Cargando…
Effectiveness and Safety of Acupotomy on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pragmatic, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE: In Korea, complex treatments such as acupotomy, acupuncture, and physical therapy are performed for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Although there are reports of acupotomy as monotherapy or acupuncture treatment for LSS, pragmatic studies are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to determine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908927 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S399132 |
_version_ | 1784903717922799616 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jung Hee Lee, Hyun-Jong Woo, Sang Ha Park, Yu-Kyeong Han, Ji Hoon Choi, Ga-Young Heo, Eun Sil Kim, Jae Soo Park, Chung A Lee, Woo Dong Yang, Chang Sop Kim, Ae-Ran Han, Chang-Hyun |
author_facet | Lee, Jung Hee Lee, Hyun-Jong Woo, Sang Ha Park, Yu-Kyeong Han, Ji Hoon Choi, Ga-Young Heo, Eun Sil Kim, Jae Soo Park, Chung A Lee, Woo Dong Yang, Chang Sop Kim, Ae-Ran Han, Chang-Hyun |
author_sort | Lee, Jung Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: In Korea, complex treatments such as acupotomy, acupuncture, and physical therapy are performed for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Although there are reports of acupotomy as monotherapy or acupuncture treatment for LSS, pragmatic studies are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy for LSS to provide baseline evidence for a large-scale study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This pragmatic randomized controlled pilot study enrolled 34 participants and randomly assigned them to two groups (n=17/group). The intervention was conducted for 8 weeks. Acupotomy plus and usual care groups received acupuncture (17 acupoints) and interferential current therapy (ICT) twice weekly; however, the acupotomy plus group received an additional acupotomy (7 acupoints) for treatment of the usual care group. The primary outcome was measured using visual analog scales (VAS), and secondary outcomes were assessed using the self-rated walking distance, short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Outcome measurements were conducted at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the commencement of the intervention. Adverse events were assessed at each visit. Hematological and biochemical examinations were performed at screening and week 8. RESULTS: Overall, 33 of the 34 participants completed the study, and one participant in the usual care group dropped out. In both groups, VAS scores at weeks 4, 8, and 12 significantly improved compared to baseline. Also, self-rated walking distance, SF-MPQ, and ODI scores were significantly improved at weeks 4, 8, and 12 than at baseline. However, there were no significant differences in the time-dependent and group-to-time interactions between the two groups. In addition, no severe adverse reactions were reported, and there were no significant differences in hematological and biochemical results. CONCLUSION: This study provides baseline data for large-scale studies on the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy in LSS. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: KCT0006234. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9999720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99997202023-03-11 Effectiveness and Safety of Acupotomy on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pragmatic, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial Lee, Jung Hee Lee, Hyun-Jong Woo, Sang Ha Park, Yu-Kyeong Han, Ji Hoon Choi, Ga-Young Heo, Eun Sil Kim, Jae Soo Park, Chung A Lee, Woo Dong Yang, Chang Sop Kim, Ae-Ran Han, Chang-Hyun J Pain Res Clinical Trial Report PURPOSE: In Korea, complex treatments such as acupotomy, acupuncture, and physical therapy are performed for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Although there are reports of acupotomy as monotherapy or acupuncture treatment for LSS, pragmatic studies are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy for LSS to provide baseline evidence for a large-scale study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This pragmatic randomized controlled pilot study enrolled 34 participants and randomly assigned them to two groups (n=17/group). The intervention was conducted for 8 weeks. Acupotomy plus and usual care groups received acupuncture (17 acupoints) and interferential current therapy (ICT) twice weekly; however, the acupotomy plus group received an additional acupotomy (7 acupoints) for treatment of the usual care group. The primary outcome was measured using visual analog scales (VAS), and secondary outcomes were assessed using the self-rated walking distance, short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Outcome measurements were conducted at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the commencement of the intervention. Adverse events were assessed at each visit. Hematological and biochemical examinations were performed at screening and week 8. RESULTS: Overall, 33 of the 34 participants completed the study, and one participant in the usual care group dropped out. In both groups, VAS scores at weeks 4, 8, and 12 significantly improved compared to baseline. Also, self-rated walking distance, SF-MPQ, and ODI scores were significantly improved at weeks 4, 8, and 12 than at baseline. However, there were no significant differences in the time-dependent and group-to-time interactions between the two groups. In addition, no severe adverse reactions were reported, and there were no significant differences in hematological and biochemical results. CONCLUSION: This study provides baseline data for large-scale studies on the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy in LSS. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: KCT0006234. Dove 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9999720/ /pubmed/36908927 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S399132 Text en © 2023 Lee et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trial Report Lee, Jung Hee Lee, Hyun-Jong Woo, Sang Ha Park, Yu-Kyeong Han, Ji Hoon Choi, Ga-Young Heo, Eun Sil Kim, Jae Soo Park, Chung A Lee, Woo Dong Yang, Chang Sop Kim, Ae-Ran Han, Chang-Hyun Effectiveness and Safety of Acupotomy on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pragmatic, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Effectiveness and Safety of Acupotomy on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pragmatic, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Effectiveness and Safety of Acupotomy on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pragmatic, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness and Safety of Acupotomy on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pragmatic, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness and Safety of Acupotomy on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pragmatic, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Effectiveness and Safety of Acupotomy on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pragmatic, Pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effectiveness and safety of acupotomy on lumbar spinal stenosis: a pragmatic, pilot, randomized controlled trial |
topic | Clinical Trial Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999720/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36908927 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S399132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejunghee effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leehyunjong effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT woosangha effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parkyukyeong effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hanjihoon effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choigayoung effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT heoeunsil effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kimjaesoo effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parkchunga effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leewoodong effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yangchangsop effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kimaeran effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hanchanghyun effectivenessandsafetyofacupotomyonlumbarspinalstenosisapragmaticpilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial |