Cargando…
Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei
Neutron-capture cross sections of neutron-rich nuclei are calculated using a Hauser–Feshbach model when direct experimental cross sections cannot be obtained. A number of codes to perform these calculations exist, and each makes different assumptions about the underlying nuclear physics. We investig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0 |
_version_ | 1784903500119932928 |
---|---|
author | Lewis, R. Couture, A. Liddick, S. N. Spyrou, A. Bleuel, D. L. Campo, L. Crespo Crider, B. P. Dombos, A. C. Guttormsen, M. Kawano, T. Larsen, A. C. Lewis, A. M. Mosby, S. Perdikakis, G. Prokop, C. J. Quinn, S. J. Renstrøm, T. Siem, S. |
author_facet | Lewis, R. Couture, A. Liddick, S. N. Spyrou, A. Bleuel, D. L. Campo, L. Crespo Crider, B. P. Dombos, A. C. Guttormsen, M. Kawano, T. Larsen, A. C. Lewis, A. M. Mosby, S. Perdikakis, G. Prokop, C. J. Quinn, S. J. Renstrøm, T. Siem, S. |
author_sort | Lewis, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neutron-capture cross sections of neutron-rich nuclei are calculated using a Hauser–Feshbach model when direct experimental cross sections cannot be obtained. A number of codes to perform these calculations exist, and each makes different assumptions about the underlying nuclear physics. We investigated the systematic uncertainty associated with the choice of Hauser-Feshbach code used to calculate the neutron-capture cross section of a short-lived nucleus. The neutron-capture cross section for [Formula: see text] (n,[Formula: see text] )[Formula: see text] was calculated using three Hauser-Feshbach statistical model codes: TALYS, CoH, and EMPIRE. The calculation was first performed without any changes to the default settings in each code. Then an experimentally obtained nuclear level density (NLD) and [Formula: see text] -ray strength function ([Formula: see text] ) were included. Finally, the nuclear structure information was made consistent across the codes. The neutron-capture cross sections obtained from the three codes are in good agreement after including the experimentally obtained NLD and [Formula: see text] , accounting for differences in the underlying nuclear reaction models, and enforcing consistent approximations for unknown nuclear data. It is possible to use consistent inputs and nuclear physics to reduce the differences in the calculated neutron-capture cross section from different Hauser-Feshbach codes. However, ensuring the treatment of the input of experimental data and other nuclear physics are similar across multiple codes requires a careful investigation. For this reason, more complete documentation of the inputs and physics chosen is important. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9998597 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99985972023-03-11 Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei Lewis, R. Couture, A. Liddick, S. N. Spyrou, A. Bleuel, D. L. Campo, L. Crespo Crider, B. P. Dombos, A. C. Guttormsen, M. Kawano, T. Larsen, A. C. Lewis, A. M. Mosby, S. Perdikakis, G. Prokop, C. J. Quinn, S. J. Renstrøm, T. Siem, S. Eur Phys J A Hadron Nucl Regular Article - Experimental Physics Neutron-capture cross sections of neutron-rich nuclei are calculated using a Hauser–Feshbach model when direct experimental cross sections cannot be obtained. A number of codes to perform these calculations exist, and each makes different assumptions about the underlying nuclear physics. We investigated the systematic uncertainty associated with the choice of Hauser-Feshbach code used to calculate the neutron-capture cross section of a short-lived nucleus. The neutron-capture cross section for [Formula: see text] (n,[Formula: see text] )[Formula: see text] was calculated using three Hauser-Feshbach statistical model codes: TALYS, CoH, and EMPIRE. The calculation was first performed without any changes to the default settings in each code. Then an experimentally obtained nuclear level density (NLD) and [Formula: see text] -ray strength function ([Formula: see text] ) were included. Finally, the nuclear structure information was made consistent across the codes. The neutron-capture cross sections obtained from the three codes are in good agreement after including the experimentally obtained NLD and [Formula: see text] , accounting for differences in the underlying nuclear reaction models, and enforcing consistent approximations for unknown nuclear data. It is possible to use consistent inputs and nuclear physics to reduce the differences in the calculated neutron-capture cross section from different Hauser-Feshbach codes. However, ensuring the treatment of the input of experimental data and other nuclear physics are similar across multiple codes requires a careful investigation. For this reason, more complete documentation of the inputs and physics chosen is important. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-09 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9998597/ /pubmed/36915898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Regular Article - Experimental Physics Lewis, R. Couture, A. Liddick, S. N. Spyrou, A. Bleuel, D. L. Campo, L. Crespo Crider, B. P. Dombos, A. C. Guttormsen, M. Kawano, T. Larsen, A. C. Lewis, A. M. Mosby, S. Perdikakis, G. Prokop, C. J. Quinn, S. J. Renstrøm, T. Siem, S. Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei |
title | Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei |
title_full | Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei |
title_fullStr | Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei |
title_short | Statistical (n,[Formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei |
title_sort | statistical (n,[formula: see text] ) cross section model comparison for short-lived nuclei |
topic | Regular Article - Experimental Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998597/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36915898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00920-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lewisr statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT couturea statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT liddicksn statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT spyroua statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT bleueldl statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT campolcrespo statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT criderbp statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT dombosac statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT guttormsenm statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT kawanot statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT larsenac statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT lewisam statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT mosbys statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT perdikakisg statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT prokopcj statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT quinnsj statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT renstrømt statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei AT siems statisticalnformulaseetextcrosssectionmodelcomparisonforshortlivednuclei |