Materias dentro de su búsqueda.
Materias dentro de su búsqueda.
-
121por Casas, Carmen Phang Romero, Albuquerque, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro de, Loureiro, Rafaela Borge, Gollner, Angela Maria, Freitas, Marina Gonçalves de, Duque, Graciela Paula do Nascimento, Viscondi, Juliana Yukari Kodaira“…Report quality was assessed using the CHEERS checklist. The Dominance Matrix Ranking (DRM) was used to analyze and interpret the results. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
122por Lange, Oliver“…The mean of reported CHEERS items per study is 81% (min. 59%; max. 91%). …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
123por White, Nicole M, Carter, Hannah E, Kularatna, Sanjeewa, Borg, David N, Brain, David C, Tariq, Amina, Abell, Bridget, Blythe, Robin, McPhail, Steven M“…Individual studies were further appraised against the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation and Reporting (CHEERS) 2022 checklist. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies published since 2010 were included. …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
124por Gansen, Fabia Mareike“…Additionally, the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) were used to measure quality of reporting. …”
Publicado 2018
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
125por Gervès-Pinquié, Chloé, Girault, Anne, Phillips, Serena, Raskin, Sarah, Pratt-Chapman, Mandi“…Seven out of the nine studies included met standards for high-quality based on CHEERS criteria. Eight concluded that patient navigation programs were unequivocally cost-effective for the health outcomes of interest. …”
Publicado 2018
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
126por van Schoonhoven, Alexander V., Gout-Zwart, Judith J., de Vries, Marijke J. S., van Asselt, Antoinette D. I., Dvortsin, Evgeni, Vemer, Pepijn, van Boven, Job F. M., Postma, Maarten J.“…Finally, papers were evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS). RESULTS: Out of initially 570 papers, 36 agreed with the inclusion criteria. …”
Publicado 2019
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
127“…The completeness of reporting for the methods of each economic evaluation was appraised according to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. Six decision-analytic model-based economic evaluations were identified. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
128por Erku, Daniel, Mersha, Amanual G, Ali, Eskinder Eshetu, Gebretekle, Gebremedhin B, Wubishet, Befikadu L, Kassie, Gizat Molla, Mulugeta, Anwar, Mekonnen, Alemayehu B, Eshetie, Tesfahun C, Scuffham, Paul“…While the overall quality of included studies was judged as moderate (meeting 69% of CHEERS checklist), only four out of 27 cost-effectiveness studies characterized heterogeneity. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
129por Jahangiri, Reza, Rezapour, Aziz, Malekzadeh, Reza, Olyaeemanesh, Alireza, Roshandel, Gholamreza, Motevalian, Seyed Abbas“…Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was used to quality assessment of included studies. …”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
130por Jelušić, Aleksandra, Mitrović, Petar, Marković, Sanja, Iličić, Renata, Milovanović, Predrag, Stanković, Slaviša, Popović Milovanović, Tatjana“…The aim of this work was to identify and characterize the pectolytic bacteria responsible for the emergence of bacterial soft rot on two summer cabbage hybrids (Cheers F1 and Hippo F1) grown in the Futog locality (Bačka, Vojvodina), known for the five-century-long tradition of cabbage cultivation in Serbia. …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
131por Schuermans, Valérie N E, Droeghaag, Ruud, Hermans, Sem M M, Smeets, Anouk Y J M, Caelers, Inge J M H, Hiligsmann, Mickaël, van Hemert, Wouter L W, Evers, Silvia, van Santbrink, Henk“…PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure is a set of recommendations for the conduct and reporting, as a complement to the CHEERS 2022 checklist, of economic evaluations in spine surgery. …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
132por Edwards, Katherine, Jones, Natasha, Newton, Julia, Foster, Charlie, Judge, Andrew, Jackson, Kate, Arden, Nigel K., Pinedo-Villanueva, Rafael“…The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement was used to review the methodological quality of included economic evaluations. …”
Publicado 2017
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
133“…The quality of the studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklists. We did not elaborate the restrictions on the target population. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
134“…The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was used for methodological quality assessment. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
135“…Twelve studies were rated as good quality and one as a moderate quality based on the CHEERS checklist. Eight studies compared aprepitant plus 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3RA) and dexamethasone with the standard regimen (5-HT3RA and dexamethasone). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
136“…Reporting and quality of economic evaluations was assessed using the CHEERS guidelines and Recommendations of Second Panel for Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine, respectively. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
137“…From 24 criteria in the CHEERS checklist, all included studies could meet 21 criteria (87.5%). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
138por Goldfarb, Steven“…However, that we will always try to answer them is a forgone conclusion, as we will not survive if we don't. Cheers. Talk presented in numerous places. This version prepared for Queensland University of Technology.…”
Publicado 2022
Enlace del recurso
-
139por Izadi, Reyhane, Hatam, Nahid, Baberi, Fatemeh, Yousefzadeh, Setareh, Jafari, Abdosaleh“…The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was used to quality assessment of studies. …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto -
140por Kelly, Jaimon T, Law, Lynette, De Guzman, Keshia R, Hickman, Ingrid J, Mayr, Hannah L, Campbell, Katrina L, Snoswell, Centaine L, Erku, Daniel“…Quality of study reporting varied with between 63% to 92%, with an average of 77% of CHEERS items reported. CONCLUSION: Telehealth-delivered nutrition interventions in chronic disease populations appear to be cost-effective from a health perspective, and particularly mHealth modalities. …”
Publicado 2023
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Online Artículo Texto