Cargando…
Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) has emerged as a novel surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Current research regarding the benefits of RSSH compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for these indications has been inconc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34702 |
_version_ | 1784903400751628288 |
---|---|
author | Schnittka, Emma Lanpher, Nick W Cushing-murray, Jessica Decker, Trevor Patel, Praful G |
author_facet | Schnittka, Emma Lanpher, Nick W Cushing-murray, Jessica Decker, Trevor Patel, Praful G |
author_sort | Schnittka, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) has emerged as a novel surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Current research regarding the benefits of RSSH compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for these indications has been inconclusive. Our team sought to compare surgical outcomes between these two approaches of robotic hysterectomy via systematic review and meta-analysis to ensure optimal surgical practices. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Checklist guided our review. MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched, yielding 59 results. Articles were filtered by title and abstract and then reviewed in full for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria required that (1) studies compared outcomes for RSSH and RMPH, (2) hysterectomy was indicated for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia with atypia, and (3) studies were available in English. Excluded studies (1) compared single-site and multiport laparoscopic approaches, (2) compared robotic approaches to laparoscopic or abdominal (open) techniques, and (3) employed hysterectomy for benign conditions. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger Regression Correlation analysis. Four studies complied with the selection criteria, comprising 138 patients in the RSSH group and 259 in the RMPH group. Similar outcomes were noted across all measures, including conversion rate (relative risk [RR] = 1.84 and confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-3.43), blood loss (Cohen’s d = 1.05 and Z = 18.62), operating time (Cohen’s d = 0.29 and Z = 4.38), and length of hospital stay (Cohen’s d = 1.06 and Z = 3.86). Publication bias was deemed minimal as indicated by Egger regression values of less than 0.05. These findings suggest that either a surgical approach or AEH with the proper standard of care can provide patients with endometrial cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9998109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99981092023-03-10 Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Schnittka, Emma Lanpher, Nick W Cushing-murray, Jessica Decker, Trevor Patel, Praful G Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology Robotic single-site hysterectomy (RSSH) has emerged as a novel surgical approach for the treatment of endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). Current research regarding the benefits of RSSH compared to robotic multiport hysterectomy (RMPH) for these indications has been inconclusive. Our team sought to compare surgical outcomes between these two approaches of robotic hysterectomy via systematic review and meta-analysis to ensure optimal surgical practices. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Checklist guided our review. MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were searched, yielding 59 results. Articles were filtered by title and abstract and then reviewed in full for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria required that (1) studies compared outcomes for RSSH and RMPH, (2) hysterectomy was indicated for endometrial cancer or hyperplasia with atypia, and (3) studies were available in English. Excluded studies (1) compared single-site and multiport laparoscopic approaches, (2) compared robotic approaches to laparoscopic or abdominal (open) techniques, and (3) employed hysterectomy for benign conditions. Publication bias was assessed using the Egger Regression Correlation analysis. Four studies complied with the selection criteria, comprising 138 patients in the RSSH group and 259 in the RMPH group. Similar outcomes were noted across all measures, including conversion rate (relative risk [RR] = 1.84 and confidence interval [CI] = 0.99-3.43), blood loss (Cohen’s d = 1.05 and Z = 18.62), operating time (Cohen’s d = 0.29 and Z = 4.38), and length of hospital stay (Cohen’s d = 1.06 and Z = 3.86). Publication bias was deemed minimal as indicated by Egger regression values of less than 0.05. These findings suggest that either a surgical approach or AEH with the proper standard of care can provide patients with endometrial cancer. Cureus 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9998109/ /pubmed/36909114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34702 Text en Copyright © 2023, Schnittka et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics/Gynecology Schnittka, Emma Lanpher, Nick W Cushing-murray, Jessica Decker, Trevor Patel, Praful G Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic Single-Site Versus Multiport Hysterectomy for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | surgical outcomes following robotic single-site versus multiport hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Obstetrics/Gynecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36909114 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnittkaemma surgicaloutcomesfollowingroboticsinglesiteversusmultiporthysterectomyfortreatmentofendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lanphernickw surgicaloutcomesfollowingroboticsinglesiteversusmultiporthysterectomyfortreatmentofendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cushingmurrayjessica surgicaloutcomesfollowingroboticsinglesiteversusmultiporthysterectomyfortreatmentofendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT deckertrevor surgicaloutcomesfollowingroboticsinglesiteversusmultiporthysterectomyfortreatmentofendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT patelprafulg surgicaloutcomesfollowingroboticsinglesiteversusmultiporthysterectomyfortreatmentofendometrialcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |