“…Data extraction will be guided by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. RESULTS: The results presented will be examined using a narrative synthesis approach. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The results were systematically examined, and the quality assessed by two reviewers using a modified Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…These recommendations can be used in addition to other, more general, recommendations, such as the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) or the reference case for economic evaluation by the international decision support initiative.…”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was used to assess quality of reporting. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…We extracted data items guided by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. We collected qualitative and quantitative data which we analysed in Microsoft Excel and R software. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The quality of economic studies was assessed using the CHEERS (2022) 28-point checklist. A total of 17 studies met our eligibility criteria. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Data extraction from the articles included in the review was guided by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist, and the quality of the included economic evaluations was assessed using the Quality of Health Economics Studies Instrument (QHES). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Included studies were appraised for reporting quality using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. RESULTS: We identified 50 records representing 46 economic evaluations for a variety of interventions including antibiotics (n = 5), fluid therapy (n = 2), early goal-directed therapy and other resuscitation protocols (n = 8), immunoglobulins (n = 2), and interventions no longer in clinical use such as monoclonal antibodies (n = 7) and drotrecogin alfa (n = 13). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Overall reporting of the identified studies largely met CHEERS recommendations. In the first-line setting, for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, pembrolizumab appeared cost-effective compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in the US and Hong Kong (China), but not in the UK and China. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was applied to assess the quality of the selected studies. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The methodological design quality was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) and the Drummond tool. We reported the systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Eligible studies were restricted to developed countries and assessed using the CHEERS, CHEC, and PHILIPS checklists. The study protocol was pre-published in PROSPERO. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Third, the medical and economic impact need to be quantified, e.g., through the measurement of quality-adjusted life years while applying the CHEERS and PRISMA reporting criteria. Conclusions: Private and public institutions can already today leverage AI implementation based on the identified results and thus drive the translation from scientific development to real world application. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The Literature was screened and extracted by two researchers independently and assessed with the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) List and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement. Results: A total of 25 studies were included in the review. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The assessment of quality was based on the protocol by the BMJ and CHEERS. PROSPERO 2020: CRD42020225757. RESULTS: No eligible study about SARS or MERS was recovered. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…We extracted study characteristics using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Finally, we summarised authors’ modelling decisions using a framework that examines how models are developed to emphasise generalisability, precision, or realism. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Risk of bias was assessed through the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs (ICROMS) and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), then analyzed narratively. RESULTS: 27 studies were included from the 5254 records. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The methodological rigorousness of studies was assessed with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2009 checklist. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The quality of each included study was evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). RESULTS: The systematic review included 7 studies. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…INTERVENTION: An evidence-based structured group educational intervention (CHEERS) using the principles of social cognitive theory to improve knowledge and self-management skills. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso