Materias dentro de su búsqueda.
Mostrando 141 - 160 Resultados de 483 Para Buscar '"Cheers"', tiempo de consulta: 0.25s Limitar resultados
  1. 141
    “…The average percent of CHEERS checklist items reported was 79.6% (range 47.62–100, STD 14.18) and the top quartile reported 91.3–100%. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions
  2. 142
    “…Cost-effectiveness analyses of treating DD were identified and their quality was assessed using the CHEERS assessment tool for quality of reporting and Phillips checklist for model evaluation. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    What do we know about managing Dupuytren’s disease cost-effectively?
  3. 143
    “…Assessed articles will be screened for compliance with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) criteria. The association, with CHEERS criteria, of the journal impact factor, publication year, funding source, tumor site, trial or model-based study, and CPIs studied, will then be assessed. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Immunotherapy with check-point inhibitors (CPI) in adult malignancies: a protocol for the systematic review of the quality of economic analyses
  4. 144
    “…The most commonly studied cancers were acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n=10), Burkitt lymphoma (n=4) and Wilms tumour (n=3). The median CHEERS checklist score was 18 of 24. Many studies omitted key cost inputs. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Cost and cost-effectiveness of childhood cancer treatment in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review
  5. 145
    “…RESULTS: Twenty-six studies of economic evaluations met our inclusion criteria. The CHEERS scores for most studies (n = 9) were 85 or higher (excellent quality). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Economic evaluation of programs against COVID-19: A systematic review
  6. 146
    “…Simple changes to actual CHEERS reporting criteria may solve identified replication hurdles. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Replication of Published Health Economic Obesity Models: Assessment of Facilitators, Hurdles and Reproduction Success
  7. 147
    “…An electronic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed. A CHEERS checklist was used to assess the quality of reporting. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Methodological Approaches to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Saudi Arabia: What Can We Learn? A Systematic Review
  8. 148
    “…Five (8%), 39 (64%), 16 (26%), and one (2%) studies were classified as excellent, high, average, and poor quality, respectively. The mean of CHEERS checklist items reported was 80.8% (SD 14%). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions
  9. 149
    “…The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidance recommendations will design the review, and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement will be used to extract relevant data from studies retrieved. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    A comparison of international modelling methods to evaluate health economics of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review protocol
  10. 150
    por Wang, Tao, Li, Yilin, Zheng, Xiaoqiang
    Publicado 2023
    “…All studies met CHEERS recommendations, and all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in these studies were rated as having low risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Cost-effectiveness of the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review
  11. 151
    “…Out of the 24 characteristics assessed in the CHEERS checklist, more than 80% of the selected studies reported 14 of the characteristics. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Cost-utility analysis in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing kidney transplant; what pays? A systematic review
  12. 152
    “…The reporting quality of included studies was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. RESULTS: Ten studies were identified in the review. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    The Cost-Effectiveness of Kidney Replacement Therapy Modalities: A Systematic Review of Full Economic Evaluations
  13. 153
    “…The reporting quality of the publications was determined using the CHEERS checklist. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 396 publications, of which 44 met the inclusion criteria. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Health Economic Evidence of Point-of-Care Testing: A Systematic Review
  14. 154
    “…Overall reporting of the identified studies largely met CHEERS 2022 recommendations. The CORE and Cardiff models were the most frequently utilized for pharmacoeconomic evaluation in T2D. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Cost-Effectiveness of Newer Antidiabetic Drugs as Second-Line Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review
  15. 155
    “…The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist is used in the evaluation of quality. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Population or family history based BRCA gene tests of breast cancer? A systematic review of economic evaluations
  16. 156
    “…In which, four studies examined the cost-effectiveness of telemonitoring programs. Based on the CHEERS checklist for reporting quality of economic evaluations, the majority of economic evaluations were rated between 86 and 96%. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ambulatory heart failure nurse-led services: an integrated review
  17. 157
    “…The quality of the articles was evaluated using a CHEERS checklist. Results: 29 studies were included based on inclusion criteria. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Economic Evaluation of Palliative Care for Patients with Cancer Disease: A Systematic Review
  18. 158
    Tabla de Contenidos: “…Frondi tenere/Ombra mai fu -- Love sounds the alarm -- Tune your harps to cheerful strains -- Gentle airs, melodious strains -- So shall the lute and harp awake -- Total eclipse -- Comfort ye/Ev'ry valley -- Praise the Lord with cheerful noise -- There the brisk sparkling nectar -- While Kedron's brook -- Lascia ch'io piange -- Where'er you walk -- Sharp violins proclaim -- Ah! …”
    CD Audiom
    Favourite arias
  19. 159
    “…For the quality assessment, six studies fulfilled 85% of the CHEERS checklist requirements and are deemed good quality. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Systematic review of economic evaluations of aromatase inhibitors in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: quality evaluation
  20. 160
    “…Most studies complied with the CHEERS checklist, except for single study-based economic evaluations which did not report uncertainty analysis (78%). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
    Pharmacogenetic testing for adverse drug reaction prevention: systematic review of economic evaluations and the appraisal of quality matters for clinical practice and implementation
Herramientas de búsqueda: RSS