Cargando…

Effectiveness of implantable loop recorder and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND: Patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, the exact underlying mechanisms of SCD in PPCM remain unknown. By means of extended electrocardiographic monitoring, we aimed to systematically characterize the burden of arrhythm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoevelmann, Julian, Sliwa, Karen, Briton, Olivia, Ntsekhe, Mpiko, Chin, Ashley, Viljoen, Charle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36131137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02101-3
_version_ 1784903451699838976
author Hoevelmann, Julian
Sliwa, Karen
Briton, Olivia
Ntsekhe, Mpiko
Chin, Ashley
Viljoen, Charle
author_facet Hoevelmann, Julian
Sliwa, Karen
Briton, Olivia
Ntsekhe, Mpiko
Chin, Ashley
Viljoen, Charle
author_sort Hoevelmann, Julian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, the exact underlying mechanisms of SCD in PPCM remain unknown. By means of extended electrocardiographic monitoring, we aimed to systematically characterize the burden of arrhythmias occurring in patients with newly diagnosed PPCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five consecutive women with PPCM were included in this single-centre, prospective clinical trial and randomised to receiving either 24 h-Holter ECG monitoring followed by implantable loop recorder implantation (ILR; REVEAL XT, Medtronic(®)) or 24 h-Holter ECG monitoring alone. ILR + 24 h-Holter monitoring had a higher yield of arrhythmic events compared to 24 h-Holter monitoring alone (40% vs 6.7%, p = 0.041). Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) occurred in four patients (16%, in three patients detected by 24 h-Holter, and multiple episodes detected by ILR in one patient). One patient deceased from third-degree AV block with an escape rhythm that failed. All arrhythmic events occurred in patients with a severely impaired LV systolic function. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high prevalence of potentially life-threatening arrhythmic events in patients with newly diagnosed PPCM. These included both brady- and tachyarrhythmias. Our results highlight the importance of extended electrocardiographic monitoring, especially in those with severely impaired LV systolic function. In this regard, ILR in addition to 24 h-Holter monitoring had a higher yield of VAs as compared to 24 h-Holter monitoring alone. In settings where WCDs are not readily available, ILR monitoring should be considered in patients with severely impaired LV systolic dysfunction, especially after uneventful 24 h-Holter monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry: PACTR202104866174807. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: Extended electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in PPCM. (CHB, complete heart block/third degree AV block; ECG, electrocardiogram; ILR, implantable loop recorder; NSVT, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; PPCM, peripartum cardiomyopathy) [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02101-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9998321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99983212023-03-11 Effectiveness of implantable loop recorder and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy Hoevelmann, Julian Sliwa, Karen Briton, Olivia Ntsekhe, Mpiko Chin, Ashley Viljoen, Charle Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, the exact underlying mechanisms of SCD in PPCM remain unknown. By means of extended electrocardiographic monitoring, we aimed to systematically characterize the burden of arrhythmias occurring in patients with newly diagnosed PPCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five consecutive women with PPCM were included in this single-centre, prospective clinical trial and randomised to receiving either 24 h-Holter ECG monitoring followed by implantable loop recorder implantation (ILR; REVEAL XT, Medtronic(®)) or 24 h-Holter ECG monitoring alone. ILR + 24 h-Holter monitoring had a higher yield of arrhythmic events compared to 24 h-Holter monitoring alone (40% vs 6.7%, p = 0.041). Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) occurred in four patients (16%, in three patients detected by 24 h-Holter, and multiple episodes detected by ILR in one patient). One patient deceased from third-degree AV block with an escape rhythm that failed. All arrhythmic events occurred in patients with a severely impaired LV systolic function. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high prevalence of potentially life-threatening arrhythmic events in patients with newly diagnosed PPCM. These included both brady- and tachyarrhythmias. Our results highlight the importance of extended electrocardiographic monitoring, especially in those with severely impaired LV systolic function. In this regard, ILR in addition to 24 h-Holter monitoring had a higher yield of VAs as compared to 24 h-Holter monitoring alone. In settings where WCDs are not readily available, ILR monitoring should be considered in patients with severely impaired LV systolic dysfunction, especially after uneventful 24 h-Holter monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry: PACTR202104866174807. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: Extended electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in PPCM. (CHB, complete heart block/third degree AV block; ECG, electrocardiogram; ILR, implantable loop recorder; NSVT, non-sustained ventricular tachycardia; PPCM, peripartum cardiomyopathy) [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02101-3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-22 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9998321/ /pubmed/36131137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02101-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Hoevelmann, Julian
Sliwa, Karen
Briton, Olivia
Ntsekhe, Mpiko
Chin, Ashley
Viljoen, Charle
Effectiveness of implantable loop recorder and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy
title Effectiveness of implantable loop recorder and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy
title_full Effectiveness of implantable loop recorder and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy
title_fullStr Effectiveness of implantable loop recorder and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of implantable loop recorder and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy
title_short Effectiveness of implantable loop recorder and Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy
title_sort effectiveness of implantable loop recorder and holter electrocardiographic monitoring for the detection of arrhythmias in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36131137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02101-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hoevelmannjulian effectivenessofimplantablelooprecorderandholterelectrocardiographicmonitoringforthedetectionofarrhythmiasinpatientswithperipartumcardiomyopathy
AT sliwakaren effectivenessofimplantablelooprecorderandholterelectrocardiographicmonitoringforthedetectionofarrhythmiasinpatientswithperipartumcardiomyopathy
AT britonolivia effectivenessofimplantablelooprecorderandholterelectrocardiographicmonitoringforthedetectionofarrhythmiasinpatientswithperipartumcardiomyopathy
AT ntsekhempiko effectivenessofimplantablelooprecorderandholterelectrocardiographicmonitoringforthedetectionofarrhythmiasinpatientswithperipartumcardiomyopathy
AT chinashley effectivenessofimplantablelooprecorderandholterelectrocardiographicmonitoringforthedetectionofarrhythmiasinpatientswithperipartumcardiomyopathy
AT viljoencharle effectivenessofimplantablelooprecorderandholterelectrocardiographicmonitoringforthedetectionofarrhythmiasinpatientswithperipartumcardiomyopathy