por
Chen, Chunlin,
Wang, Wuliang,
Liu, Ping,
Li, Pengfei,
Wang, Lu,
Jin, Shuangling,
Bin, Xiaonong,
Lang, Jinghe
Publicado 2019
“…Subsequently, 1799 cases from each group were matched and the type C2 group had a lower 5-year DFS (84.6 vs 88.4%, hazard ratio:
1.332). Upon further analysis of the subgroups, the type C2 group had a lower 5-year OS and DFS (OS: 90.3 vs 93.8%, hazard ratio: 1.522; DFS: 85.2 vs 89.4%, hazard ratio: 1.439). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online
Artículo
Texto
