Cargando…

Towards automatic classification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Task Force Criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is diagnosed according to the Task Force Criteria (TFC) in which cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging plays an important role. Our study aims to apply an automatic deep learning-based segmentation for right and left ventri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourfiss, Mimount, Sander, Jörg, de Vos, Bob D., te Riele, Anneline S. J. M., Asselbergs, Folkert W., Išgum, Ivana, Velthuis, Birgitta K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36066609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02088-x
_version_ 1784903452451667968
author Bourfiss, Mimount
Sander, Jörg
de Vos, Bob D.
te Riele, Anneline S. J. M.
Asselbergs, Folkert W.
Išgum, Ivana
Velthuis, Birgitta K.
author_facet Bourfiss, Mimount
Sander, Jörg
de Vos, Bob D.
te Riele, Anneline S. J. M.
Asselbergs, Folkert W.
Išgum, Ivana
Velthuis, Birgitta K.
author_sort Bourfiss, Mimount
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is diagnosed according to the Task Force Criteria (TFC) in which cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging plays an important role. Our study aims to apply an automatic deep learning-based segmentation for right and left ventricular CMR assessment and evaluate this approach for classification of the CMR TFC. METHODS: We included 227 subjects suspected of ARVC who underwent CMR. Subjects were classified into (1) ARVC patients fulfilling TFC; (2) at-risk family members; and (3) controls. To perform automatic segmentation, a Bayesian Dilated Residual Neural Network was trained and tested. Performance of automatic versus manual segmentation was assessed using Dice-coefficient and Hausdorff distance. Since automatic segmentation is most challenging in basal slices, manual correction of the automatic segmentation in the most basal slice was simulated (automatic(−basal)). CMR TFC calculated using manual and automatic(−basal) segmentation were compared using Cohen’s Kappa (κ). RESULTS: Automatic segmentation was trained on CMRs of 70 subjects (39.6 ± 18.1 years, 47% female) and tested on 157 subjects (36.9 ± 17.6 years, 59% female). Dice-coefficient and Hausdorff distance showed good agreement between manual and automatic segmentations (≥ 0.89 and ≤ 10.6 mm, respectively) which further improved after simulated correction of the most basal slice (≥ 0.92 and ≤ 9.2 mm, p < 0.001). Pearson correlation of volumetric and functional CMR measurements was good to excellent (automatic (r = 0.78–0.99, p < 0.001) and automatic(−basal) (r = 0.88–0.99, p < 0.001) measurements). CMR TFC classification using automatic(−basal) segmentations was comparable to manual segmentations (κ 0.98 ± 0.02) with comparable diagnostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: Combining automatic segmentation of CMRs with correction of the most basal slice results in accurate CMR TFC classification of subjects suspected of ARVC. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02088-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9998324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99983242023-03-11 Towards automatic classification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Task Force Criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy Bourfiss, Mimount Sander, Jörg de Vos, Bob D. te Riele, Anneline S. J. M. Asselbergs, Folkert W. Išgum, Ivana Velthuis, Birgitta K. Clin Res Cardiol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is diagnosed according to the Task Force Criteria (TFC) in which cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging plays an important role. Our study aims to apply an automatic deep learning-based segmentation for right and left ventricular CMR assessment and evaluate this approach for classification of the CMR TFC. METHODS: We included 227 subjects suspected of ARVC who underwent CMR. Subjects were classified into (1) ARVC patients fulfilling TFC; (2) at-risk family members; and (3) controls. To perform automatic segmentation, a Bayesian Dilated Residual Neural Network was trained and tested. Performance of automatic versus manual segmentation was assessed using Dice-coefficient and Hausdorff distance. Since automatic segmentation is most challenging in basal slices, manual correction of the automatic segmentation in the most basal slice was simulated (automatic(−basal)). CMR TFC calculated using manual and automatic(−basal) segmentation were compared using Cohen’s Kappa (κ). RESULTS: Automatic segmentation was trained on CMRs of 70 subjects (39.6 ± 18.1 years, 47% female) and tested on 157 subjects (36.9 ± 17.6 years, 59% female). Dice-coefficient and Hausdorff distance showed good agreement between manual and automatic segmentations (≥ 0.89 and ≤ 10.6 mm, respectively) which further improved after simulated correction of the most basal slice (≥ 0.92 and ≤ 9.2 mm, p < 0.001). Pearson correlation of volumetric and functional CMR measurements was good to excellent (automatic (r = 0.78–0.99, p < 0.001) and automatic(−basal) (r = 0.88–0.99, p < 0.001) measurements). CMR TFC classification using automatic(−basal) segmentations was comparable to manual segmentations (κ 0.98 ± 0.02) with comparable diagnostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: Combining automatic segmentation of CMRs with correction of the most basal slice results in accurate CMR TFC classification of subjects suspected of ARVC. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-02088-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-06 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9998324/ /pubmed/36066609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02088-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Bourfiss, Mimount
Sander, Jörg
de Vos, Bob D.
te Riele, Anneline S. J. M.
Asselbergs, Folkert W.
Išgum, Ivana
Velthuis, Birgitta K.
Towards automatic classification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Task Force Criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
title Towards automatic classification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Task Force Criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
title_full Towards automatic classification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Task Force Criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
title_fullStr Towards automatic classification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Task Force Criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
title_full_unstemmed Towards automatic classification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Task Force Criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
title_short Towards automatic classification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance Task Force Criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
title_sort towards automatic classification of cardiovascular magnetic resonance task force criteria for diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36066609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00392-022-02088-x
work_keys_str_mv AT bourfissmimount towardsautomaticclassificationofcardiovascularmagneticresonancetaskforcecriteriafordiagnosisofarrhythmogenicrightventricularcardiomyopathy
AT sanderjorg towardsautomaticclassificationofcardiovascularmagneticresonancetaskforcecriteriafordiagnosisofarrhythmogenicrightventricularcardiomyopathy
AT devosbobd towardsautomaticclassificationofcardiovascularmagneticresonancetaskforcecriteriafordiagnosisofarrhythmogenicrightventricularcardiomyopathy
AT terieleannelinesjm towardsautomaticclassificationofcardiovascularmagneticresonancetaskforcecriteriafordiagnosisofarrhythmogenicrightventricularcardiomyopathy
AT asselbergsfolkertw towardsautomaticclassificationofcardiovascularmagneticresonancetaskforcecriteriafordiagnosisofarrhythmogenicrightventricularcardiomyopathy
AT isgumivana towardsautomaticclassificationofcardiovascularmagneticresonancetaskforcecriteriafordiagnosisofarrhythmogenicrightventricularcardiomyopathy
AT velthuisbirgittak towardsautomaticclassificationofcardiovascularmagneticresonancetaskforcecriteriafordiagnosisofarrhythmogenicrightventricularcardiomyopathy