Mostrando 21,541 - 21,560 Resultados de 23,109 Para Buscar '"Cohen"', tiempo de consulta: 0.26s Limitar resultados
  1. 21541
    “…We sought to compare the effect-sizes in the various articles but had to calculate them ourselves, at different follow-up time measurements. Effect-sizes (Cohen’s d or Hedge’s g coefficient) were considered low, medium, and large, at the cut points of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  2. 21542
    “…Diagnostic discrepancy was associated with a longer hospital stay (mean 10.29 vs. 6.90 days; Cohen’s d 0.47; 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.70; P = 0.002) and increased patient mortality (8 (8.60%) vs. 25(3.78%); OR 2.40; 95% CI 1.05 to 5.5 P = 0.038). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  3. 21543
    “…The increase in the rate of intervention success (before–after app) was 28.8% with a binomial effect size display (Cohen’s d effect size) of 0.751. Before the introduction of the app, data for albuminuria were included in 62.5% of nephrology referrals; in 2017, the corresponding value was 87.5% (P = 0.001). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  4. 21544
    “…The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, exact Mann-Whitney test and Fisher's exact test for group comparison, and Cohen's kappa for assessing agreement. The study was approved by the National Medical Ethics Committee. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  5. 21545
    “…The inter-observer agreement was calculated using cross-tabulation expressed in Cohen's Kappa. Kappa values were evaluated, according to Landis and Koch, as follows: 0-0.20 poor, 0.21-0.40 fair, 0.41-0.60 moderate, 0.61-0.80 substantial, and 0.81-1.0 almost perfect agreement. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  6. 21546
    “…Standard effect sizes (Cohen d) were provided for all outcomes. RESULTS: The HA group reported worse subjective hip function than the control group (HAGOS subscores: d = –0.7 to –2.1; P ≤ .004). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  7. 21547
  8. 21548
    “…RESULTS: In both groups, post-intervention OSCE scores increased significantly compared to baseline (Cohen’s d 0.87, p < 0.001 in SP group; d 0.77, p < 0.001 in RP group). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  9. 21549
    por Shim, J., Hamilton, D. F.
    Publicado 2019
    “…Internal responsiveness was assessed by standardized response mean (SRM) and effect size (Cohen’s d). External responsiveness was assessed by correlating change scores of the EQ-5D and PROMIS-10, with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the OKS. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  10. 21550
    “…We calculated the percent overall agreement, positive agreement, negative agreement and Cohen’s kappa coefficient. We performed multiple regression analyses to identify factors independently associated with discordance. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  11. 21551
    “…RESULTS: One hundred patients were examined by FCU that was performed by 1–4 independent examiners as well as by the reference method, contributing to 140 examinations (false positive rate, 19.0%; false negative rate, 52.6%; sensitivity, 47.4% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.3–68.3]; specificity, 81.0% [95% CI: 73.1–87.0]; Cohen’s κ measure for agreement = 0.22 [95% CI: 0.03–0.40]). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  12. 21552
    “…The intervention effects were tested using analysis of covariance and Cohen d tests. RESULTS: Functional capacity improved significantly in the e-CuidateChemo group compared to the control group (6-minute walk test: 62.07 [SD 130.09] m versus –26.34 [SD 82.21] m; 6-minute walk test % distance predicted: 10.81% [SD 22.69%] m versus –4.60% [SD 14.58%]; between-group effect: P=.015 for both). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  13. 21553
    “…RESULTS: After two blinded experimental sessions, the active group had significantly greater reductions in CAPS-IV total scores from baseline than the control group [MMRM estimated mean difference (SE) between groups − 22.0 (5.17), P < 0.001]. The between-group Cohen’s d effect size was 0.8, indicating a large treatment effect. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  14. 21554
    “…Unexpected was the 41% increase in parasite positive stage-1 CSF’s detected by LAMP. Cohen’s kappa coefficients for RIME versus TBG1 LAMP of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.82–1.00) for stage-1 and 0.90 (95%CI: 0.80–1.00) for stage-2 reflected a high level of agreement between the data sets indicating that the results were not due to amplicon contamination, data confirmed in χ(2) tests (p<0.001) and Fisher’s exact probability test (p = 4.7e(-13)). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  15. 21555
    “…The reliability between virtual and field audits (n = 40), as well as inter-rater reliability (n = 60) were assessed using percent agreement, Cohen’s Kappa statistic, and the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  16. 21556
  17. 21557
    “…Inter-rater agreement of LGE reports was by Cohen’s kappa. Image quality (low score = better) was better for MOCO-LGE (median, interquartile range [Q1–Q3]: 0 [0–0] vs. 2 [0–3], P < 0.0001). …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  18. 21558
    “…RESULTS: The level of agreement between the PCR-based techniques and HC2 system was determined with the Cohen’s kappa value. The kappa values between HC2 and GP-EIA, BSGP-EIA and pU 1 M-L/2R were 0.71 (CI 95% 0.63–0.78), 0.78 (CI 95% 0.71–0.84) and 0.63 (CI 95% 0.55–0.72), respectively. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  19. 21559
    “…For parametric data, effect sizes were calculated as Cohen’s d. For non-parametric data, ds were estimated by p-values and sample sizes according to statistical formulas. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
  20. 21560
    por Hughes, Julianne, Barone, Stephen
    Publicado 2019
    “…METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of data collected from children (ages 2 months- 18 years) treated at Cohen Children’s Medical Center, who had a positive BC deemed a contaminant. …”
    Enlace del recurso
    Enlace del recurso
    Online Artículo Texto
Herramientas de búsqueda: RSS