Materias dentro de su búsqueda.
Mostrando 101 - 120 Resultados de 483 Para Buscar '"Cheers"', tiempo de consulta: 0.85s Limitar resultados
  1. 101
    por Nagirnaja, Liina, Lopes, Alexandra M., Charng, Wu-Lin, Miller, Brian, Stakaitis, Rytis, Golubickaite, Ieva, Stendahl, Alexandra, Luan, Tianpengcheng, Friedrich, Corinna, Mahyari, Eisa, Fadial, Eloise, Kasak, Laura, Vigh-Conrad, Katinka, Oud, Manon S., Xavier, Miguel J., Cheers, Samuel R., James, Emma R., Guo, Jingtao, Jenkins, Timothy G., Riera-Escamilla, Antoni, Barros, Alberto, Carvalho, Filipa, Fernandes, Susana, Gonçalves, João, Gurnett, Christina A., Jørgensen, Niels, Jezek, Davor, Jungheim, Emily S., Kliesch, Sabine, McLachlan, Robert I., Omurtag, Kenan R., Pilatz, Adrian, Sandlow, Jay I., Smith, James, Eisenberg, Michael L., Hotaling, James M., Jarvi, Keith A., Punab, Margus, Rajpert-De Meyts, Ewa, Carrell, Douglas T., Krausz, Csilla, Laan, Maris, O’Bryan, Moira K., Schlegel, Peter N., Tüttelmann, Frank, Veltman, Joris A., Almstrup, Kristian, Aston, Kenneth I., Conrad, Donald F.
    Publicado 2022
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Diverse monogenic subforms of human spermatogenic failure
  2. 102
    Publicado 1996
    Tabla de Contenidos:
    CD Audiom
    O magnum misterium a sequence of twentieth-century carols /
  3. 103
    “…In conclusion, fewer than half the studies met 80% of the CHEERS checklist criteria.…”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Economic Evaluations Informed Exclusively by Real World Data: A Systematic Review
  4. 104
    “…MAIN TEXT: The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) is a reporting guideline for authors publishing health economic evaluations. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Commentary: Advocating for patient and public involvement and engagement in health economic evaluation
  5. 105
    “…The overall mean QHES scores were found to be higher 79.06 ± 11.84, representing high quality (75–100) compared to CHEERS scores (%) 75.03 ± 11.21. The statistical pairwise comparison between CHEERS mean (75.03 ± 11.21) and QHES mean (79.06 ± 11.84) were not statistically significant (P = 0.10) whereas, QHES score showed higher means as compared to CHEERS. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Systematic evidence of health economic evaluation of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A quality appraisal
  6. 106
    “…The CHEERS statement was used to appraise the reporting quality of included TCM economic evaluations. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Reporting quality of economic evaluations of the negotiated Traditional Chinese Medicines in national reimbursement drug list of China: A systematic review
  7. 107
    “…Although we observed an overall good adherence to CHEERS recommendations, there is still room for improvement in economic evaluations reporting in this field.…”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Economic evaluations of screening strategies for the early detection of colorectal cancer in the average-risk population: A systematic literature review
  8. 108
    “…We referred the patients needing interventions to the base hospital (CHEERS) using a screening algorithm, where they received retinal laser and surgery. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    A Unique Experience of Retinal Diseases Screening in Nepal
  9. 109
    “…After quantification, the CHEERS scores and QHES scores did not differ significantly. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    A Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluation on Targeted Therapies for First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Quality Evaluation
  10. 110
    “…Then, we performed a case–control study using incorporated and not incorporated cost analyses after 1:1 matching by study subject and compared them by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement requirements and other criteria. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Adaptation of Cost Analysis Studies in Practice Guidelines
  11. 111
    “…The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist scored the reporting quality between 0 and 100. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Were economic evaluations well reported for the newly listed oncology drugs in China’s national reimbursement drug list
  12. 112
    “…We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and extracted the items from the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Results: We found thirteen articles that were of good quality according to CHEERS: six studies focused on diagnostics of Helicobacter pylori infections associated with dyspepsia and four on duodenal ulcers. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Efficiency of Diagnostic Testing for Helicobacter pylori Infections—A Systematic Review
  13. 113
    por Zhang, Junliang, Bai, Qian, Bian, Ying
    Publicado 2021
    “…After evaluation using QHES and CHEERS, antiviral TCM obtained an overall score of 41.37 ± 4.46/99 in QHES, compared with 48.89 ± 7.25/99 (18.18% higher than TCM) of antiviral non-TCM. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Quality Appraisal of the Pharmacoeconomic Research Literature about Antivirals: A Comparison between Chinese Medicine and Non-Chinese Medicine
  14. 114
    “…This material includes the full search strategy, operational definitions of the CHEERS elements, and a list of all included studies with key information.…”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Quality of cost evaluations of physician continuous professional development: Systematic review of reporting and methods
  15. 115
    “…Eight of them (61.5%) achieved a score between 17 and 23 on the CHEERS checklist. The comparison between the TDM strategy and an empirical strategy was cost saving. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Cost-Effectiveness of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Anti-TNF Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review
  16. 116
    “…RESULTS: The adapted C-BANKS 2.0 questionnaire demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.70) and construct validity with related measures CHEERS and MEQ (p < 0.05). The C-BANKS 2.0 demonstrated strong responsiveness. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Update and validation of the Canadian Behavior, Attitude and Nutrition Knowledge Survey (C-BANKS 2.0)
  17. 117
    “…Study and reporting quality were evaluated using SIGN and CHEERS checklists. All costs were adjusted to 2013 US$. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Economic Evaluation of Interventions for Prevention of Hospital Acquired Infections: A Systematic Review
  18. 118
    “…The quality of the methodological design was assessed with items regarding methodology from the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). The systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    A systematic review about costing methodology in robotic surgery: evidence for low quality in most of the studies
  19. 119
    “…All studies were of “excellent”, “very good” or “good” quality when assessed against the CHEERS checklist. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent identification of cost-effective and cost-saving interventions may help to reduce the DFU healthcare burden. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Economic evaluations considering costs and outcomes of diabetic foot ulcer infections: A systematic review
  20. 120
    “…Educators completed the CHEERS (Creating Healthy Eating and activity Environments Survey) and MEQ (Mindful Eating Questionnaire) self-audit tools while GT3X+ ActiGraph accelerometers measured preschooler PA. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    The Impact of COVID-19 on Eating Environments and Activity in Early Childhood Education and Care in Alberta, Canada: A Cross-Sectional Study
Herramientas de búsqueda: RSS