Cargando…

A meta-analysis to observe silage microbiome differentiated by the use of inoculant and type of raw material

Silage fermentation is naturally carried out by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to mainly produce lactic acid (LA) and other organic acids as preservatives. Along with fermentation time, the growth of LAB will replace and suppress undesirable microorganisms. This meta-analysis study aimed to explore sila...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridwan, Roni, Abdelbagi, Mohammed, Sofyan, Ahmad, Fidriyanto, Rusli, Astuti, Wulansih D., Fitri, Ainissya, Sholikin, Mohammad M., Rohmatussolihat, Sarwono, Ki A., Jayanegara, Anuraga, Widyastuti, Yantyati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1063333
_version_ 1784903524421730304
author Ridwan, Roni
Abdelbagi, Mohammed
Sofyan, Ahmad
Fidriyanto, Rusli
Astuti, Wulansih D.
Fitri, Ainissya
Sholikin, Mohammad M.
Rohmatussolihat,
Sarwono, Ki A.
Jayanegara, Anuraga
Widyastuti, Yantyati
author_facet Ridwan, Roni
Abdelbagi, Mohammed
Sofyan, Ahmad
Fidriyanto, Rusli
Astuti, Wulansih D.
Fitri, Ainissya
Sholikin, Mohammad M.
Rohmatussolihat,
Sarwono, Ki A.
Jayanegara, Anuraga
Widyastuti, Yantyati
author_sort Ridwan, Roni
collection PubMed
description Silage fermentation is naturally carried out by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to mainly produce lactic acid (LA) and other organic acids as preservatives. Along with fermentation time, the growth of LAB will replace and suppress undesirable microorganisms. This meta-analysis study aimed to explore silage microbiome differentiated by LAB inoculants and type of raw materials. A total of 37 articles with 185 studies and 475 datasets were used for building up the meta-database. Data were subjected to the mixed model methodology. The parameters observed were silage quality and silage microbiome post-ensiling process. Results revealed that four bacterial genera along with Weissella dominated the post-ensiling process. The addition of lactic acid inoculants in the silage has increased the abundance of Lactobacillus spp. and decreased the Shannon index significantly. Moreover, the abundance of both L. plantarum and L. buchneri increased, and subsequently, Weissella, Pseudomonas, Proteobacteria, pH value, ammoniacal nitrogen (NH(3)-N), coliforms, and the yeasts were decreased significantly due to the addition of LAB inoculants in silage (p < 0.05). Environmental factors such as temperature affected the existence of Pseudomonas, Exiguobacterium, and Acinetobacter. However, the dry matter, LA, acetic acid (AA), the ratio of LA to AA, and the LAB population were enhanced significantly (p < 0.05). Among the LAB types, the lowest abundance of Pseudomonas was due to the LAB group, while the lowest abundance of Weissella and Proteobacteria was due to the addition of the combined LAB group. In conclusion, the addition of LAB is effectively enhancing the silage microbiome and silage quality by altering bacterial diversity and the metabolic products of the silage materials for safe preservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9998704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99987042023-03-11 A meta-analysis to observe silage microbiome differentiated by the use of inoculant and type of raw material Ridwan, Roni Abdelbagi, Mohammed Sofyan, Ahmad Fidriyanto, Rusli Astuti, Wulansih D. Fitri, Ainissya Sholikin, Mohammad M. Rohmatussolihat, Sarwono, Ki A. Jayanegara, Anuraga Widyastuti, Yantyati Front Microbiol Microbiology Silage fermentation is naturally carried out by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to mainly produce lactic acid (LA) and other organic acids as preservatives. Along with fermentation time, the growth of LAB will replace and suppress undesirable microorganisms. This meta-analysis study aimed to explore silage microbiome differentiated by LAB inoculants and type of raw materials. A total of 37 articles with 185 studies and 475 datasets were used for building up the meta-database. Data were subjected to the mixed model methodology. The parameters observed were silage quality and silage microbiome post-ensiling process. Results revealed that four bacterial genera along with Weissella dominated the post-ensiling process. The addition of lactic acid inoculants in the silage has increased the abundance of Lactobacillus spp. and decreased the Shannon index significantly. Moreover, the abundance of both L. plantarum and L. buchneri increased, and subsequently, Weissella, Pseudomonas, Proteobacteria, pH value, ammoniacal nitrogen (NH(3)-N), coliforms, and the yeasts were decreased significantly due to the addition of LAB inoculants in silage (p < 0.05). Environmental factors such as temperature affected the existence of Pseudomonas, Exiguobacterium, and Acinetobacter. However, the dry matter, LA, acetic acid (AA), the ratio of LA to AA, and the LAB population were enhanced significantly (p < 0.05). Among the LAB types, the lowest abundance of Pseudomonas was due to the LAB group, while the lowest abundance of Weissella and Proteobacteria was due to the addition of the combined LAB group. In conclusion, the addition of LAB is effectively enhancing the silage microbiome and silage quality by altering bacterial diversity and the metabolic products of the silage materials for safe preservation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9998704/ /pubmed/36910222 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1063333 Text en Copyright © 2023 Ridwan, Abdelbagi, Sofyan, Fidriyanto, Astuti, Fitri, Sholikin, Rohmatussolihat, Sarwono, Jayanegara and Widyastuti. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Ridwan, Roni
Abdelbagi, Mohammed
Sofyan, Ahmad
Fidriyanto, Rusli
Astuti, Wulansih D.
Fitri, Ainissya
Sholikin, Mohammad M.
Rohmatussolihat,
Sarwono, Ki A.
Jayanegara, Anuraga
Widyastuti, Yantyati
A meta-analysis to observe silage microbiome differentiated by the use of inoculant and type of raw material
title A meta-analysis to observe silage microbiome differentiated by the use of inoculant and type of raw material
title_full A meta-analysis to observe silage microbiome differentiated by the use of inoculant and type of raw material
title_fullStr A meta-analysis to observe silage microbiome differentiated by the use of inoculant and type of raw material
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis to observe silage microbiome differentiated by the use of inoculant and type of raw material
title_short A meta-analysis to observe silage microbiome differentiated by the use of inoculant and type of raw material
title_sort meta-analysis to observe silage microbiome differentiated by the use of inoculant and type of raw material
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9998704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36910222
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1063333
work_keys_str_mv AT ridwanroni ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT abdelbagimohammed ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT sofyanahmad ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT fidriyantorusli ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT astutiwulansihd ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT fitriainissya ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT sholikinmohammadm ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT rohmatussolihat ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT sarwonokia ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT jayanegaraanuraga ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT widyastutiyantyati ametaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT ridwanroni metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT abdelbagimohammed metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT sofyanahmad metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT fidriyantorusli metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT astutiwulansihd metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT fitriainissya metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT sholikinmohammadm metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT rohmatussolihat metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT sarwonokia metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT jayanegaraanuraga metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial
AT widyastutiyantyati metaanalysistoobservesilagemicrobiomedifferentiatedbytheuseofinoculantandtypeofrawmaterial