“…The consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) checklist was used to assess the reporting quality of the included studies. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The reporting quality of the included economic analyses was assessed as high, with an average score of 21 points per 24 maximum possible (range 14–23 points according to the ISPOR CHEERS statement checklist). In the case of most analyses, quality-adjusted life-years were used as a clinical outcome, and endpoints such as remission, response and mucosal healing were less common. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The reporting quality of the included studies was appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Each included study’s usefulness for decision-makers was assessed using an adapted version of a previously published approach. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Based on the review, an integrated model considering real patient flow was developed using CHEERS guidelines. The micro-costing top-down method was adopted to develop the cost model allowing a balance between the accuracy of the information and the feasibility of the cost estimate. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Material and Methods: the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting standards (CHEERS) checklist was used to extract the information from the texts. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Database analysis and synthesis included publication/study characteristics and costing reporting details in line with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS 2022) with the year of the database launch as the cut-off point to assess how the methods have developed over time. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The quality of the studies was evaluated with the CHEERS checklist. After data extraction, the results were synthesized by thematic content analysis. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…We extracted health outcomes and cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) and evaluated study quality using the CHEERS checklist. FINDINGS: 60 studies met the full inclusion criteria. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The methodological quality was evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) guide. The analysis were based on frequencies, costs and average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in 2018 US dollars adjusted for purchasing power parity. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) criteria for economic evaluations were used to evaluate the studies. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The quality of the articles was evaluated using the CHEERS checklist. RESULTS: Among 214 initial studies, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…We assessed their quality of reporting using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 checklist and summarized and narratively presented the results. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The primary studies included for analysis were assessed using the CHEERS statement and narratively synthesized. Results A total of five cost-effectiveness studies were included, predominantly based on randomized controlled trials. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) was used to assess the validity of the methods and transparency in reporting the results. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The economic analysis was conducted in accordance with CHEERS guidance as per current model objectives. Results are reported as costs per patient per year (PPPY). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…We critically appraised the literature found in searches, both against the CHEERS statement for quality reporting of economic evaluations and in terms of its usefulness for policy and decision-makers. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The model structure was also informed by the systematic review and an accompanying grading of economic models using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standard (CHEERS) checklist. A Markov model was developed, employing a lifetime horizon and costs and benefits were analysed from a payer's perspective and combined into incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs). …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was applied to evaluate the quality of the studies. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso

“…The reporting quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. Results: After the screening process on both the title and abstract and full text of 518 records, a total of 25 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and were included in the review. …”
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso
Enlace del recurso