Cargando…

A parasitic nematode induces dysbiosis in susceptible but not resistant gastropod hosts

Animals’ gut microbiomes affect a wide array of biological processes including immunity and protection from pathogens. However, how the microbiome changes due to infection by parasites is still largely unknown, as is how the microbiome changes in hosts that differ in their susceptibility to parasite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheehy, Laura, MacDonald‐Howard, Kerry, Williams, Chris D., Weedall, Gareth D., Jones, Hayley, Rae, Robbie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37186232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1346
_version_ 1784903666707202048
author Sheehy, Laura
MacDonald‐Howard, Kerry
Williams, Chris D.
Weedall, Gareth D.
Jones, Hayley
Rae, Robbie
author_facet Sheehy, Laura
MacDonald‐Howard, Kerry
Williams, Chris D.
Weedall, Gareth D.
Jones, Hayley
Rae, Robbie
author_sort Sheehy, Laura
collection PubMed
description Animals’ gut microbiomes affect a wide array of biological processes including immunity and protection from pathogens. However, how the microbiome changes due to infection by parasites is still largely unknown, as is how the microbiome changes in hosts that differ in their susceptibility to parasites. To investigate this, we exposed two slug species of differing susceptibility to the parasitic nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita (Deroceras reticulatum is highly susceptible and Ambigolimax valentianus resistant to the nematode) and profiled the gut microbiota after 7 and 14 days. Before infection, both slug species’ microbiota was dominated by similar bacterial genera: Pseudomonas (by far the most abundant), Sphingobacterium, Pedobacter, Chryseobacterium, and Flavobacterium. In the resistant host A. valentianus, there was no significant change in the bacterial genera after infection, but in D. reticulatum, the bacterial profile changed, with a decrease in the abundance of Pseudomonadaceae and an increase in the abundance of Flavobacteriaceae and Sphingobacteriaceae after 7 days postinfection. This suggests nematode infection causes dysbiosis in hosts that are susceptible to infection, but the microbiome of resistant species remains unaltered. In summary, the regulation of the immune system is tightly linked with host survival, and nematode infection can alter the microbiome structure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9999464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99994642023-03-11 A parasitic nematode induces dysbiosis in susceptible but not resistant gastropod hosts Sheehy, Laura MacDonald‐Howard, Kerry Williams, Chris D. Weedall, Gareth D. Jones, Hayley Rae, Robbie Microbiologyopen Original Articles Animals’ gut microbiomes affect a wide array of biological processes including immunity and protection from pathogens. However, how the microbiome changes due to infection by parasites is still largely unknown, as is how the microbiome changes in hosts that differ in their susceptibility to parasites. To investigate this, we exposed two slug species of differing susceptibility to the parasitic nematode Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita (Deroceras reticulatum is highly susceptible and Ambigolimax valentianus resistant to the nematode) and profiled the gut microbiota after 7 and 14 days. Before infection, both slug species’ microbiota was dominated by similar bacterial genera: Pseudomonas (by far the most abundant), Sphingobacterium, Pedobacter, Chryseobacterium, and Flavobacterium. In the resistant host A. valentianus, there was no significant change in the bacterial genera after infection, but in D. reticulatum, the bacterial profile changed, with a decrease in the abundance of Pseudomonadaceae and an increase in the abundance of Flavobacteriaceae and Sphingobacteriaceae after 7 days postinfection. This suggests nematode infection causes dysbiosis in hosts that are susceptible to infection, but the microbiome of resistant species remains unaltered. In summary, the regulation of the immune system is tightly linked with host survival, and nematode infection can alter the microbiome structure. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9999464/ /pubmed/37186232 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1346 Text en © 2023 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sheehy, Laura
MacDonald‐Howard, Kerry
Williams, Chris D.
Weedall, Gareth D.
Jones, Hayley
Rae, Robbie
A parasitic nematode induces dysbiosis in susceptible but not resistant gastropod hosts
title A parasitic nematode induces dysbiosis in susceptible but not resistant gastropod hosts
title_full A parasitic nematode induces dysbiosis in susceptible but not resistant gastropod hosts
title_fullStr A parasitic nematode induces dysbiosis in susceptible but not resistant gastropod hosts
title_full_unstemmed A parasitic nematode induces dysbiosis in susceptible but not resistant gastropod hosts
title_short A parasitic nematode induces dysbiosis in susceptible but not resistant gastropod hosts
title_sort parasitic nematode induces dysbiosis in susceptible but not resistant gastropod hosts
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37186232
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1346
work_keys_str_mv AT sheehylaura aparasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT macdonaldhowardkerry aparasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT williamschrisd aparasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT weedallgarethd aparasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT joneshayley aparasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT raerobbie aparasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT sheehylaura parasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT macdonaldhowardkerry parasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT williamschrisd parasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT weedallgarethd parasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT joneshayley parasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts
AT raerobbie parasiticnematodeinducesdysbiosisinsusceptiblebutnotresistantgastropodhosts