprising 138 patients in the RSSH group and 259 in the RMPH group. Similar outcomes were noted across all measures, including conversion rate (relative risk [RR] = 1.84 and confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-3.43), blood loss (Cohen’s d = 1.05 and Z = 18.62), operating time (Cohen’s d = 0.29 and Z = 4.38), and length of hospital stay (Cohen’s d = 1.06 and Z = 3.86). Publication bias was deemed minimal as indicated by Egger regression values of less than 0.05. These findings suggest that either a surgical approach or AEH with the proper standard of care can provide patients with endometrial cancer.  Cureus 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9998109/ /pubmed/36909114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34702 Text en Copyright © 2023, Schnittka et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Obstetrics/Gynecology
Schnittka, Emma
Lanpher, Nick W
Cushing-murray, Jessica
Decker, Trevor
Patel, Praful G
Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort surgical outcomes following robotic single-site versus multiport hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Obstetrics/Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909114
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34702
work_keys_str_mv AT schnittkaemma surgicaloutcomesfollowingroboticsinglesiteversusmultiporthysterectomyfortreatmentofendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lanphernickw surgicaloutcomesfollowingroboticsinglesiteversusmultiporthysterectomyfortreatmentofendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cushingmurrayjessica surgicaloutcomesfollowingroboticsinglesiteversusmultiporthysterectomyfortreatmentofendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT deckertrevor surgicaloutcomesfollowingroboticsinglesiteversusmultiporthysterectomyfortreatmentofendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT patelprafulg surgicaloutcomesfollowingroboticsinglesiteversusmultiporthysterectomyfortreatmentofendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis