Cargando…
Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Anastomosis for gastrointestinal reconstruction has been contentious after low anterior resection of rectal cancer for the past 30 years. Despite the abundance of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on colon J-pouch (CJP), straight colorectal anastomosis (SCA), transverse coloplast (TCP)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02977-z |
_version_ | 1784903693394509824 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Huabing Xiong, Ming Zeng, Yu Shi, Yabo Pei, Zhihui Liao, Chuanwen |
author_facet | Liu, Huabing Xiong, Ming Zeng, Yu Shi, Yabo Pei, Zhihui Liao, Chuanwen |
author_sort | Liu, Huabing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anastomosis for gastrointestinal reconstruction has been contentious after low anterior resection of rectal cancer for the past 30 years. Despite the abundance of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on colon J-pouch (CJP), straight colorectal anastomosis (SCA), transverse coloplast (TCP), and side-to-end anastomosis (SEA), most studies are small and lack reliable clinical evidence. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of the four anastomoses on postoperative complications, bowel function, and quality of life in rectal cancer. METHODS: We assessed the safety and efficacy of CJP, SCA, TCP, and SEA in adult patients with rectal cancer after surgery by searching the Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases to collect RCTs from the date of establishment to May 20, 2022. Anastomotic leakage and defecation frequency were the main outcome indicators. We pooled data through a random effects model in a Bayesian framework and assessed model inconsistency using the deviance information criterion (DIC) and node-splitting method and inter-study heterogeneity using the I-squared statistics (I(2)). The interventions were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to compare each outcome indicator. RESULTS: Of the 474 studies initially evaluated, 29 were eligible RCTs comprising 2631 patients. Among the four anastomoses, the SEA group had the lowest incidence of anastomotic leakage, ranking first (SUCRA(SEA) = 0.982), followed by the CJP group (SUCRA(CJP) = 0.628). The defecation frequency in the SEA group was comparable to those in the CJP and TCP groups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. In comparison, the defecation frequency in the SCA group 12 months after surgery all ranked fourth. No statistically significant differences were found among the four anastomoses in terms of anastomotic stricture, reoperation, postoperative mortality within 30 days, fecal urgency, incomplete defecation, use of antidiarrheal medication, or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that SEA had the lowest risk of complications, comparable bowel function, and quality of life compared to the CJP and TCP, but further research is required to determine its long-term consequences. Furthermore, we should be aware that SCA is associated with a high defecation frequency. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-02977-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9999608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99996082023-03-11 Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Liu, Huabing Xiong, Ming Zeng, Yu Shi, Yabo Pei, Zhihui Liao, Chuanwen World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Anastomosis for gastrointestinal reconstruction has been contentious after low anterior resection of rectal cancer for the past 30 years. Despite the abundance of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on colon J-pouch (CJP), straight colorectal anastomosis (SCA), transverse coloplast (TCP), and side-to-end anastomosis (SEA), most studies are small and lack reliable clinical evidence. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of the four anastomoses on postoperative complications, bowel function, and quality of life in rectal cancer. METHODS: We assessed the safety and efficacy of CJP, SCA, TCP, and SEA in adult patients with rectal cancer after surgery by searching the Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed databases to collect RCTs from the date of establishment to May 20, 2022. Anastomotic leakage and defecation frequency were the main outcome indicators. We pooled data through a random effects model in a Bayesian framework and assessed model inconsistency using the deviance information criterion (DIC) and node-splitting method and inter-study heterogeneity using the I-squared statistics (I(2)). The interventions were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to compare each outcome indicator. RESULTS: Of the 474 studies initially evaluated, 29 were eligible RCTs comprising 2631 patients. Among the four anastomoses, the SEA group had the lowest incidence of anastomotic leakage, ranking first (SUCRA(SEA) = 0.982), followed by the CJP group (SUCRA(CJP) = 0.628). The defecation frequency in the SEA group was comparable to those in the CJP and TCP groups at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. In comparison, the defecation frequency in the SCA group 12 months after surgery all ranked fourth. No statistically significant differences were found among the four anastomoses in terms of anastomotic stricture, reoperation, postoperative mortality within 30 days, fecal urgency, incomplete defecation, use of antidiarrheal medication, or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that SEA had the lowest risk of complications, comparable bowel function, and quality of life compared to the CJP and TCP, but further research is required to determine its long-term consequences. Furthermore, we should be aware that SCA is associated with a high defecation frequency. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-023-02977-z. BioMed Central 2023-03-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9999608/ /pubmed/36899350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02977-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Liu, Huabing Xiong, Ming Zeng, Yu Shi, Yabo Pei, Zhihui Liao, Chuanwen Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36899350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02977-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuhuabing comparisonofcomplicationsandbowelfunctionamongdifferentreconstructiontechniquesafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xiongming comparisonofcomplicationsandbowelfunctionamongdifferentreconstructiontechniquesafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT zengyu comparisonofcomplicationsandbowelfunctionamongdifferentreconstructiontechniquesafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT shiyabo comparisonofcomplicationsandbowelfunctionamongdifferentreconstructiontechniquesafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT peizhihui comparisonofcomplicationsandbowelfunctionamongdifferentreconstructiontechniquesafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT liaochuanwen comparisonofcomplicationsandbowelfunctionamongdifferentreconstructiontechniquesafterlowanteriorresectionforrectalcancerasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |