Cargando…

Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei

Neutron-capture cross sections of neutron-rich nuclei are calculated using a Hauser–Feshbach model when direct experimental cross sections cannot be obtained. A number of codes to perform these calculations exist, and each makes different assumptions about the underlying nuclear physics. We investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lewis, R., Couture, A., Liddick, S. N., Spyrou, A., Bleuel, D. L., Campo, L. Crespo, Crider, B. P., Dombos, A. C., Guttormsen, M., Kawano, T., Larsen, A. C., Lewis, A. M., Mosby, S., Perdikakis, G., Prokop, C. J., Quinn, S. J., Renstrøm, T., Siem, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0
_version_ 1784903500119932928
author Lewis, R.
Couture, A.
Liddick, S. N.
Spyrou, A.
Bleuel, D. L.
Campo, L. Crespo
Crider, B. P.
Dombos, A. C.
Guttormsen, M.
Kawano, T.
Larsen, A. C.
Lewis, A. M.
Mosby, S.
Perdikakis, G.
Prokop, C. J.
Quinn, S. J.
Renstrøm, T.
Siem, S.
author_facet Lewis, R.
Couture, A.
Liddick, S. N.
Spyrou, A.
Bleuel, D. L.
Campo, L. Crespo
Crider, B. P.
Dombos, A. C.
Guttormsen, M.
Kawano, T.
Larsen, A. C.
Lewis, A. M.
Mosby, S.
Perdikakis, G.
Prokop, C. J.
Quinn, S. J.
Renstrøm, T.
Siem, S.
author_sort Lewis, R.
collection PubMed
description Neutron-capture cross sections of neutron-rich nuclei are calculated using a Hauser–Feshbach model when direct experimental cross sections cannot be obtained. A number of codes to perform these calculations exist, and each makes different assumptions about the underlying nuclear physics. We investigated the systematic uncertainty associated with the choice of Hauser-Feshbach code used to calculate the neutron-capture cross section of a short-lived nucleus. The neutron-capture cross section for [Formula: see text] (n,[Formula: see text] )[Formula: see text] was calculated using three Hauser-Feshbach statistical model codes: TALYS, CoH, and EMPIRE. The calculation was first performed without any changes to the default settings in each code. Then an experimentally obtained nuclear level density (NLD) and [Formula: see text] -ray strength function ([Formula: see text] ) were included. Finally, the nuclear structure information was made consistent across the codes. The neutron-capture cross sections obtained from the three codes are in good agreement after including the experimentally obtained NLD and [Formula: see text] , accounting for differences in the underlying nuclear reaction models, and enforcing consistent approximations for unknown nuclear data. It is possible to use consistent inputs and nuclear physics to reduce the differences in the calculated neutron-capture cross section from different Hauser-Feshbach codes. However, ensuring the treatment of the input of experimental data and other nuclear physics are similar across multiple codes requires a careful investigation. For this reason, more complete documentation of the inputs and physics chosen is important. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9998597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99985972023-03-11 Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei Lewis, R. Couture, A. Liddick, S. N. Spyrou, A. Bleuel, D. L. Campo, L. Crespo Crider, B. P. Dombos, A. C. Guttormsen, M. Kawano, T. Larsen, A. C. Lewis, A. M. Mosby, S. Perdikakis, G. Prokop, C. J. Quinn, S. J. Renstrøm, T. Siem, S. Eur Phys J A Hadron Nucl Regular Article - Experimental Physics Neutron-capture cross sections of neutron-rich nuclei are calculated using a Hauser–Feshbach model when direct experimental cross sections cannot be obtained. A number of codes to perform these calculations exist, and each makes different assumptions about the underlying nuclear physics. We investigated the systematic uncertainty associated with the choice of Hauser-Feshbach code used to calculate the neutron-capture cross section of a short-lived nucleus. The neutron-capture cross section for [Formula: see text] (n,[Formula: see text] )[Formula: see text] was calculated using three Hauser-Feshbach statistical model codes: TALYS, CoH, and EMPIRE. The calculation was first performed without any changes to the default settings in each code. Then an experimentally obtained nuclear level density (NLD) and [Formula: see text] -ray strength function ([Formula: see text] ) were included. Finally, the nuclear structure information was made consistent across the codes. The neutron-capture cross sections obtained from the three codes are in good agreement after including the experimentally obtained NLD and [Formula: see text] , accounting for differences in the underlying nuclear reaction models, and enforcing consistent approximations for unknown nuclear data. It is possible to use consistent inputs and nuclear physics to reduce the differences in the calculated neutron-capture cross section from different Hauser-Feshbach codes. However, ensuring the treatment of the input of experimental data and other nuclear physics are similar across multiple codes requires a careful investigation. For this reason, more complete documentation of the inputs and physics chosen is important. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9998597/ /pubmed/36915898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Regular Article - Experimental Physics
Lewis, R.
Couture, A.
Liddick, S. N.
Spyrou, A.
Bleuel, D. L.
Campo, L. Crespo
Crider, B. P.
Dombos, A. C.
Guttormsen, M.
Kawano, T.
Larsen, A. C.
Lewis, A. M.
Mosby, S.
Perdikakis, G.
Prokop, C. J.
Quinn, S. J.
Renstrøm, T.
Siem, S.
Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei
title Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei
title_full Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei
title_fullStr Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei
title_full_unstemmed Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei
title_short Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei
title_sort statistical (n,[formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei
topic Regular Article - Experimental Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lewisr statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT couturea statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT liddicksn statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT spyroua statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT bleueldl statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT campolcrespo statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT criderbp statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT dombosac statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT guttormsenm statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT kawanot statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT larsenac statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT lewisam statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT mosbys statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT perdikakisg statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT prokopcj statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT quinnsj statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT renstrømt statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei
AT siems statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei