“…Studies will be critically appraised using Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement checklist. We will undertake a descriptive, narrative, and interpretative synthesis of data to address the study objectives. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Reporting quality was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standard (CHEERS) statement (a modified version with 21 items, as we focused on trial-based cost-effectiveness evaluations) and the statistical quality was assessed using a literature-based list of criteria (8 items). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Study characteristics were described, the quality of reporting and methods assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist, and study findings summarised. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight reporting guidelines, such as CONSORT, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE), Quality of Reporting of Meta-analysis (QUOROM), STAndards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy (STARD), Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE), Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) were examined. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The quality of reporting the evidence was evaluated using the CHEERS checklist and drivers of cost-effectiveness were reported. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Study and population characteristics, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), as well as total costs and benefits, will be extracted, and quality will be assessed by use of the Drummond and CHEERS checklists; context-specific issues will also be considered. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The mean percentage of applicable CHEERS criteria met by each study was 77% (median = 83%, range = 33–100%), with limited reporting of conflicts of interest. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Information on general, methodological and reproducibility items will be reported, stratified by year, citation of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement and journal. Risk ratios with 95% CIs will be calculated to represent changes in reporting between 2012–2019 and 2019–2022. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Key characteristics of eligible studies were extracted, and their quality assessed against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). Evers CHEC-List was used for full economic evaluations. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and a Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). Data were summarised and combined using random-effect meta-analysis. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Study quality was assessed using an adapted CHEERS checklist and used as weight in a random-effects meta-analysis to estimate mean cost and mean outcomes of integrated care. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Studies fully or predominantly employing micro-costing were appraised for methodological and reporting quality through economic evaluation guidelines (Evers, Drummond, Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), Fukuda and Imanaka checklists). Following the Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, micro-costing studies were defined as involving “direct enumeration and costing out of every input consumed in the treatment of a particular patient.” …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Quality evaluation will be done using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. DISCUSSION: The protocol for this systematic review is the first step to assess the cost-effectiveness of the healthcare interventions that have been described as potential treatments for post-stroke OD. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…All studies were independently screened, and data extraction and quality appraisal adhered to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist by two review authors. Data analysis was conducted by grouping studies according to their telehealth modality and payer perspective. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Quality assessment was performed using the relevant cost-specific criteria of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. To guarantee comparability, disaggregated costs data were inflated to 2019 US dollar equivalents. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…We conducted one-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. We followed the CHEERS 2022 guidelines. RESULTS: Compared to the status quo, the nine vaccination strategies would result in $3.057-33.124 million incremental cost and 94-1,211 incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) in 100,000 women previously treated for cervical precancerous lesions. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…A systematic review of studies was conducted in the first step. The CHEERS checklist was used to evaluate the quality of the studies in the systematic review. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Reporting quality of all studies was assessed using the CHEERS 2022 checklist. RESULTS: In total, 49 out of 5552 articles were included for data extraction and assessment of reporting quality, reporting on 48 unique early detection strategies. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…This economic evaluation will be reported complying with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. DISCUSSION: This within-trial economic evaluation relaying the costs and outcomes of an interdisciplinary tele-consulting intervention will provide high-quality evidence for cost-effectiveness and policy implications of a tele-neurological programme, including the potential for application in other rural areas in Germany or other jurisdictions with a comparable health system. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The Consolidated Guidelines for the Reporting of Economic Evaluations (CHEERS) 24 item check list can be used by AHRQ, NHMRC, other CPG and health organisations, in conjunction with the Drummond ten-point check list and a questionnaire that scores that checklist for grading studies, when assessing economic evidence. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso